Probably more highly influenced by brand/model/age of drive(s) than anything else. Let's say you have a brand-new hdd with a statistical 4% failure rate
(I think this is fairly common among consumer-grade hdds -- the rate goes up with age). If you have another 'identical' drive coupled with the first in RAID 0, you now have a statistical failure rate of 8%. Complicated by the fact that it is much easier to recover some or all data from a failing single drive, than from a failed RAID 0.
If you want some of the performance boost of RAID 0 with the redundancy of RAID 1, use RAID 1+0 (aka RAID 10), at the expense of ½ the total hdd capacity.
IANA mathematician, this is just some half-remembered shit I read somewhere a year ago.
EDITED: 22 Dec 2015 13:52 by DSMITHHFX