> I didn't say everyone should switch.
So what exactly is "People still use Apache?" saying, because it looks an awful lot like an expression of surprise at there being a plural of person not having switched away from Apache yet.
> ...[waffle]...
Missing the point.
> switching out takes time and effort, but that doesn't mean you shouldn't do it.
That's precisely what it means: When one has a long list of tasks to achieve, the solution is basically to prioritise those tasks in terms of how much benefit they provide versus how much it costs to achieve them.
Those that wont benefit from switching or for whom it occupies too much time should not do it, unless either/both of those cases change.
Whilst there are sacrifices nginx makes in favour of performance, there will remain people who require functionality it does not provide, and Apache is likely to remain their best/only option for quite a while. Assuming they aren't in the ~15-20% that (OMG) don't use nginx or Apache.
If you're still reading anything here as superiority then I'm probably wasting my time, but at least it's making Truffles happy.