Reply to All
Show messages
Messages
Inbox
Search
Login
1–10
11–20
…
31–34
Another liar exposed!
From: koswix
15 Nov 2014 12:48
To: CHYRON (DSMITHHFX)
8 of 34
41270.8
In reply to
41270.7
Have you tried upping the AGP voltage to 2gb tbh?
From: CHYRON (DSMITHHFX)
15 Nov 2014 14:38
To: koswix
9 of 34
41270.9
In reply to
41270.8
Glad you mentioned that. Another reason to not upgrade: ram is maxed out @ 2G. I'll probably be buying a new barebones kit in another year or two, and get Win7 oem/jim*.
*Jim Intentionally Misleads
From: ANT_THOMAS
15 Nov 2014 16:23
To: CHYRON (DSMITHHFX)
10 of 34
41270.10
In reply to
41270.9
What's the cpu?
Win 7 runs fine on 2GB and a relatively slow (by today's standards) Core Duo (not Core 2 Duo) mobile cpu.
From: CHYRON (DSMITHHFX)
15 Nov 2014 17:44
To: ANT_THOMAS
11 of 34
41270.11
In reply to
41270.10
x2 4850e (2.5G)
From: ANT_THOMAS
15 Nov 2014 17:56
To: CHYRON (DSMITHHFX)
12 of 34
41270.12
In reply to
41270.11
Give Windows 7 a go.
From: CHYRON (DSMITHHFX)
15 Nov 2014 18:00
To: ANT_THOMAS
13 of 34
41270.13
In reply to
41270.12
I use it at work. Can't say it's noticeably better than xp.
From: Drew (X3N0PH0N)
15 Nov 2014 18:27
To: CHYRON (DSMITHHFX)
14 of 34
41270.14
In reply to
41270.13
It manages memory better than XP and so usually feels faster (i.e. is more responsive) on limited RAM.
From: 99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD)
15 Nov 2014 18:51
To: CHYRON (DSMITHHFX)
15 of 34
41270.15
In reply to
41270.14
Windows 8 FTW
From: CHYRON (DSMITHHFX)
15 Nov 2014 22:33
To: 99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD)
16 of 34
41270.16
In reply to
41270.15
If I used Windows more often, the version might matter to me.
EDITED: 15 Nov 2014 22:36 by DSMITHHFX
From: 99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD)
15 Nov 2014 22:52
To: CHYRON (DSMITHHFX)
17 of 34
41270.17
In reply to
41270.16
That version would blow your fucking mind. Or what passes for it.