Reply to All
Show messages
Messages
Inbox
Search
Login
1–10
11–20
21–30
31–40
41–50
…
71–75
Another legal question
From: Serg (NUKKLEAR)
4 Sep 2014 18:08
To: milko
39 of 75
41178.39
In reply to
41178.37
Killjoy... I'm well aware of all that, but at least I'm not being a fun-sponge!
From: milko
4 Sep 2014 18:10
To: Serg (NUKKLEAR)
40 of 75
41178.40
In reply to
41178.39
it's your own fault, you mentioned that fucking advert. I barely see a TV ad nowadays and I'm still aware of that one - it's shit
transcends
, man.
From: 99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD)
5 Sep 2014 07:47
To: milko
41 of 75
41178.41
In reply to
41178.40
I have
never
seen that ad.
And now I want to.
:((
From: ANT_THOMAS
5 Sep 2014 09:42
To: 99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD)
42 of 75
41178.42
In reply to
41178.41
That's one of them.
EDITED: 5 Sep 2014 09:42 by ANT_THOMAS
From: 99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD)
5 Sep 2014 10:09
To: ANT_THOMAS
43 of 75
41178.43
In reply to
41178.42
You mean there's more? One wasn't enough?
Thanks for the education. I can now see what Mike's on about.
From: fixrman
5 Sep 2014 13:10
To: koswix
44 of 75
41178.44
In reply to
41178.32
OK, so I'm left wondering why?
From: koswix
5 Sep 2014 13:42
To: fixrman
45 of 75
41178.45
In reply to
41178.44
Because what is just and what is legal are very different things?
From: fixrman
5 Sep 2014 17:07
To: koswix
46 of 75
41178.46
In reply to
41178.45
Right, but who said you had to give the 20%, your lawyer or hers? Reason I ask is because I was told something in a case I was involved in but the truth was on the other side, much more to my benefit. I pushed for answers, researched more and found that while I could have agreed in the issue, I also could negotiate for something better.
I am guessing you have that ability is well. Perhaps the reason for the 20% has something to do with what happened prior to the negative equity situation that remains applicable after, such as your ex put money toward the purchase of the house? What ever happened to the aces? I suppose you didn't want to have to use them.
For me, that would be a sticky situation were I to get divorced; we don't have "his money and her money", we have our money. I know some other couples who have totally separate finances, one pays utilities and one pays the mortgage, one pays the car loan the other pays the mobile bill. Too confusing to my way of thinking. Not saying this is your situation.
Maybe I am just old fashioned.
(car)
From: graphitone
5 Sep 2014 17:13
To: 99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD)
47 of 75
41178.47
In reply to
41178.43
I believe that lady is also doing a turn in Casualty. The tv show, that is.
Could be Holby City. I wasn't really paying attention.
:C
From: 99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD)
5 Sep 2014 18:26
To: fixrman
48 of 75
41178.48
In reply to
41178.46
The difference being that your lawyers are all just a bunch of money-grabbing crooks, while Sottish lawyers are fine, upstanding members of honest society.
Oh yes.