Reply to All
Show messages
Messages
Inbox
Search
Login
1–10
11–20
21–30
31–40
41–50
…
61–68
I need a 'nix hero!
From: Ken (SHIELDSIT)
12 Aug 2014 16:22
To: CHYRON (DSMITHHFX)
39 of 68
41162.39
In reply to
41162.37
Ha, these costs ~$350 I could have done this and more with a Raspberry Pi
This is a rollout of new equipment for our new inventory system. All these things need to do is launch a Citirix Receiver. They can do it with a wire, but I'm not running wire to 50 machines spread over God's creation!
From: Ken (SHIELDSIT)
12 Aug 2014 16:23
To: CHYRON (DSMITHHFX)
40 of 68
41162.40
In reply to
41162.38
I did indeed.
From: CHYRON (DSMITHHFX)
12 Aug 2014 16:29
To: Ken (SHIELDSIT)
41 of 68
41162.41
In reply to
41162.40
I ran it for a while on an old K6-II pc. It's an interesting little distro that (if nothing else) shows how bloated things have become.
Here's what someone had to do to get it running on a tc with only 512MB flash (I dunno about wifi though):
http://forum.slitaz.org/topic/installing-slitaz-on-thin-client-t5545
From: ANT_THOMAS
12 Aug 2014 17:41
To: Ken (SHIELDSIT)
42 of 68
41162.42
In reply to
41162.39
Probably would have run those cables by now!
From: CHYRON (DSMITHHFX)
12 Aug 2014 17:42
To: ANT_THOMAS
43 of 68
41162.43
In reply to
41162.42
:-((
From: ANT_THOMAS
12 Aug 2014 17:44
To: Ken (SHIELDSIT)
CHYRON (DSMITHHFX)
44 of 68
41162.44
In reply to
41162.43
True though!
Ken: will wifi be reliable on 50 units? With cheap small adapters?
EDITED: 12 Aug 2014 17:47 by ANT_THOMAS
From: Ken (SHIELDSIT)
12 Aug 2014 17:58
To: ANT_THOMAS
45 of 68
41162.45
In reply to
41162.44
I dunno. But I cracked one open and they appear to accept a wifi card like a laptop. I have a handful of those at home so I'm going to test tonight. I am getting them all in a row and powered on so I can image them once I get this sorted out.
And fuck that on running cable!
From: ANT_THOMAS
12 Aug 2014 18:05
To: Ken (SHIELDSIT)
46 of 68
41162.46
In reply to
41162.45
Possible to put an msata ssd in there? Bugger space for the distro.
Probably costing too much at that point though.
From: Drew (X3N0PH0N)
12 Aug 2014 18:15
To: Ken (SHIELDSIT)
47 of 68
41162.47
In reply to
41162.1
Basically you need the driver and the firmware. Then you can either compile a new kernel with the driver included (but you'd have to recompile your own kernel every time it's updated) or compile a kernel module for the driver (still probably need redoing for each new kernel but less hassle).
I'd go with a more up-to-date distro than Ubuntu for this. Ubuntu's kernels are very old. Something like Fedora might give you a better chance of the problem being solvable via a third party repo.
From: CHYRON (DSMITHHFX)
12 Aug 2014 18:21
To: Drew (X3N0PH0N)
48 of 68
41162.48
In reply to
41162.47
Ubuntus kernels are numbered 'old', but most cutting edge stuff is/will soon be backported. In my experience, you stand a far better chance of getting obscure -ish stuff in Ubuntu (often through debian repos) than you do in Fedora. And I prefer and use Fedora as my main distro.
Also I do not advise using latest Fedora release in production anyway (and neither do the Fedora folks!). Better use RHEL/clone or Ubuntu.