You may find
this site useful when you come to make further ridiculous claims in future.
For instance:
The burden of proof lies with someone who is making a claim, and is not upon anyone else to disprove. The inability, or disinclination, to disprove a claim does not render that claim valid, nor give it any credence whatsoever. However it is important to note that we can never be certain of anything, and so we must assign value to any claim based on the available evidence, and to dismiss something on the basis that it hasn't been proven beyond all doubt is also fallacious reasoning.
As it happens, I did look and the only thing I could find was stuff like this:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/32349079/ns/health-pet_health/t/dogs-are-smarter-toddlers-iq-tests-show/#.UEZU1NZlQ2Y
So, even we give them the benefit of the doubt and pretend that a dog is as clever as a 5 year old, are you really suggesting that anyone with the literal mental age of a 5 year old could be trained as a competent soldier and dog handler?
EDITED: 4 Sep 2012 20:24 by PILOTDAN