Fuck frameworks. It needs whoever is in charge of these things (either the foreign minister or a judge or whatever) to say "you're guaranteed safe passage. If you're subsequently charged and found guilty, you'll be imprisoned in Sweden, otherwise you'll be allowed safely back to wherever".
So you think it would be acceptable for Swedens elected to act outside of the law and / or make promises that they simply can't keep? Who is going to uphold this agreement, because it certainly wouldn't the judiciary or the EU. It's all fun and games to say "But they should do a, b and c, but I really don't think they're going to start passing new laws, which may or may not be in breach of international law.
I'm pretty sure the US denies that they are torturing Bradley Manning?
Manning is a US citizen so it's kind of a moot point, but I do agree that his treatment has been a disgrace. FWIW, I think the US justice system borders on being 3rd world. But that's not a discussion for now.
The US would presumably say they only want him for questioning, so it wouldn't be illegal - are Sweden responsible for what happens once the US have his hands on them, if they "believed" he was safe to go there?
That's hypothetical and I don't know, but I imagine it wouldn't come down to phrases like 'reason to believe' etc.
That's just the lamest cop-out ever.
No, no it's not. Why should the UK, Sweden and the EU make huge adjustments to years of precedented law for one man who is desperate to act outside of it?
Of course not. Again, they're not going to show their hand before it's guaranteed.
If the US and Sweden aren't going to play pass the parcel then they just need to say it.
If they have no intention of doing it, why would they not say it?
Because they simply can't promise it and secondly, why should they? At the end of the day, while Assange is 'safe' for the time being, he's stuck in a fucking embassy. There's really no advantage for Sweden to go to the effort - it's just a waiting time now. Governments don't like being held to ransom at the best of times.
I'm not sure this counts as being out of the system (as opposed to just using another system), but either way it's only happened now because all in-system ways of fighting the move have been blocked.
You're right, maybe out of reach would have been a better phrase.
EDITED: 19 Aug 2012 16:45 by PILOTDAN