Reply to All
Show messages
Messages
Inbox
Search
Login
1–10
11–20
…
31–35
text-shadow
From: af (CAER)
20 Sep 2011 13:01
To: ALL
1 of 35
38939.1
Is there a reason the forum strips
text-shadow
rules from inline CSS in posts and sigs?
From: Drew (X3N0PH0N)
20 Sep 2011 13:25
To: af (CAER)
2 of 35
38939.2
In reply to
38939.1
Yes. It's because they look
wack
:Y
From: Peter (BOUGHTONP)
20 Sep 2011 13:36
To: af (CAER)
3 of 35
38939.3
In reply to
38939.1
You should be thankful it doesn't also send someone round to your house with a baseball bat.
:@
From: Matt
20 Sep 2011 13:43
To: af (CAER)
4 of 35
38939.4
In reply to
38939.1
What they said.
Although really it's because BH only allows (some) CSS 2.x rules.
From: af (CAER)
20 Sep 2011 14:23
To: Drew (X3N0PH0N)
5 of 35
38939.5
In reply to
38939.2
Not
always
:(
EDITED: 20 Sep 2011 14:24 by CAER
From: Peter (BOUGHTONP)
20 Sep 2011 14:37
To: af (CAER)
6 of 35
38939.6
In reply to
38939.5
On big text (so titles, menus, etc) it's fine, and might even make things look good.
And if there's a noisy background image, it can (if done properly) help make things readable.
But for anything that's going to appear in a sig (i.e. small text, plain background), it can't look anything other than shit, and you should be ashamed with yourself for even considering it.
From: af (CAER)
20 Sep 2011 14:39
To: Peter (BOUGHTONP)
7 of 35
38939.7
In reply to
38939.6
Oh ye of little imagination
(fail)
From: ANT_THOMAS
20 Sep 2011 14:44
To: af (CAER)
8 of 35
38939.8
In reply to
38939.7
MOD MADNESS
:((
From: koswix
20 Sep 2011 16:16
To: af (CAER)
9 of 35
38939.9
In reply to
38939.7
Write your sig HTML in a normal HTML document, open it, take a screen shot and save it as a mother fucking GIF and use that for your sig. That'll show the Bougthon.
:C
From: af (CAER)
20 Sep 2011 16:21
To: koswix
10 of 35
38939.10
In reply to
38939.9
I might make a PHP thing on my site that returns a .bmp, that'd probably annoy him more.
I could do some interesting things if I could use JavaScript, too
:C