Reply to All
Show messages
Messages
Inbox
Search
Login
1–10
11–20
21–30
31–36
ja ja
From: Mouse
3 Jan 2007 16:09
To: Rowan
32 of 36
31598.32
In reply to
31598.31
Well why don't they use the same chemicals to knock you out wot they use for surgery and that?
EDITED: 3 Jan 2007 16:13 by MOUSE
From: Rowan
3 Jan 2007 16:56
To: Mouse
33 of 36
31598.33
In reply to
31598.32
I'm not reet sure. Perhaps it's something to do with how they'd react with the kill-you chemicals, or perhaps it's expense. Opponents to the injection suggest an alternative, I think, but proponents are following an "if it ain't broke don't fix it" path.
From: Mouse
3 Jan 2007 17:10
To: Rowan
34 of 36
31598.34
In reply to
31598.33
Aye, don't want em having a bad reaction and coming out in a rash or summink
(nod)
From: JonCooper
3 Jan 2007 18:12
To: Radio
35 of 36
31598.35
In reply to
31598.30
I dunno, I was thinking they were awake, more so since Rowans posts above
From: Manthorp
4 Jan 2007 19:49
To: ALL
36 of 36
31598.36
In reply to
31598.26
I'm wazzed and in parts exotic, but if either of u've got the inclination, there's a French revolutionary philosopher who did some pretty extreme experiments in which he grabbed guillotine victims from the Tumbrel and then roared questions in their ear. There seems to be some kind of confirmation of continuing conscioussness. Which is nice. sorta.