Music, Film, TV & BooksThe Eternal daughter and Poor Things

 

Press Ctrl+Enter to quickly submit your post
Quick Reply  
 
 
  
 From:  Kenny J (WINGNUTKJ)  
 To:  william (WILLIAMA)      
43018.4 In reply to 43018.3 
Quote: 
[The novelist Jonathan] Coe praised “Poor Things” as Gray’s “funniest" and “least uneven” novel.

Ooof.

Alasdair Gray is a bit local hero in my neck of the woods - most of the people I know who've studied English at Scottish Universities have some kind of entertaining/heartwarming story about him. I get an, well, I'd say "unquenchable" if getting about three quarters of the way through didn't quench it, so, um, I get a quenchable urge to read Lanark every couple of years.

I've read Poor Things once (my dad's copy - my mother adjudged it "too weird" for her when he passed it over), but not seen the film yet. My mate who's a proper Gray aficionado (and former student of his) was horrified by it, which is either a good thing or a bad thing.


Kenny
0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  william (WILLIAMA)   
 To:  Kenny J (WINGNUTKJ)     
43018.5 In reply to 43018.4 
So, essentially, you've succeeded in making my shame in never having read anything by him even more profound.

On the other hand, he is simply another name in the long list of great and influential figures who have written stuff that I should have read but have failed to do. 

He May Be Your Dog But He's Wearing My Collar

0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  william (WILLIAMA)   
 To:  Kenny J (WINGNUTKJ)     
43018.6 In reply to 43018.4 
Quote: 
I've read Poor Things once

What did you think of it? Your mate who was horrified by it: did he say why, or do you know why? I haven't really ever been horrified by a book. I started to read Atlas Shrugged but gave up because it's stunningly boring and badly written, full of contrived situations and wooden characters. I suppose I'm horrified that so many people consider it a great work of literature. I didn't enjoy American Psycho much, largely because the author's relish for the pornographic ultra-violence (mainly directed at women) was a bit too apparent. 
 

He May Be Your Dog But He's Wearing My Collar

0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  Kenny J (WINGNUTKJ)  
 To:  william (WILLIAMA)      
43018.7 In reply to 43018.6 
My wording was unclear - my mate was horrified that the film stripped the book of the Gray-ian Glaswegian elements and plunked it iin a twee, whimsical steampunk-eqsue world.

TBH, I can't remember much about the book, it as a while ago. In terms of being horrified by books by Scottish Authors, I'll point you in the direction of Iain Bank's Wasp Factory and Complicity as ones which I've struggled with because of the violence.

Kenny
0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  william (WILLIAMA)   
 To:  Kenny J (WINGNUTKJ)     
43018.8 In reply to 43018.7 
Ah, I see. I can understand why that might be horrifying. On the other hand, a book is one thing and a film another. And sometimes (not saying this time) the film is better than the book. Any film based on the writing of Dan Brown springs to mind. I try not to think of a film as being the book in another form, but it is difficult, and annoying sometimes.

He May Be Your Dog But He's Wearing My Collar

0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

Reply to All    
 

1–8

Rate my interest:

Adjust text size : Smaller 10 Larger

Beehive Forum 1.5.2 |  FAQ |  Docs |  Support |  Donate! ©2002 - 2024 Project Beehive Forum

Forum Stats