TechnicalDTS

 

Press Ctrl+Enter to quickly submit your post
Quick Reply  
 
 
  
 From:  william (WILLIAMA)  
 To:  Manthorp      
41892.8 In reply to 41892.1 
Well, if DTS sounds better to you than PCM, then that's probably, um, how it sounds to you. There are far too many variables here to come to a conclusion. For instance, have you played back a decent range of examples of each type on a decent range of kit? If not then it might be something as simple as your music equipment is suited to DTS streams. Or the DTS music you choose to listen to. 

The first thing that occurred to me when you mentioned hearing musical detail in DTS that was 'missing' in PCM, is the inherent differences between the two. DTS was specifically developed as a multi channel encoding method. DTS music/tracks are intentionally mixed and balanced as separate streams for the separate channels and different considerations are involved from mixing and balancing PCM for, say, a CD. It wouldn't surprise me, for instance, if the gain was wound up on a particular channel for a DTS track, and that might well emphasise, say, a vocal passage or a piece of guitar work that is less evident on a basic PCM recording.

Listen to a multi channel movie soundtrack on a stereo or mono sound system and hear how emphasised some of the lows and highs are, and often how muddy and unclear the voices can be.
never trust a man in a blue trench coat, never drive a car when you're dead
+1/1
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  koswix  
 To:  Manthorp      
41892.9 In reply to 41892.1 
All digital representation of an analogue source are compressed, i've no idea if there's a difference in the encoding between the two formats.

However, if you have a 5.1 source and are listening to it on 2.0, something somewhere is mixing the sources. The mix produced by VLC (or whatever) to 2.0 is going to be different to what a produced in a studio decided on, so it will sound different to the same album produced for 2.0 playback.

A CD is generally produced to sound 'good' on a variety of playback devices - a posh stereo, a car CD player, a noisy shop etc. When mixing for 5.1, a lot of those devices can be ignored so the decisions on the mix are a bit more straightforward in that respect.

 ▪                    
             ┌────┐    ┌────┐                      
          │    │    │    │ ▪                    
          │    └────┘    │                      
          │   ──┐  ┌──   │ ▪                    
   ┌──────┤    ▪    ▪    │                      
  ┌┘      │              │ ▪                    
┌─┤       └──┐  │  │  ┌──┘                      
│ │          │ ││  ││ │   ┌─┐                   
│ │          └─┼┤  └┴─┴───┘ │                   
│ │           ─┘│           │                   
│ │   ┌──────┐  └┬──────────┘                   
  │   │      │   │                              
  │   │      │   │                              
  └───┘      └───┘                              
If Feds call you and say something bad on me, it may prove what I said are truth, they are afraid of it.
+1/1
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  Manthorp   
 To:  ALL
41892.10 
Thanks WmA & Kos for thoughts.  No, Wm, I've not been that forensic about it.  

When I started to wonder if it was a thing, I listened to a couple of CDs and DTSs side by side (Foxtrot by Genesis, God help me, and Revolver by the Beatles)  I was very familiar with both, so maybe it was just that a different mix drew my attention to different bits.  But I still preferred it in both cases.  Could just be the novelty.

"We all have flaws, and mine is being wicked."
James Thurber, The Thirteen Clocks 1951

0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  CHYRON (DSMITHHFX)  
 To:  Manthorp      
41892.11 In reply to 41892.10 
Were said DTSs a jim contribution?
“Subway's 'Chicken' Only Contains 50 Percent Chicken”
0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  Manthorp   
 To:  CHYRON (DSMITHHFX)     
41892.12 In reply to 41892.11 
I believe he had a hand in it, yes.

"We all have flaws, and mine is being wicked."
James Thurber, The Thirteen Clocks 1951
 
0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  CHYRON (DSMITHHFX)  
 To:  Manthorp      
41892.13 In reply to 41892.12 
Ah, I was wondering if you could encode it yourself but I guess not (also you would need better sources than cd).
“Subway's 'Chicken' Only Contains 50 Percent Chicken”
+1/1
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  graphitone  
 To:  Manthorp      
41892.14 In reply to 41892.7 
Yep, got a few albums both on CD and DTS, mostly the reissued REM albums from their Warner Bros years.

I was poorly last night and went to bed early, so didn't get a chance to try it. Providing tonight (and my stomach) doesn't throw anything up, I'll try comparing them.
+1/1
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  graphitone  
 To:  Manthorp      
41892.15 In reply to 41892.7 
Right, I've had a listen to 'Losing My Religion' a few times through various audio wossnames. I've not put the subwoofer on 'cos the kids are in bed, so that's something to try on the weekend. :)

From the CD, standard stereo, things sound ok.

Listened to the 5.1 DTS and (as you  might expect) everything's punchier, vocals stand out, individual instruments can be heard through surround channels.

DTS in stereo /does/ make a difference. The bass guitar is way more discernable, while still maintaining the quailty of vocals as before.

There's also a Dolby Digital stereo track, but I couldn't tell any difference between that and the original.

I'd like to try it with the sub on too, and with some more complex tracks. I've got Nick Cave's Dig, Lazarus, Dig in 5.1, which sounds awesome and I'll try that out when I've got some free time.

 
0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  Manthorp   
 To:  graphitone     
41892.16 In reply to 41892.15 
You vindicate me.  Let's get married.  Charlotte will understand.

"We all have flaws, and mine is being wicked."
James Thurber, The Thirteen Clocks 1951
 
0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  graphitone  
 To:  Manthorp      
41892.17 In reply to 41892.16 
Why not come and live with us. I can offer you a chair and a purple blanket and all the cereal you can eat. You like muesli, right?

Also, who's Charlotte?! I'm pretty sure my wife's called Clare, admittedly I never asked for proof of ID when we started found out...
0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  Manthorp   
 To:  graphitone     
41892.18 In reply to 41892.17 
Charlotte is my own infinitely better half.

What is this muesli of which you speak?  I am conducting an extended experiment to demonstrate that alcohol alone is a sufficiently nutritious food to sustain a healthy life.

The purple blanket sounds nice though.

"We all have flaws, and mine is being wicked."
James Thurber, The Thirteen Clocks 1951
 
0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  graphitone  
 To:  Manthorp      
41892.19 In reply to 41892.18 
I figured that might be the case, but only after I posted that.

I wonder if anyone's tried soaking museli in gin, in the same way you can flavour it with raspberries/sloes etc. This could spawn a whole new product line, alco-puffs, shredded gin, merlot pops and baby sham bran.
+1/1
 Reply   Quote More 

Reply to All    
 

1–19

Rate my interest:

Adjust text size : Smaller 10 Larger

Beehive Forum 1.5.2 |  FAQ |  Docs |  Support |  Donate! ©2002 - 2025 Project Beehive Forum

Forum Stats