HardwareNAS me done

  

Press Ctrl+Enter to quickly submit your post
Quick Reply  
 
 
  
 From:  Manthorp   1 Mar 2017 17:16 
 To:  graphitone       10 of 17 
41889.10 In reply to 41889.8 
Good luck with that.  Why do they put bloaty shite on in the first place?
"We all have flaws, and mine is being wicked."
James Thurber, The Thirteen Clocks 1951
 
0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  graphitone    1 Mar 2017 19:48 
 To:  Manthorp     CHYRON (DSMITHHFX)      11 of 17 
41889.11 In reply to 41889.10 
Got it sorted, in addition to removing the photo/media server apps, there's an option to remove the index itself and that's stopped the process.

I guess they lease/procure apps from 3rd parties and take a fee for including them in the software. HP used to be buggers for it, there's still a lot of crap on the desktop PCs we get at work, but nowhere near the amount they used to have, it'd take something like half a day to get rid of it all.


images?q=tbn:8nj2HfmLhyV7yM:b
Drawings n' that

PIBEES
+1/1
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  CHYRON (DSMITHHFX)   1 Mar 2017 20:49 
 To:  graphitone       12 of 17 
41889.12 In reply to 41889.11 
AFAIK the consumer NAS purveyors take open source, without thanks or attribution, and 'customize' it (aka fuck it up) with all kinds of half-assed, performance and stability -killing add-ons they think folks want.
“Subway's 'Chicken' Only Contains 50 Percent Chicken”
+1/1
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  Serg (NUKKLEAR)   2 Mar 2017 13:02 
 To:  Manthorp     graphitone       13 of 17 
41889.13 In reply to 41889.1 
I very much doubt that bit of tape does anything except keep the cable in place. So yeh, no worries.

Steve - they have all this crap on them so that they're out-of-the-box-useful for non-techie types. Good enough reason really, but a PITA.
[...Insert Brain Here...]
0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  graphitone    3 Mar 2017 15:56 
 To:  Serg (NUKKLEAR)      14 of 17 
41889.14 In reply to 41889.13 
Ace biscuits.

Now begins the long slog of ripping all our existing films n' that.


images?q=tbn:8nj2HfmLhyV7yM:b
Drawings n' that

PIBEES
0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  ANT_THOMAS   3 Mar 2017 15:57 
 To:  graphitone       15 of 17 
41889.15 In reply to 41889.14 
Just download. Don't bother wasting your time ripping, Jim will help.
0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  graphitone    3 Mar 2017 16:26 
 To:  ANT_THOMAS      16 of 17 
41889.16 In reply to 41889.15 
I'm a bit anal about my media collection - ripped all my CDs a while back as FLAC and made sure all the album was correct. I recently started using Musicbee as a player and it pissed me off at first as it decided it was going to download what it thought I should have as album art rather than looking in the local folder for an image. I got this sorted after fiddling with the many many options it's got. :)

When it comes to films, I want a rip of the disc in high quality with the audio options configured to how I want them - you're always going to be chancing it with a download. I also get the option on whether or not to keep any extras, like audio commentary - something that's well worth it with the likes of Red Dwarf.  I appreciate it'll be quicker, but a DVD takes around 1.5 hours to rip, blu-rays maybe 2, but I can leave them going during the day/overnight while I'm doing other stuff. It's not an inconvenience, just time consuming.


images?q=tbn:8nj2HfmLhyV7yM:b
Drawings n' that

PIBEES
0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  ANT_THOMAS   3 Mar 2017 16:37 
 To:  graphitone       17 of 17 
41889.17 In reply to 41889.16 
If it's a full and complete rip then that definitely makes sense, rather than reencoding/compressing.

I don't like to download low quality rips, but I also don't want a full 30GB+ blu-ray rip taking up loads of space!
0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

Reply to All    
 

1–17

Rate my interest:

Adjust text size : Smaller 10 Larger

Beehive Forum 1.5.2 |  FAQ |  Docs |  Support |  Donate! ©2002 - 2024 Project Beehive Forum

Forum Stats