Odd connection issue

From:	Drew (X3N0PH0N)	14 Feb 2017 19:26
To:	ANT_THOMAS	17 of 24

41884.17 In reply to 41884.16
Yeah, I use SSHFS for letting things see the storage of other things and disabled the encryption as much as possible cos why not on an internal network. (Tried NFS but found it surprisingly flaky and way more complex to set up). , , , , , , , , , , `' (o,o) (o,o) (o,o) (o,o) (o,o) \ \|)__) \|)__) \|)__) \|)__) \|)__) ''`>-,--”-”---”-”---”-”---”-”---”-”---- ,'.*''`

0/0

Reply Quote

More

From:	ANT_THOMAS	14 Feb 2017 19:34
To:	Drew (X3N0PH0N)	18 of 24

41884.18 In reply to 41884.17
Yeah definitely fine on an internal network. Only played with NFS for one share after SMB was being odd. Always read about using NFS rather than SMB in all scenarios since it's supposed to be much quicker. A

0/0

Reply Quote

More

From:	Drew (X3N0PH0N)	14 Feb 2017 20:40
To:	ANT_THOMAS	19 of 24

41884.19 In reply to 41884.18
Should definitely be better than Samba, yeah. And I liked it apart from it just flaking out every couple of days. Probably my fault but I couldn't be arsed spending much time sorting it out since I don't need 99% of its features - I just want super-easy access to files across the network and sshfs is kinda perfect for that. , , , , , , , , , , `' (o,o) (o,o) (o,o) (o,o) (o,o) \ \|)__) \|)__) \|)__) \|)__) \|)__) ''`>-,--”-”---”-”---”-”---”-”---”-”---- ,'.*''`

0/0

Reply Quote

More

From:	ANT_THOMAS	14 Feb 2017 21:09
To:	Drew (X3N0PH0N)	20 of 24

41884.20 In reply to 41884.19
How are you mounting stuff? Via fstab? I remember years ago having various issues with network shares dropping out mounted using fstab and having to do "mount -a" far too often. Then I moved to autofs and it fixed all issues. If you're already using it then no idea, if you're not it might be worth playing with. Or stick with sshfs since it works! A

0/0

Reply Quote

More

From:	Drew (X3N0PH0N)	14 Feb 2017 22:27
To:	ANT_THOMAS	21 of 24

41884.21 In reply to 41884.20

Yeah, fstab but with systemd handling the mounts which works way better than ... however that worked before:

Code:

# SSHFS from varangian
drew@192.168.1.70:/mnt/big /mnt/big fuse.sshfs noauto,x-systemd.automount,_netdev,user,idmap=user,follow_symlinks,identityfile=/home/drew/.ssh/id_rsa,allow_other,uid=1000,gid=1000 0 0


             , ,   , ,   , ,   , ,   , ,   
  `'        (o,o) (o,o) (o,o) (o,o) (o,o)  
   *\*      |)__) |)__) |)__) |)__) |)__)  
     ''`>-,--”-”---”-”---”-”---”-”---”-”----
,'.*''`

0/0

Reply Quote

More

From:	CHYRON (DSMITHHFX)	15 Feb 2017 01:25
To:	Drew (X3N0PH0N)	22 of 24

41884.22 In reply to 41884.17
NFS is way quicker, and setup isn't too hard between unixy os (linux, mac/bsd). A bit less automagic than SAMBA. “Human Resources Startup Zenefits Is Laying Off Almost Half Its Employees”

0/0

Reply Quote

More

From:	Drew (X3N0PH0N)	15 Feb 2017 03:46
To:	CHYRON (DSMITHHFX)	23 of 24

41884.23 In reply to 41884.22
Setup was fine, it just needed to be restarted every few days which was a pain. Couldn't be arsed to dig into it since it was overkill for what I needed anyway. , , , , , , , , , , `' (o,o) (o,o) (o,o) (o,o) (o,o) \ \|)__) \|)__) \|)__) \|)__) \|)__) ''`>-,--”-”---”-”---”-”---”-”---”-”---- ,'.*''`

0/0

Reply Quote

More