Codinghtaccess mojo

 

Press Ctrl+Enter to quickly submit your post
Quick Reply  
 
 
  
 From:  Matt  
 To:  Peter (BOUGHTONP)     
41579.37 In reply to 41579.34 
Quote: 
non-constructive fanboy trolling it makes the comment an incredibly dumb one too.

J'accuse!

Because X having more than twice the number of users is a guarantee that something will be better? To dismiss the alternatives is also insanely arrogant, dumb and bordering on some insane brand loyalty fanboy-ism too.

 

doohicky

0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  Drew (X3N0PH0N)  
 To:  99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD)     
41579.38 In reply to 41579.36 
Sure but fewer people use those sort of web hosts these days. It's all Digital Oceans and Amazon S3s where you spin up your own VM and choose your own tools.
0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  CHYRON (DSMITHHFX)   
 To:  Drew (X3N0PH0N)     
41579.39 In reply to 41579.38 
Fewer which people, exactly?

----
"The general aim of these science fiction writers is to frighten the people into a state of paralysis or psychological incompetence bordering on hysteria" – FBI informant
0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  CHYRON (DSMITHHFX)   
 To:  ALL
41579.40 
And the .htaccess works (thus far) on client hosting.  :-O~~~

----
"The general aim of these science fiction writers is to frighten the people into a state of paralysis or psychological incompetence bordering on hysteria" – FBI informant
0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD)  
 To:  Drew (X3N0PH0N)     
41579.41 In reply to 41579.38 
The stats that you base that assertion on, are they publicly available or did you just make them up? ;)

truffy.gifbastard by name
bastard by nature

0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  Peter (BOUGHTONP)  
 To:  99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD)     
41579.42 In reply to 41579.41 
> The stats that you base that assertion on, are they
> publicly available or did you just make them up?

Plucked from his arse.

I don't doubt that more people are talking about those things, and they'll be more used in certain types of companies, but it's a lot lower than he thinks.

0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  Peter (BOUGHTONP)  
 To:  Drew (X3N0PH0N)     
41579.43 In reply to 41579.35 
Hey there Dr Smithmeister!

Adding the complexity of partial page loads to your website indicates that you're working on improving performance, suggesting to me that you'd be interested in a web server tuned more for performance than Apache.

Even if you've used it in the past, Nginx has improved a lot recently - it's got a whole bunch of in-depth documentation, plus some cool features that definitely make it better than Apache. Give it a spin and see what you think.

To get you started, here's an example of how your could implement those rewrite rules in Nginx...

0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  Peter (BOUGHTONP)  
 To:  Drew (X3N0PH0N)     
41579.44 In reply to 41579.35 
But that'd be like helpful and stuff, and why on earth would anyone want that?!?
0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  Peter (BOUGHTONP)  
 To:  Matt     
41579.45 In reply to 41579.37 
You seem to be operating under the mistaken assumptions than I am dismissing Nginx and that I prefer Apache.

I am not dismissing anything - they are both valid options (depending on the specific needs of their users), but neither of them is my web server of choice.

To be sure, I would accept a move to either in favour of the IIS I currently have to deal with, but given free reign... well, as it happens the one I'd go with appears to have both better performance and a smaller user base than Nginx.

0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  Peter (BOUGHTONP)  
 To:  CHYRON (DSMITHHFX)      
41579.46 In reply to 41579.40 
\o/
0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  ANT_THOMAS  
 To:  Peter (BOUGHTONP)     
41579.47 In reply to 41579.45 
And that is?
0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  Peter (BOUGHTONP)  
 To:  ANT_THOMAS     
41579.48 In reply to 41579.47 
I love pizza! :)


YNOPRQBXEVWUZISJCDFGHAKLMT

0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  ANT_THOMAS  
 To:  Peter (BOUGHTONP)     
41579.49 In reply to 41579.48 
?
0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  Drew (X3N0PH0N)  
 To:  Peter (BOUGHTONP)     
41579.50 In reply to 41579.45 
*rein.
0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

Reply to All    
 

1–20  21–40  41–50

Rate my interest:

Adjust text size : Smaller 10 Larger

Beehive Forum 1.5.2 |  FAQ |  Docs |  Support |  Donate! ©2002 - 2024 Project Beehive Forum

Forum Stats