Codinghtaccess mojo

 

Press Ctrl+Enter to quickly submit your post
Quick Reply  
 
 
  
 From:  Matt  
 To:  Peter (BOUGHTONP)     
41579.26 In reply to 41579.25 
Its called a generalisation, with an emoticon to show mock surprise.

You can't simply cut out bits of my post and claim it's waffle. You need to show which bit is waffle and why.

Also, why does something taking time and effort mean you shouldn't do it? When you have a laundry list of tasks that you need to prioritise, investigating change should be in there. Not necessarily at the top, but to negate it entirely is foolish.

doohicky

0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  CHYRON (DSMITHHFX)   
 To:  99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD)     
41579.27 In reply to 41579.24 
There's only one cure for nerd rage: disco.
http://youtu.be/u1qN6gLbUMw

----
"The general aim of these science fiction writers is to frighten the people into a state of paralysis or psychological incompetence bordering on hysteria" – FBI informant
0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  Peter (BOUGHTONP)  
 To:  Matt     
41579.28 In reply to 41579.26 
> You can't simply cut out bits of my post and claim it's waffle

I think you'll find I can - see msg:41579.25 for an example.


> Also, ...[waffle]... to negate it entirely is foolish.

It seems I mis-judged when reducing; my original wording made it impossible to claim inferrance of that nonsense. Oh well.

Keeping abreast of the available options is a relatively simple task that all competent professionals do, and an entirely separate step from deciding whether any alternative should be even considered, nevermind actually testing it out and scheduling when a live implementation is viable and sensible.

0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  Matt  
 To:  Peter (BOUGHTONP)     
41579.29 In reply to 41579.28 
> [some waffle Pete said that I'm not going to quote properly so people don't know what I'm referencing to try and make me look better, but really all I'm doing is showing I can't be bothered to argue his points properly].

Pizza, what do you have on it?

doohicky

0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  Matt  
 To:  CHYRON (DSMITHHFX)      
41579.30 In reply to 41579.27 
Its Sunday night fever, but close enough.

doohicky

0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  koswix  
 To:  Peter (BOUGHTONP)     
41579.31 In reply to 41579.22 
Wow, who pissed on your waffles this morning?

 ▪                    
             ┌────┐    ┌────┐                      
          │    │    │    │ ▪                    
          │    └────┘    │                      
          │   ──┐  ┌──   │ ▪                    
   ┌──────┤    ▪    ▪    │                      
  ┌┘      │              │ ▪                    
┌─┤       └──┐  │  │  ┌──┘                      
│ │          │ ││  ││ │   ┌─┐                   
│ │          └─┼┤  └┴─┴───┘ │                   
│ │           ─┘│           │                   
│ │   ┌──────┐  └┬──────────┘                   
  │   │      │   │                              
  │   │      │   │                              
  └───┘      └───┘                              
If Feds call you and say something bad on me, it may prove what I said are truth, they are afraid of it.

0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  Drew (X3N0PH0N)  
 To:  Peter (BOUGHTONP)     
41579.32 In reply to 41579.28 
I know far less about this stuff than you or Matt and my use of dedicated web servers these days is pretty much limited to reverse proxying node apps.

But Apache was always a struggle for me. Its config files felt arcane and I never really understood what I was doing with it.

Nginx feels like a breeze in comparison. I understand its config and its far easier to get it to do the (limited, admittedly) things I want it to do.

From my less technical perspective (though having used both a reasonable amount) my impression is that Nginx can do about 90% of what Apache can do and it does much of it better.
0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  patch  
 To:  ALL
41579.33 
Now that I'm living in a country that uses the "ng" sound in a lot of the place names, "nginx" is a really hard word to read.
0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  Peter (BOUGHTONP)  
 To:  Drew (X3N0PH0N)     
41579.34 In reply to 41579.32 
Yes, and ...? ¬_¬

The sole point I'm trying to get through the apparently lead-lined skulls in this place is that the remark "People still use X? Oh." is at best lame and non-constructive fanboy trolling. If you consider that X has more than twice the users of its nearest alternative, and will likely continue to have the largest user base of its class for the next five years, it makes the comment an incredibly dumb one too.

Whether or not X is or was any good is entirely irrelevant to that.

Why the fuck is it so hard to get people using their brains?

0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  Drew (X3N0PH0N)  
 To:  Peter (BOUGHTONP)     
41579.35 In reply to 41579.34 
Hyperbole and facetiousness.

(i.e. it was less a statement of what is the case and more a statement of what Matt believes should be the case. That most people in most cases would probably be better served by Nginx than Apache. And he's probably right).
0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD)  
 To:  Drew (X3N0PH0N)     
41579.36 In reply to 41579.35 
I think the point that Peter's making is that Apache comes bundled as part of a whole host of web hosting and devices, and most of them won't know better or even give a shit

So nginx is superior? So when did that ever matter?

truffy.gifbastard by name
bastard by nature

0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  Matt  
 To:  Peter (BOUGHTONP)     
41579.37 In reply to 41579.34 
Quote: 
non-constructive fanboy trolling it makes the comment an incredibly dumb one too.

J'accuse!

Because X having more than twice the number of users is a guarantee that something will be better? To dismiss the alternatives is also insanely arrogant, dumb and bordering on some insane brand loyalty fanboy-ism too.

 

doohicky

0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  Drew (X3N0PH0N)  
 To:  99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD)     
41579.38 In reply to 41579.36 
Sure but fewer people use those sort of web hosts these days. It's all Digital Oceans and Amazon S3s where you spin up your own VM and choose your own tools.
0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  CHYRON (DSMITHHFX)   
 To:  Drew (X3N0PH0N)     
41579.39 In reply to 41579.38 
Fewer which people, exactly?

----
"The general aim of these science fiction writers is to frighten the people into a state of paralysis or psychological incompetence bordering on hysteria" – FBI informant
0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  CHYRON (DSMITHHFX)   
 To:  ALL
41579.40 
And the .htaccess works (thus far) on client hosting.  :-O~~~

----
"The general aim of these science fiction writers is to frighten the people into a state of paralysis or psychological incompetence bordering on hysteria" – FBI informant
0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD)  
 To:  Drew (X3N0PH0N)     
41579.41 In reply to 41579.38 
The stats that you base that assertion on, are they publicly available or did you just make them up? ;)

truffy.gifbastard by name
bastard by nature

0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  Peter (BOUGHTONP)  
 To:  99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD)     
41579.42 In reply to 41579.41 
> The stats that you base that assertion on, are they
> publicly available or did you just make them up?

Plucked from his arse.

I don't doubt that more people are talking about those things, and they'll be more used in certain types of companies, but it's a lot lower than he thinks.

0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  Peter (BOUGHTONP)  
 To:  Drew (X3N0PH0N)     
41579.43 In reply to 41579.35 
Hey there Dr Smithmeister!

Adding the complexity of partial page loads to your website indicates that you're working on improving performance, suggesting to me that you'd be interested in a web server tuned more for performance than Apache.

Even if you've used it in the past, Nginx has improved a lot recently - it's got a whole bunch of in-depth documentation, plus some cool features that definitely make it better than Apache. Give it a spin and see what you think.

To get you started, here's an example of how your could implement those rewrite rules in Nginx...

0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  Peter (BOUGHTONP)  
 To:  Drew (X3N0PH0N)     
41579.44 In reply to 41579.35 
But that'd be like helpful and stuff, and why on earth would anyone want that?!?
0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  Peter (BOUGHTONP)  
 To:  Matt     
41579.45 In reply to 41579.37 
You seem to be operating under the mistaken assumptions than I am dismissing Nginx and that I prefer Apache.

I am not dismissing anything - they are both valid options (depending on the specific needs of their users), but neither of them is my web server of choice.

To be sure, I would accept a move to either in favour of the IIS I currently have to deal with, but given free reign... well, as it happens the one I'd go with appears to have both better performance and a smaller user base than Nginx.

0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

Reply to All  
 

1–20  21–40  41–50

Rate my interest:

Adjust text size : Smaller 10 Larger

Beehive Forum 1.5.2 |  FAQ |  Docs |  Support |  Donate! ©2002 - 2025 Project Beehive Forum

Forum Stats