To all,
Why the gigantic odd signatures that appear here?
Jest askin'
I've been trying to find out how to ban/limit images on a SERIOUS G+ page of mine .........
(I don't even like cute animals.)
Actually, I don't even like humourless people - actually most people........
I'm going to use Teh on my new world-enlightening project and I would like to find a way of limiting the size of graphics of any kind on it. (rar)
Don't even ask me.... I've been on the wagon for decades and only drink "pretend" coffee now :-<
But any upmarket Chinese Restaurateur can introduce you to the many special teas....
I suppose you might be talking about mine. Mine comes from the days of PC Mag/Extreme Tech. There was a forum member (Sethness) there who made signatures for folks, often free-hand artistic drawrings. What you see is an iteration of that because unfortunately Seth stopped making sigs - or perhaps he just didn't like me. :-P We were limited to the height and weight of the image; this style/size was considered the largest one could go and be within acceptable limits. It isn't graphics intensive and loads quickly even on a dialup connection.
You can not allow or disallow signatures of you want or just allow text signatures. Sounds a bit boring to me, but they aren't my monkees, not my circus. Signatures are fairly common within a forum as are avatars. Apparently you have no problem with pixelated emoticons, something I find a bit odd, but...
Did you ever see such a messed up situation in your whole life, son?
I thought you thought biscuits were those wheel like things you had with gravy?
We have a similar thing to you re. the dog treats. We call them dog biscuits. I know it's a complex idea, but doesn't half help to differentiate things by putting the name of the thing the thing belongs to before it.
Helmets are ubiquitous, but a policeman's helmet becomes specific.
Everyone has fingernails, but Dave's fingernails belong to him.
Flatulence abounds, but PB's farts are a personal thing.
bastard by name