TechnicalFaster WiFi possible ?

 

Press Ctrl+Enter to quickly submit your post
Quick Reply  
 
 
  
 From:  koswix  
 To:  cynicoid      
41313.3 In reply to 41313.1 
I did a speedtest at Uni over the wifi and only get 48Mbps each way. From a wired connection I hit per-user cap of 100Mbits each way.

I think Wifi is just a bit shit, tbh.

 ▪                    
             ┌────┐    ┌────┐                      
          │    │    │    │ ▪                    
          │    └────┘    │                      
          │   ──┐  ┌──   │ ▪                    
   ┌──────┤    ▪    ▪    │                      
  ┌┘      │              │ ▪                    
┌─┤       └──┐  │  │  ┌──┘                      
│ │          │ ││  ││ │   ┌─┐                   
│ │          └─┼┤  └┴─┴───┘ │                   
│ │           ─┘│           │                   
│ │   ┌──────┐  └┬──────────┘                   
  │   │      │   │                              
  │   │      │   │                              
  └───┘      └───┘                              
If Feds call you and say something bad on me, it may prove what I said are truth, they are afraid of it.
+1/1
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  cynicoid   
 To:  ANT_THOMAS     
41313.4 In reply to 41313.2 
The superrouter I've been supplied is apparantly the dogs danglies.

It runs dual band 2.4/5 Ghz at both 20/40 Mhz all at the same time and at 802.11a/n/ac/b/g/, however it also looks like it's one of the shittest for wireless !

I didn't know there was a speed difference between wired and wireless, thought it was just limited by the speed of the cards, a slight difference I could live with but 50Mbps !! I've upgraded from 20meg ADSL to 80meg fibre and only doubled my wireless speed.

Reading online it appears part of the problem is my existing cards/dongle operate on the n and g protocol at 2.4Ghz and are limited to 54Mbps (which is the speed I thought I'd get) so upgrading to a faster card with a newer protocol should improve things but they will never reach the max speed.

Funny how the ISP's don't say the only way to get close to maximum advertised superfast fibre download speeds is by using a wired connection, but all supply wireless routers.
0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  ANT_THOMAS  
 To:  cynicoid      
41313.5 In reply to 41313.4 
It is also a wired router....?

WiFi never gives advertised speeds.
0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  patch  
 To:  cynicoid      
41313.6 In reply to 41313.4 
Speaking as a network engineer, wifi is always shonky. Cables are always the best way, even if they're messy.
0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  cynicoid   
 To:  ALL
41313.7 
After a bit more research it looks like my adapters are old and don't support some of the newer tech.

Seems I can get a bit more speed by getting a dual band adapter that supports 802.11 n and ac, although from what I've read 'ac' can actually be slower than 'n' due to interference issues.

Quite surprised there's differences in speed between different 'n' class adapters, thought they all operated to the same specification so the speeds would be identical.
0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  CHYRON (DSMITHHFX)  
 To:  cynicoid      
41313.8 In reply to 41313.7 
Aren't network standards based on highest possible theoretical speeds?

----
"Ninety percent of Americans use the Internet. The other ten percent use the banjo."
0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

Reply to All    
 

1–8

Rate my interest:

Adjust text size : Smaller 10 Larger

Beehive Forum 1.5.2 |  FAQ |  Docs |  Support |  Donate! ©2002 - 2025 Project Beehive Forum

Forum Stats