War & PoliticsThe natives are getting restless

 

Press Ctrl+Enter to quickly submit your post
Quick Reply  
 
 
  
 From:  johngti_mk-ii  
 To:  Drew (X3N0PH0N)     
41190.52 In reply to 41190.51 
I think that what bothers me has been the whole tone of it all. Salmond and his lot come over as a bunch of twats who's whole argument seems to be based on "fuck you English bastards, we're off with the pound and all the oil and you can't stop us. And then we'll live in a socialist paradise" (which they won't because salmond et al are still politicians). The no lot are just as fucktarded and have only managed to come up with "well, if you go then DISASTER awaits".

Cameron should've agreed to allow a proper debate on devolving powers that the whole country could have benefitted from.

As an aside, I don't buy the argument re london and the south east. There are big parts of the area where there's a ridiculous amount of depravation and poverty. The investment is the city of London outwards to where the rich live so west London, Surrey, the m4 corridor. Kent is still just outside the bit that people move to on account of it being to the south east. So places like dartford are split, one half of the town is all council estates and unemployment. Bits of rural kent are admittedly lovely but then the same is true anywhere else in the uk. Generally, Britain today makes the rich richer wherever they live.

Add THE VETOES to your myspace friends!!! Pretty please :D

0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD)  
 To:  Drew (X3N0PH0N)     
41190.53 In reply to 41190.51 
quote: X3N0PH0N
Westminster cares about London then the South East then...

Really? So all those MPs from outside London and the SE flagrantly give up on representing their constituents as soon as they enter the hallowed portals of Westminster? Rotten scoundrels, the lot of them! :@

truffy.gifbastard by name
bastard by nature

0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  Drew (X3N0PH0N)  
 To:  99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD)     
41190.54 In reply to 41190.53 
No, they're just fighting an uphill battle.
0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD)  
 To:  Drew (X3N0PH0N)     
41190.55 In reply to 41190.54 
Yes, I can see that, what with being massively outnumbered by the MPs from the SE

truffy.gifbastard by name
bastard by nature

0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  ANT_THOMAS  
 To:  99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD)     
41190.56 In reply to 41190.55 
I'm going to try and find a list of where MPs are actually from and where they represent.

I'm sure you know MPs are often placed in seats they have never had any relation to.
0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  koswix   
 To:  99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD)     
41190.57 In reply to 41190.55 
Because we all know that MPs have loads of power and are allowed to vote based on their own views and interests and not just how the party whips tell them.

 ▪                    
             ┌────┐    ┌────┐                      
          │    │    │    │ ▪                    
          │    └────┘    │                      
          │   ──┐  ┌──   │ ▪                    
   ┌──────┤    ▪    ▪    │                      
  ┌┘      │              │ ▪                    
┌─┤       └──┐  │  │  ┌──┘                      
│ │          │ ││  ││ │   ┌─┐                   
│ │          └─┼┤  └┴─┴───┘ │                   
│ │           ─┘│           │                   
│ │   ┌──────┐  └┬──────────┘                   
  │   │      │   │                              
  │   │      │   │                              
  └───┘      └───┘                              
If Feds call you and say something bad on me, it may prove what I said are truth, they are afraid of it.

0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  Jo (JELLS)  
 To:  koswix      
41190.58 In reply to 41190.57 
At least you have MPs that do just that and do defeat government bills from time to time. The drones in Canada never do - they aren't even allowed to speak their own words. They're given scripts written by political staffers in the PM's office. People in the UK have no idea how much people in Canada (who bother to follow politics) envy Westminster compared to the shit that happens in Ottawa.
0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  CHYRON (DSMITHHFX)  
 To:  Jo (JELLS)     
41190.59 In reply to 41190.58 
 T_T


I BLAME THE QUEEN!

----
"Ninety percent of Americans use the Internet. The other ten percent use the banjo."
0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD)  
 To:  ANT_THOMAS     
41190.60 In reply to 41190.56 
Please could you present the data as a colour-coded map?

truffy.gifbastard by name
bastard by nature

0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  ANT_THOMAS  
 To:  99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD)     
41190.61 In reply to 41190.60 
I still need to read both of these fully but there's some colour-coded maps here:

http://www.democraticaudit.com/?p=1049
http://www.democraticaudit.com/?p=1230
0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD)  
 To:  ANT_THOMAS     
41190.62 In reply to 41190.61 
The first one seems to suggest that Scottish and NI constituencies are better represented by 'local' MPs than England. I would've thought they'd have a greater interest in representing their constituents.

Chart One: Proportion of MPs born within the region they represent

truffy.gifbastard by name
bastard by nature

0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

Message 41190.63 deleted 22 May 2015 13:04 by 53NORTH

 From:  koswix   
 To:  ALL
41190.64 
Think the poll closes tomorrow, so if anyone hasn't voted that wants to now is the time

 ▪                    
             ┌────┐    ┌────┐                      
          │    │    │    │ ▪                    
          │    └────┘    │                      
          │   ──┐  ┌──   │ ▪                    
   ┌──────┤    ▪    ▪    │                      
  ┌┘      │              │ ▪                    
┌─┤       └──┐  │  │  ┌──┘                      
│ │          │ ││  ││ │   ┌─┐                   
│ │          └─┼┤  └┴─┴───┘ │                   
│ │           ─┘│           │                   
│ │   ┌──────┐  └┬──────────┘                   
  │   │      │   │                              
  │   │      │   │                              
  └───┘      └───┘                              
If Feds call you and say something bad on me, it may prove what I said are truth, they are afraid of it.

0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  fixrman  
 To:  Drew (X3N0PH0N)     
41190.65 In reply to 41190.24 
So I had a chat with cousin who lives in Ireland today on Skype and we discussed what may be developing on this independence vote so I decided to peruse the thread to see what the general feeling might be and I came upon this:

Quote: 
Ok, so, as Scotland, as I say, you rely on powerful overseas allies and English weakness. Those allies are usually France and the Scandinavian countries, those are the ones that make sense. And English weakness means poaching territories off them while they're engaged in stupid wars with France and/or Spain or, even better, if the War of the Roses happens (conditions have to be right for it to occur) just marching in and taking a nice big chunk of England while they're fighting with themselves.
 

So are the English stupid for fighting those wars, or is it just the war that is stupid, as in nonsensical? What about France and Spain? Is stupid (nonsensical) only objectionable when paired with women, or can it be used in the same vein either way? Just curious. I recall watching Are You Being Served? years ago and Captain Peacock said to Mrs. Peacock, "I did it for you, you stupid cow!" Mrs. Peacock was not offended, nor was anyone else.

Anyway, cousin thought that the vote would be close but that the independence vote would not pass. We don't get much on that I am afraid, so I was looking here to see what the feeling might be, He gave me some interesting history on Scotland which I would have had no way of knowing. We wouldn't get that kind of history here except in specialised courses of study. I found it remarkable that as young as sixteen will be eligible to vote.

It is an interesting process I plan to follow more over the next day. I am wondering what will happen if Yes Scotland does not prevail; are the natives truly restless? Will it result in any backlash? Hopefully there will be no actions such as the irrational behaviour that followed the shooting in Ferguson, MO., but of course theirs is a political process.

Is there enough support for an independent Scotland? The ramifications are certainly many.

 
  Did you ever see such a messed up situation in your whole life, son?
0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  fixrman  
 To:  Drew (X3N0PH0N)     
41190.66 In reply to 41190.51 
Quote: 
Scotland is a distinct cultural an political entity which votes distinctly differently from England and Wales, as that distinct entity, never gets the government it votes for nor the attention or concern it deserves. Similar arguments can be made for the rest of the UK but I really don't get why the prospect of Scotland choosing for itself to try to make its own lot better bothers you so much.
You'd have been handy over here in say, 1765.
 
  Did you ever see such a messed up situation in your whole life, son?
0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  Drew (X3N0PH0N)  
 To:  fixrman     
41190.67 In reply to 41190.65 
You're crossing the streams now.

I never objected to you calling those women stupid, I objected to you singling them out.

Those wars are stupid in the context of the game (and historically, really) because they're futile, neither side can win nor really gain anything of any particular worth. They're stupid because while England is busy banging its head against the continent for a coupla hundred years I can sneak down and steal all their land.
 
Quote: 
Hopefully there will be no actions such as the irrational behaviour that followed the shooting in Ferguson, MO., but of course theirs is a political process.

Not sure what you mean by 'theirs is a political process'. It's all politics.

There may be some backlash, a spot of rioting here and there (whichever way the vote goes) but it'll be limited and die down pretty fast. No is more likely for sure, but the vote really could go either way depending on which side turns out.

​Likely if No wins, there'll be another referendum in another 10 years or so.
 
0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  Drew (X3N0PH0N)  
 To:  fixrman     
41190.68 In reply to 41190.66 
American independence fascinates me. One of the interesting things about it is that it was an entirely undemocratic process - the majority of the people in the Thirteen Colonies were anti-independence (narrowly) and the issue was largely pushed through (by force, of course) by an educated liberal elite.

You had some of the smartest people in the world at that time and you had a system which enabled them to put their heads together to imagine a better future. There's a lesson there.

 
0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  Serg (NUKKLEAR)  
 To:  Drew (X3N0PH0N)     
41190.69 In reply to 41190.24 
Honestly, that's more interesting than real life right now. Please continue.
[...Insert Brain Here...]
0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  Drew (X3N0PH0N)  
 To:  Serg (NUKKLEAR)     
41190.70 In reply to 41190.69 
Hah. I had two more tires and then read up on whether it's even possible. Apparently playing as Scotland become much harder after the last patch as it's slightly broken naval deployment (which means England are less inclined to commit properly tot he 100 years war). 

Also we're about to witness the birth of a new (sort of) nation (maybe)! That's interesting!
0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  Serg (NUKKLEAR)  
 To:  ALL
41190.71 
My major concern is a more immediate one; my second concern stems from (as far as I'm concerned) unverified sources.

First point: whichever way the vote goes (aside from an overwhelming "no"), there will most likely be immediate market response which is most likely going to cause UK equities to drop - especially those with Scottish interests of course, along with the pound. Establishing a new currency would quite possibly bring a whole new uncertain world of pain as well, but that's another subject. If the outcome is "yes", this market reaction may well be more pronounced, though a reaction is almost guaranteed regardless of the outcome - and it already began a while ago.. While the theoretical process of an "yes" outcome involves careful consideration/negotiation over some length of time to decide how the split all goes ahead, I believe that the markets may react in such a way that this simply wouldn't happen, and it would instead be a much more rushed process; I also don't see that many reasons why the BoE and the rUK would provide generous terms during any negotiations, even more so if external factors are pressuring these to finalise quicker.

Second point: from here, mostly. I don't really see what Salmond's actual, thought out plan post-"yes" is, and I am starting to believe that the quest for independence is more of a political selling point, a knee-jerk reaction rather than a negotiated decrease in Westminster influence (which is already happening) which would possibly grant Scotland most of what it wants with far fewer risks.
[...Insert Brain Here...]
+1/1
 Reply   Quote More 

Reply to All  
 

1–20  21–40  41–60  61–80  …  181–189


Rate my interest:

Adjust text size : Smaller 10 Larger

Beehive Forum 1.5.2 |  FAQ |  Docs |  Support |  Donate! ©2002 - 2024 Project Beehive Forum

Forum Stats