War & PoliticsIf the General Election were tomorrow...

 

Press Ctrl+Enter to quickly submit your post
Quick Reply  
 
 
  
 From:  koswix  
 To:  Dave!!     
40697.28 In reply to 40697.27 
Hey, he apologised!



 ▪                    
             ┌────┐    ┌────┐                      
          │    │    │    │ ▪                    
          │    └────┘    │                      
          │   ──┐  ┌──   │ ▪                    
   ┌──────┤    ▪    ▪    │                      
  ┌┘      │              │ ▪                    
┌─┤       └──┐  │  │  ┌──┘                      
│ │          │ ││  ││ │   ┌─┐                   
│ │          └─┼┤  └┴─┴───┘ │                   
│ │           ─┘│           │                   
│ │   ┌──────┐  └┬──────────┘                   
  │   │      │   │                              
  │   │      │   │                              
  └───┘      └───┘                              
If Feds call you and say something bad on me, it may prove what I said are truth, they are afraid of it.

0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  Jo (JELLS)  
 To:  koswix     
40697.29 In reply to 40697.25 
I mostly compare him to our Tory PM and compared our PM, Cameron has... a personality, is well-spoken and is 99% less loony than most in his party. Plus he respects parliament while our idiot has been found in contempt of parliament twice, has misused prorogation to avoid confidence votes and other scandals and just generally abuses the parliamentary process every single way he can (not to mention his party regularly violates our election laws). Cameron is just classy next to our scumbag. I also really like Boris and would love to have him as mayor of Toronto rather than the crack addict idiot we currently have (Rob Ford - just google him. You'll see.)
0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  sinkywinky  
 To:  Dave!!     
40697.30 In reply to 40697.27 
The somethingawful forums have a :clegg: emoticon: JTSZ5Gs.gif
0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  mr_swayzee  
 To:  Monsoir (PILOTDAN)      
40697.31 In reply to 40697.1 
Whichever party knows how to use the subjunctive "were" properly.

A problem shared is a problem halved, but a worry shared is a worry doubled
0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  Monsoir (PILOTDAN)   
 To:  mr_swayzee     
40697.32 In reply to 40697.31 
Well, that's annoying - I edited the title and it reset the vote count :(
+1/1
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  Some call me... (PSYCHO_GEEZER)  
 To:  Monsoir (PILOTDAN)      
40697.33 In reply to 40697.32 
It does that.  I think it's because you could change it to a question that makes voters look silly.
0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  Monsoir (PILOTDAN)   
 To:  Some call me... (PSYCHO_GEEZER)     
40697.34 In reply to 40697.33 
Hrmph.
0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  Dave!!  
 To:  Some call me... (PSYCHO_GEEZER)     
40697.35 In reply to 40697.33 
True, although it'd probably be useful if it gave you a clear warning first! (assuming that it didn't do this of course)
---

DR_claim_1_100px.jpg
0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  mr_swayzee  
 To:  Monsoir (PILOTDAN)      
40697.36 In reply to 40697.32 
I am very sorry...but also highly amused

A problem shared is a problem halved, but a worry shared is a worry doubled
0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  CHYRON (DSMITHHFX)  
 To:  Jo (JELLS)     
40697.37 In reply to 40697.29 
Well they finally got him.

----
"Allow me to channel Linus Torvalds a minute: 'What do you mean there wasn't a backup disk? Fucking kill yourself with a pipe wrench. I hate you, your mother was a whore and your dad was the neighbors dog. People like you make me sick.' "
0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

Message 40697.38 deleted 22 May 2015 10:14 by 53NORTH

 From:  fixrman  
 To:  Monsoir (PILOTDAN)      
40697.39 In reply to 40697.1 
I don't feel I know enough about your political system to comment, but I know if I was voting for someone in your system using my systems political definitions, I know who I would vote for.   :-S
 
  Did you ever see such a messed up situation in your whole life, son?
0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  ANT_THOMAS  
 To:  fixrman     
40697.40 In reply to 40697.39 
And that is?
0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  fixrman  
 To:  ANT_THOMAS     
40697.41 In reply to 40697.40 
The best person for the job.

The problem here in America is people tend to reduce the election to a single issue. So if they generally like a candidate but are in violent opposition to the candidate's stance on abortion, they will vote the way of their passion for abortion or against it. The fact that abortion should not be a political football is lost on them.

Americans also like to vote for milestones. The first black president comes to mind. I don't particularly care what a person's color is; BO could be yellow with purple plaid patterns - he'd still be an ineffective president. He is probably the most divisive president we have had in quite a long time. He appeals to those who would rather have a hand out rather than getting a hand up, those who would rather have something done for them rather than doing it for themselves.

I generally identify more with Republican ideals. Interestingly though, a Democratic president said, "Ask not what your country can do for you, ask what you can do for your country." Individuals, politicians alike should heed those words.

Unfortunately the Republicans and Democrats (reverse the order if it makes sense to do so) are actually mostly in agreement about what needs to be done in this country, they are just diametrically opposed in their ways of doing it. In the process they are in a power struggle to gain control to do it their way instead of in the old-fashioned, colonial days of persuasion, conviction and compromise. That is not to say that the early Statesmen did not resort to gamesmanship when it came to politics because they did. But in most cases they were not career politicians; this meant that they were actually serving for good of country rather than for their own gain such as is the case now. Now, prior to gaining power in office, most of our politicians don't have a lot of money or power but after a few years in the House or Senate they suddenly have millions available to them.

Unfortunately, it is all about the money. The answer isn't income redistribution, it is in political and campaign finance reform. Senators and Representatives should not be able to accept monetary gifts nor should they be as involved in the banks and stock market as they are. Greed and power serve to corrupt, and when the Constitution is bypassed, ignored or manipulated we have the recipe for continued erosion of the American political system. It has been going on for far too long and BO is making the most of exploitation and the Divide and Conquer mentality.

Unfortunately the pendulum always swings one end to the other and spends too little time in the middle. Because of the real or perceived problems with the BO administration, than many scandals and his insistence upon his way or the highway, I think the pendulum will swing Republican. But even that will likely be a mistake. And I am registered Republican. We need balance, as our political system was always meant to be. Personal agendas need to be cast aside for the betterment of the Country as a whole.
 
  Did you ever see such a messed up situation in your whole life, son?
+1/1
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  Peter (BOUGHTONP)  
 To:  fixrman     
40697.42 In reply to 40697.41 
> The best person for the job.

They're not on the ballot.

+3/3
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  fixrman  
 To:  Peter (BOUGHTONP)     
40697.43 In reply to 40697.42 
That's the bitch of it.
 
  Did you ever see such a messed up situation in your whole life, son?
0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

Reply to All    
 

1–20  21–40  41–43


Rate my interest:

Adjust text size : Smaller 10 Larger

Beehive Forum 1.5.2 |  FAQ |  Docs |  Support |  Donate! ©2002 - 2024 Project Beehive Forum

Forum Stats