Would you rather...

From:	Ken (SHIELDSIT)	23 May 2013 18:58
To:	Drew (X3N0PH0N)	68 of 104

40496.68 In reply to 40496.61
I am not, and yet somehow I've managed not to go on a shooting rampage against gay people! I know, pretty crazy but somehow I do it! My view is that it's not right, BUT if they want to do it and it doesn't harm me then go for it. What do I care? My complaint is against them getting the same benefits as a traditional marriage. ------------------------- I'm not sick, but I'm not well

-1/1

Reply Quote

More

From:	ANT_THOMAS	23 May 2013 19:00
To:	Ken (SHIELDSIT)	69 of 104

40496.69 In reply to 40496.68
Why shouldn't they? Are they not two normal people who love each other and want to be public and open about their relationship and have the legal safeguards that come with marriage like any other people do? ┌─────┐ │ │ │ ┌─┐ │ │ │ │ │ │ └─┘ │ │ │ │ ┌─┐ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ └─┘ └─┘

0/0

Reply Quote

More

From:	Ken (SHIELDSIT)	23 May 2013 19:01
To:	ANT_THOMAS	70 of 104

40496.70 In reply to 40496.67
I'll lay a gun on my desk, and when it jumps up and kills someone I'll send you 1 BILLION dollars, deal? ------------------------- I'm not sick, but I'm not well

0/0

Reply Quote

More

From:	Drew (X3N0PH0N)	23 May 2013 19:01
To:	Ken (SHIELDSIT)	71 of 104

40496.71 In reply to 40496.64
Hunting rifles are designed for hunting. Target pistols and rifles are designed for target shooting. Most guns owned in the US, and certainly the ones we're bothered about here, are neither of those. The guns we're concerned with are handguns, which are shit for hunting (with the exception of a few very high calibre revolvers and stuff); SMP/SMGs, which certainly have no non-combat purpose and assault rifles where... well, the clue is in the name. These are all designed specifically for harming people. That is what they are for, that is the guiding principle when designing them. , , , , , , , , , , `' (o,o) (o,o) (o,o) (o,o) (o,o) \ \|)__) \|)__) \|)__) \|)__) \|)__) ''`>-,--”-”---”-”---”-”---”-”---”-”---- ,'.*''`

0/0

Reply Quote

More

From:	Ken (SHIELDSIT)	23 May 2013 19:02
To:	Drew (X3N0PH0N)	72 of 104

40496.72 In reply to 40496.71
Most guns here are rifles and shotguns. I'd say by at least a 10:1 margin. The explosion in the past year with pistols has been driven by the talk of banning them. ------------------------- I'm not sick, but I'm not well

0/0

Reply Quote

More

From:	Drew (X3N0PH0N)	23 May 2013 19:04
To:	Ken (SHIELDSIT)	73 of 104

40496.73 In reply to 40496.68
quote: Where I get angry is the government telling me I can or can't do anything, I don't care what it is. As long as I'm not harming anyone they shouldn't have a say in what I do. quote: There should only be laws against things that harm other people. You can't actually mean those things and be against gay marriage, you realise that, right? So which is the lie? , , , , , , , , , , `' (o,o) (o,o) (o,o) (o,o) (o,o) \ \|)__) \|)__) \|)__) \|)__) \|)__) ''`>-,--”-”---”-”---”-”---”-”---”-”---- ,'.*''`

0/0

Reply Quote

More

From:	Drew (X3N0PH0N)	23 May 2013 19:05
To:	Ken (SHIELDSIT)	74 of 104

40496.74 In reply to 40496.72
Hunting rifles and shotguns (hunting shotguns, not combat shotguns) are fine. We have those here, too. I don't think anyone here is particularly bothered about those. We're talking about the handguns, SMP/SMGs and assault rifles. All of your guns are handguns, aren't they? , , , , , , , , , , `' (o,o) (o,o) (o,o) (o,o) (o,o) \ \|)__) \|)__) \|)__) \|)__) \|)__) ''`>-,--”-”---”-”---”-”---”-”---”-”---- ,'.*''`

0/0

Reply Quote

More

From:	Ken (SHIELDSIT)	23 May 2013 19:09
To:	ANT_THOMAS	75 of 104

40496.75 In reply to 40496.69
That's just my opinion on it. I think marriage should be between a man and a woman. The whole purpose, IMO, of a marriage is to have and raise children. ------------------------- I'm not sick, but I'm not well

0/0

Reply Quote

More

From:	Ken (SHIELDSIT)	23 May 2013 19:10
To:	Drew (X3N0PH0N)	76 of 104

40496.76 In reply to 40496.73
I'm not "against" gay marriage, I just don't think it's right. Right as in a natural thing. ------------------------- I'm not sick, but I'm not well

0/0

Reply Quote

More

From:	Drew (X3N0PH0N)	23 May 2013 19:11
To:	Ken (SHIELDSIT)	77 of 104

40496.77 In reply to 40496.75
Literally no credibility. Witness dismissed. Case closed. Guns are now illegal and gay marriage is mandatory. , , , , , , , , , , `' (o,o) (o,o) (o,o) (o,o) (o,o) \ \|)__) \|)__) \|)__) \|)__) \|)__) ''`>-,--”-”---”-”---”-”---”-”---”-”---- ,'.*''`

0/0

Reply Quote

More

From:	Drew (X3N0PH0N)	23 May 2013 19:11
To:	Ken (SHIELDSIT)	78 of 104

40496.78 In reply to 40496.76
Are blowjobs, BDSM and vibrators natural? Should they be illegal too? Are cars natural? How about hats? , , , , , , , , , , `' (o,o) (o,o) (o,o) (o,o) (o,o) \ \|)__) \|)__) \|)__) \|)__) \|)__) ''`>-,--”-”---”-”---”-”---”-”---”-”---- ,'.*''`

0/0

Reply Quote

More

From:	Ken (SHIELDSIT)	23 May 2013 19:13
To:	Drew (X3N0PH0N)	79 of 104

40496.79 In reply to 40496.74
I have 3 handguns and about 10 rifles and shotguns. ------------------------- I'm not sick, but I'm not well

0/0

Reply Quote

More

From:	ANT_THOMAS	23 May 2013 19:14
To:	Ken (SHIELDSIT)	80 of 104

40496.80 In reply to 40496.76
What right should gay couples have? Is there any form of legal recognition for gay couples in the US? ┌─────┐ │ │ │ ┌─┐ │ │ │ │ │ │ └─┘ │ │ │ │ ┌─┐ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ └─┘ └─┘

0/0

Reply Quote

More

From:	Ken (SHIELDSIT)	23 May 2013 19:16
To:	Drew (X3N0PH0N)	81 of 104

40496.81 In reply to 40496.77
What are you talking about? ------------------------- I'm not sick, but I'm not well

0/0

Reply Quote

More

From:	Ken (SHIELDSIT)	23 May 2013 19:20
To:	Drew (X3N0PH0N)	82 of 104

40496.82 In reply to 40496.78
I don't see anything wrong with blowjobs, or any sexual activity if you are both in agreement. I don't follow you on the other examples. A car was made to drive, try to sail across the ocean in one and it doesn't quite work. Hats are just badass and can be worn whenever you feel like it, especially if you have a gun. ------------------------- I'm not sick, but I'm not well

0/0

Reply Quote

More

From:	Ken (SHIELDSIT)	23 May 2013 19:21
To:	ANT_THOMAS	83 of 104

40496.83 In reply to 40496.80
There are some states that have made marriage legal, other than that they have the same rights as any other unmarried person. ------------------------- I'm not sick, but I'm not well

0/0

Reply Quote

More

From:	ANT_THOMAS	23 May 2013 19:26
To:	Ken (SHIELDSIT)	84 of 104

40496.84 In reply to 40496.83
But what rights do a gay couple have? Do you think a gay couple shouldn't have the same rights as a heterosexual couple? Ignore the religious and reproduction side of things for a minute. Shouldn't two people who want to be in a permanent legally recognised relationship be able to do so? ┌─────┐ │ │ │ ┌─┐ │ │ │ │ │ │ └─┘ │ │ │ │ ┌─┐ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ └─┘ └─┘

0/0

Reply Quote

More

From:	Ken (SHIELDSIT)	23 May 2013 19:30
To:	ANT_THOMAS	85 of 104

40496.85 In reply to 40496.84
If I ignore that then yes sure. And really I'm haven't been assigned a judge so people can do what they want, doesn't matter what I think does it? ------------------------- I'm not sick, but I'm not well

0/0

Reply Quote

More

From:	Manthorp	23 May 2013 19:38
To:	ANT_THOMAS	86 of 104

40496.86 In reply to 40496.84
Gay and lesbian couples are often adopters of those unwanted children who would otherwise grow up unloved and in care.That seems to me as socially useful a role as any other couple. "We all have flaws, and mine is being wicked." James Thurber, The Thirteen Clocks 1951 www.mynameislegion.org

+1/1

Reply Quote

More

From:	ANT_THOMAS	23 May 2013 20:07
To:	Manthorp	87 of 104

40496.87 In reply to 40496.86
I honestly couldn't agree more. In 10 years I would like to see the divorce rates of homosexual couples compared to heterosexual couples. My guessing is that it will probably be lower. ┌─────┐ │ │ │ ┌─┐ │ │ │ │ │ │ └─┘ │ │ │ │ ┌─┐ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ └─┘ └─┘

0/0

Reply Quote

More