Would you rather...

From:	Drew (X3N0PH0N)	23 May 2013 17:15
To:	Ken (SHIELDSIT)	42 of 104

40496.42 In reply to 40496.39
Taking this carrying around weapons thing to extremes. Say you had a barbecue and I was invited (as I'd better fucking be) and at the barbecue I carried around... a glaive, would that be ok? Or an RPG launcher? Or a hand grenade? I mean at what point does it become unacceptable to you? , , , , , , , , , , `' (o,o) (o,o) (o,o) (o,o) (o,o) \ \|)__) \|)__) \|)__) \|)__) \|)__) ''`>-,--”-”---”-”---”-”---”-”---”-”---- ,'.*''`

0/0

Reply Quote

More

From:	Ken (SHIELDSIT)	23 May 2013 17:20
To:	Drew (X3N0PH0N)	43 of 104

40496.43 In reply to 40496.42
A glaive might be cool! It depends how big it is. If you had a knife like Rambo I wouldn't think much about it, but if you carried a sword around I'd think you were a little fucked in the head. The other things I wouldn't think were acceptable. The items you listed are only used for military purposes, although I think some things like that are legal to own. I know you can own a tank as long as it can't fire. I have a friend who has a pretty good arsenal of mortar rounds too. Although I don't think you're allowed to have them. ------------------------- I'm not sick, but I'm not well

0/0

Reply Quote

More

From:	Drew (X3N0PH0N)	23 May 2013 17:25
To:	Ken (SHIELDSIT)	44 of 104

40496.44 In reply to 40496.43
quote: The items you listed are only used for military purposes So are guns you bunch of crazy fucking dicks. , , , , , , , , , , `' (o,o) (o,o) (o,o) (o,o) (o,o) \ \|)__) \|)__) \|)__) \|)__) \|)__) ''`>-,--”-”---”-”---”-”---”-”---”-”---- ,'.*''`

0/0

Reply Quote

More

From:	Ken (SHIELDSIT)	23 May 2013 17:29
To:	Drew (X3N0PH0N)	45 of 104

40496.45 In reply to 40496.44
Not here they aren't. We've been through this, and have come to the conclusion that it's a cultural thing right? If you grow up using and around guns your whole life you're used to them. I guess you /could/ be correct in a way. The reason we have the second amendment is to be able to protect ourselves from the government and are able to form a militia, so yeah you're right. Every American is a member of the military to a point I guess. ------------------------- I'm not sick, but I'm not well

0/0

Reply Quote

More

From:	koswix	23 May 2013 17:29
To:	Ken (SHIELDSIT)	46 of 104

40496.46 In reply to 40496.40
House foundations is really nothing more than pouring concrete with a robotic arm - not going to help you make a gun. Printing precision parts is a complete bitch - the plastics warp and change shape significantly over any distance (hence the incredibly short barrel on the Liberator), and the plastic really isn't strong enough for the job (notice how the amazing test firing was only a single shot?). ABS is far more elastic than steel, so it's never going to be possible to get a proper seal around the slug with ABS. Also the seal around the chamber isn't going to be very good with ABS either. I've no idea what the muzzle velocity is, but I bet it's not great. Also there's no rifling, as the ABS can't cut into the bullet, so with a tiny barrel and no rifling you're going to struggle to hit anything you're pointing at. I'd imagine the most likely outcome of firing a Liberator being pretty similar to holding a bullet in a vice and hitting it with a hammer. As for printed metals, they're currently done by using powdered metals and 'fusing' the particles together with a laser. The result is pretty brittle and the machines are ridiculously expensive, unlike the ABS printers you can get/build for a few hundred dollars. If you really wanted to manufacture a gun at home then all you need is a half decent workshop, a mill and a lathe. Add in a CNC lathe, CNC router, CNC mill and you could automate the process and make something half decent in a week or so. ▪ ┌────┐ ┌────┐ │ │ │ │ ▪ │ └────┘ │ │ ──┐ ┌── │ ▪ ┌──────┤ ▪ ▪ │ ┌┘ │ │ ▪ ┌─┤ └──┐ │ │ ┌──┘ │ │ │ ││ ││ │ ┌─┐ │ │ └─┼┤ └┴─┴───┘ │ │ │ ─┘│ │ │ │ ┌──────┐ └┬──────────┘ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ └───┘ └───┘ If Feds call you and say something bad on me, it may prove what I said are truth, they are afraid of it.

0/0

Reply Quote

More

From:	Ken (SHIELDSIT)	23 May 2013 17:33
To:	koswix	47 of 104

40496.47 In reply to 40496.46
Good points and true. But at the speed technology is moving I can't imagine not being able to print most things within 10 years or so. And really, you don't need more than a couple shots to do what you intend to do, or if you do you print a bag full 'o guns and go Matrix style. ------------------------- I'm not sick, but I'm not well

0/0

Reply Quote

More

From:	milko	23 May 2013 17:46
To:	ANT_THOMAS	48 of 104

40496.48 In reply to 40496.24
quote: One of the two people involved in the incident apparently had a gun. Albeit not a very good one, it blew his own finger off didn't it? Which just goes to show, gun control might be working quite well if the illegal ones can be so shit they're more dangerous to the shooter.

0/0

Reply Quote

More

From:	milko	23 May 2013 17:47
To:	Ken (SHIELDSIT)	49 of 104

40496.49 In reply to 40496.43
Maybe he wants to use the big sword to chop up bbq meat! It is a man's free choice to do that and you can take my burger-choppin' spadroon from my cold dead hands :)

0/0

Reply Quote

More

From:	Ken (SHIELDSIT)	23 May 2013 17:49
To:	milko	50 of 104

40496.50 In reply to 40496.49
That might be entertaining! OK, I'll allow it! ------------------------- I'm not sick, but I'm not well

0/0

Reply Quote

More

From:	koswix	23 May 2013 17:51
To:	Ken (SHIELDSIT)	51 of 104

40496.51 In reply to 40496.47

You said 5 years in your last post!

Never mind, Guess we'll just have to wait and see. *adds google calendar reminder for 23rd of May 2023*


 ▪                    
             ┌────┐    ┌────┐                      
          │    │    │    │ ▪                    
          │    └────┘    │                      
          │   ──┐  ┌──   │ ▪                    
   ┌──────┤    ▪    ▪    │                      
  ┌┘      │              │ ▪                    
┌─┤       └──┐  │  │  ┌──┘                      
│ │          │ ││  ││ │   ┌─┐                   
│ │          └─┼┤  └┴─┴───┘ │                   
│ │           ─┘│           │                   
│ │   ┌──────┐  └┬──────────┘                   
  │   │      │   │                              
  │   │      │   │                              
  └───┘      └───┘

If Feds call you and say something bad on me, it may prove what I said are truth, they are afraid of it.

0/0

Reply Quote

More

From:	Ken (SHIELDSIT)	23 May 2013 17:53
To:	koswix	52 of 104

40496.52 In reply to 40496.51
Yeah, I think we will have a printable, usable gun within 5 years. I think we will be printing a lot/most of the household things we use within 10 years. We will just hit Walmart/Target/Sears/Lowes/Whatever.com and download the plan for the item we want and it will start printing. ------------------------- I'm not sick, but I'm not well

0/0

Reply Quote

More

From:	koswix	23 May 2013 18:06
To:	Ken (SHIELDSIT)	53 of 104

40496.53 In reply to 40496.52

:'D


 ▪                    
             ┌────┐    ┌────┐                      
          │    │    │    │ ▪                    
          │    └────┘    │                      
          │   ──┐  ┌──   │ ▪                    
   ┌──────┤    ▪    ▪    │                      
  ┌┘      │              │ ▪                    
┌─┤       └──┐  │  │  ┌──┘                      
│ │          │ ││  ││ │   ┌─┐                   
│ │          └─┼┤  └┴─┴───┘ │                   
│ │           ─┘│           │                   
│ │   ┌──────┐  └┬──────────┘                   
  │   │      │   │                              
  │   │      │   │                              
  └───┘      └───┘

If Feds call you and say something bad on me, it may prove what I said are truth, they are afraid of it.

0/0

Reply Quote

More

From:	Drew (X3N0PH0N)	23 May 2013 18:31
To:	Ken (SHIELDSIT)	54 of 104

40496.54 In reply to 40496.45
Absolutely it's cultural and I accept that the historical context explains the situation, but it doesn't for a minute make it okay in my mind. I just accept that there's only so far rational arguments go when something is so culturally embedded. But no, that doesn't make it ok or beyond criticism. I think it represents and imbalance between the rights of the individual and collective rights. I think the right to live in a country where people aren't routinely walking around with weapons is far more important than an individual's right to 'protect themselves'. The second amendment is a collective right. The right, as you say, of the citizenry to protect themselves against a tyrannical government. But it talks specifically about a militia being well armed. It does not talk about people carrying guns to protect themselves against eachother. Nor does it talk about people carrying guns because guns are fun. Nor because guns make them feel powerful. Which I would think, if you're honest, covers the main reasons why the vast majority of people own guns. There's no rational argument for the carrying of guns that stands up to scrutiny. They clearly don't work as a deterrant since your rates of homocide, homocide with a gun and armed robbery are all higher. They don't work for self defence for the aforementioned reason and also because if you carry a gun then you're more likely to die should a violent situation ensue than if you don't. They wouldn't work for the overthrow of a tyrannical government because while you have, at best, AKs and AR-15s and so on, the government has tanks, f-22s, helicopter gunships, artillery and guided missiles. You carry guns because you enjoy carrying, owning and using guns. That's fine, I understand that. It can't be rationalised though and I don't think it's worth the price. , , , , , , , , , , `' (o,o) (o,o) (o,o) (o,o) (o,o) \ \|)__) \|)__) \|)__) \|)__) \|)__) ''`>-,--”-”---”-”---”-”---”-”---”-”---- ,'.*''`

+1/1

Reply Quote

More

From:	ANT_THOMAS	23 May 2013 18:34
To:	Ken (SHIELDSIT)	55 of 104

40496.55 In reply to 40496.52
And it will be shit compared to the mass produced stuff we currently buy! ┌─────┐ │ │ │ ┌─┐ │ │ │ │ │ │ └─┘ │ │ │ │ ┌─┐ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ └─┘ └─┘

0/0

Reply Quote

More

From:	ANT_THOMAS	23 May 2013 18:35
To:	milko	56 of 104

40496.56 In reply to 40496.48
Ha, yeah if it's a case of the guns that are sourceable being shit and converted so poorly that they're very dangerous to the user than that's fine by me! ┌─────┐ │ │ │ ┌─┐ │ │ │ │ │ │ └─┘ │ │ │ │ ┌─┐ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ └─┘ └─┘

0/0

Reply Quote

More

From:	Ken (SHIELDSIT)	23 May 2013 18:40
To:	Drew (X3N0PH0N)	57 of 104

40496.57 In reply to 40496.54
I agree with all your points, pretty much. Where I get angry is the government telling me I can or can't do anything, I don't care what it is. As long as I'm not harming anyone they shouldn't have a say in what I do. I think that's the view of most Americans and I think with that view it makes guns one of those things that we should be allowed to own and use as long as we don't harm anyone. ------------------------- I'm not sick, but I'm not well

0/0

Reply Quote

More

From:	Ken (SHIELDSIT)	23 May 2013 18:41
To:	ANT_THOMAS	58 of 104

40496.58 In reply to 40496.55
Yeah at first it will be. But can you picture the day where you can play that anti-piracy ad about downloading a car while you're downloading a car? It will be glorious! ------------------------- I'm not sick, but I'm not well

0/0

Reply Quote

More

From:	Drew (X3N0PH0N)	23 May 2013 18:44
To:	Ken (SHIELDSIT)	59 of 104

40496.59 In reply to 40496.57
But people with legally-owned guns are harming people. Guns are weapons. They are for harming people. While they can be used for target shooting that is not what they are for, that is not their designed purpose (in the vast majority of cases). That's like saying: I should be allowed to walk around strapped with C4. So long as I don't flick the switch then I'm not harming anyone so why not? , , , , , , , , , , `' (o,o) (o,o) (o,o) (o,o) (o,o) \ \|)__) \|)__) \|)__) \|)__) \|)__) ''`>-,--”-”---”-”---”-”---”-”---”-”---- ,'.*''`

0/0

Reply Quote

More

From:	ANT_THOMAS	23 May 2013 18:45
To:	Ken (SHIELDSIT)	60 of 104

40496.60 In reply to 40496.57
Do you think there should be no laws at all? or just the ones you like? ┌─────┐ │ │ │ ┌─┐ │ │ │ │ │ │ └─┘ │ │ │ │ ┌─┐ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ └─┘ └─┘

0/0

Reply Quote

More

From:	Drew (X3N0PH0N)	23 May 2013 18:46
To:	Ken (SHIELDSIT)	61 of 104

40496.61 In reply to 40496.57
(tangent: You're pro gay marriage then?) , , , , , , , , , , `' (o,o) (o,o) (o,o) (o,o) (o,o) \ \|)__) \|)__) \|)__) \|)__) \|)__) ''`>-,--”-”---”-”---”-”---”-”---”-”---- ,'.*''`

0/0

Reply Quote

More