Well, in all actuality - around these parts anyway - you just don't know who might have a gun on them. That acts as a deterrent. Do you think those guys would have accomplished what they did to that poor soldier had he been carrying a 9mm or a 45 on him? Of course they certainly might have still killed him because even people who carry guns get killed, jumped and can't defend themselves, stuff like that. But I think in most cases you would have a better chance with a gun than without.
I agree, sorta, about the assault weapons. It's so ingrained in us that we think we have the right to own any type of gun. I have friends who do shoot those types of things just for fun, so I can't say they have no purpose other than to kill, but that's their main purpose. I also have friends who own 50 cal. What is the purpose of a gun like that? Shooting a tank? Fucking crazy gun! But we are allowed to buy them so we do (not me, us in general).
I think if you stop and think about it, unless you're being silly, you can see the difference between an automatic weapon and a mortar or bomb or missile.
------------------------- I'm not sick, but I'm not well |