Idle Chit ChatNo shit Sherlock: my braynz num :(

 

Press Ctrl+Enter to quickly submit your post
Quick Reply  
 
 
  
 From:  Drew (X3N0PH0N)  
 To:  JonCooper     
39861.41 In reply to 39861.40 
There was no vastness of the universe, that's the point. There was nothing (no matter, no space, no time, no energy) and then there was a universe.
0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  JonCooper  
 To:  Drew (X3N0PH0N)     
39861.42 In reply to 39861.41 
and you think something caused that?

Jon
0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  ANT_THOMAS  
 To:  JonCooper     
39861.43 In reply to 39861.42 

Surely the matter came from somewhere, caused by something.

 

What that thing is is the debate to me.

0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  Drew (X3N0PH0N)  
 To:  JonCooper     
39861.44 In reply to 39861.42 
I don't know. All I'm saying is that it's not an unreasonable thing to believe.
0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  Peter (BOUGHTONP)  
 To:  Drew (X3N0PH0N)     
39861.45 In reply to 39861.41 
quote:
no matter, no space, no time, no energy


Oooh, I am so close to starting a universe. :D
0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  JonCooper  
 To:  ANT_THOMAS     
39861.46 In reply to 39861.43 
I'm sure the matter came from somewhere, what I dispute is that someone/something caused it all

Jon
0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  koswix  
 To:  Drew (X3N0PH0N)     
39861.47 In reply to 39861.33 
Less/fewer. Now shut up and fuck off :C



                                                
                                                
                                                
                           ▪                    
             ┌────┐    ┌────┐                      
          │    │    │    │ ▪                    
          │    └────┘    │                      
          │   ──┐  ┌──   │ ▪                    
   ┌──────┤    ▪    ▪    │                      
  ┌┘      │              │ ▪                    
┌─┤       └──┐  │  │  ┌──┘                      
│ │          │ ││  ││ │   ┌─┐                   
│ │          └─┼┤  └┴─┴───┘ │                   
│ │           ─┘│           │                   
│ │   ┌──────┐  └┬──────────┘                   
  │   │      │   │                              
  │   │      │   │                              
  └───┘      └───┘                              
If Feds call you and say something bad on me, it may prove what I said are truth, they are afraid of it.
0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  Drew (X3N0PH0N)  
 To:  koswix     
39861.48 In reply to 39861.47 
*Fewer/less
0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD)   
 To:  JonCooper     
39861.49 In reply to 39861.46 

More to the point, how do we know that there weren't numerous previous attempts at a 'big bang', that all failed for some reason, and this is just the one that 'got lucky'? Sort of a universal shit/wall situation.

 

There may have been previous universes that created and died before our own. Or indeed, numerous parallel universes right now.

 

I agree with you, the presence of this universe is not proof (or even supporting evidence) of a higher deity at work. But you can't tell the fucking catholics that.

bastard by name
bastard by nature

If Feds call you and say something bad on me, it may prove what I said are truth, they are afraid of it.

0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  graphitone  
 To:  ALL
39861.50 In reply to 39861.49 
Y'all need to shut up and listen to this man. The theory (some of) the physics boys have for the big bang and creation of the universe is from an offshoot of another universe.



I know it's long, but it's an interesting watch.
0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  Drew (X3N0PH0N)  
 To:  99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD)      
39861.51 In reply to 39861.49 
No one's suggesting it's proof.

We just have an effect without a cause (or at least that's one way of looking at it). So, if you do look at it that way, 'God' is one of the names for the imagined cause and/or objective. Belief ranges from the extreme impersonal, where it's just a concept, a handy placeholder to fill in a gap in reasoning (like 'i' in maths), to the extreme personal where it's an intelligent entity with a personality and 'being'.

Much like points on a euclidean plane, whether they exist or not is beside the point, the point is that they are useful.
0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD)   
 To:  graphitone     
39861.52 In reply to 39861.50 

I realise that it's an oversimplification of many complex ideas, but he irrevocably insulted even my meagre intelligence halfway through when he stated that where there's the internet there's prosperity and where there's no internet there's poverty.

 

Cart before horse, init?

bastard by name
bastard by nature

If Feds call you and say something bad on me, it may prove what I said are truth, they are afraid of it.

0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD)   
 To:  Drew (X3N0PH0N)     
39861.53 In reply to 39861.51 
No one's suggesting it's proof.

Ahh, right. I took this...
I don't think many people would object to the philosophical proposition that there was some intelligent impetus involved in the creation of the universe

...to mean that the presence of the universe was proof (or supporting evidence) of something other than pure chance (whether you call that god, higher deity, or Edith Ramsbottom is not important). Because I think that at least Jon and I object to your assertion.

bastard by name
bastard by nature

If Feds call you and say something bad on me, it may prove what I said are truth, they are afraid of it.

0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  Drew (X3N0PH0N)  
 To:  99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD)      
39861.54 In reply to 39861.53 
No, didn't mean to suggest 'proof' at all (because that would be ridiculous, because if there was proof everyone but the insane would believe, obviously).

I was just saying that I think most people would find the idea that God created the earth and all its life 6000 years ago pretty fucking stupid. Whereas I think most people would tolerate someone believing that there was a creator of the universe since no one knows any better.
0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  JonCooper  
 To:  Drew (X3N0PH0N)     
39861.55 In reply to 39861.54 
I would be willing to tolerate you believing that there was a creator of the universe if you could tolerate me believing it was a total random accident

Jon
0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  Drew (X3N0PH0N)  
 To:  JonCooper     
39861.56 In reply to 39861.55 
I have no fucking clue what I believe but I'm happy for you to believe what you like (hug)
0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD)   
 To:  JonCooper     
39861.57 In reply to 39861.55 
+1god

bastard by name
bastard by nature

If Feds call you and say something bad on me, it may prove what I said are truth, they are afraid of it.

0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  Peter (BOUGHTONP)  
 To:  JonCooper     
39861.58 In reply to 39861.55 
quote:
if you could tolerate me believing it was a total random accident

Nope, I can't tolerate that.

Accident means something was attempted and failed.

Which requires some entity to attempt something.

And that's not the intent of the idea you're attempting to express.

You can believe what you like, but use the correct words! :@
0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  JonCooper  
 To:  Peter (BOUGHTONP)     
39861.59 In reply to 39861.58 
quote:
Accident means something was attempted and failed.


uh, no

accident means something unintentional happened

I don't believe anyone/anything intentionally meant to create a universe

just a bunch of random stuff happened and later on we turned up to look at it

Jon
0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

Message 39861.60 deleted 22 May 2015 14:59 by 53NORTH

Reply to All  
 

1–20  21–40  41–60  61–74

Rate my interest:

Adjust text size : Smaller 10 Larger

Beehive Forum 1.5.2 |  FAQ |  Docs |  Support |  Donate! ©2002 - 2024 Project Beehive Forum

Forum Stats