Timelapse-me-do - Teh Forum

From:	koswix	1 May 2012 16:55
To:	koswix	4 of 81

39530.4 In reply to 39530.3

(also I've been doing the interval timer with the custom firmware available for the Canon series. I never thought I'd be running a CF on my camera (fail) )

                                                
                                                
                                                
                           ▪                    
             ┌────┐    ┌────┐                      
          │    │    │    │ ▪                    
          │    └────┘    │                      
          │   ──┐  ┌──   │ ▪                    
   ┌──────┤    ▪    ▪    │                      
  ┌┘      │              │ ▪                    
┌─┤       └──┐  │  │  ┌──┘                      
│ │          │ ││  ││ │   ┌─┐                   
│ │          └─┼┤  └┴─┴───┘ │                   
│ │           ─┘│           │                   
│ │   ┌──────┐  └┬──────────┘                   
  │   │      │   │                              
  │   │      │   │                              
  └───┘      └───┘

0/0

Reply Quote

More

From:	ANT_THOMAS	1 May 2012 16:59
To:	koswix	5 of 81

39530.5 In reply to 39530.4
Haha I've actually been tempted to get a second hand canon point and shoot to do exactly that. I've made a rotating tripod mount but it won't support a DSLR. ┌─────┐ │ │ │ ┌─┐ │ │ │ │ │ │ └─┘ │ │ │ │ ┌─┐ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ └─┘ └─┘

0/0

Reply Quote

More

From:	ANT_THOMAS	1 May 2012 16:59
To:	koswix	6 of 81

39530.6 In reply to 39530.4
Haha I've actually been tempted to get a second hand canon point and shoot to do exactly that. I've made a rotating tripod mount but it won't support a DSLR. ┌─────┐ │ │ │ ┌─┐ │ │ │ │ │ │ └─┘ │ │ │ │ ┌─┐ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ └─┘ └─┘

0/0

Reply Quote

More

From:	ANT_THOMAS	1 May 2012 17:00
To:	Matt	7 of 81

39530.7
That was me and my phones fault. Not Beehive. ┌─────┐ │ │ │ ┌─┐ │ │ │ │ │ │ └─┘ │ │ │ │ ┌─┐ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ └─┘ └─┘

0/0

Reply Quote

More

From:	koswix	1 May 2012 17:08
To:	ANT_THOMAS	8 of 81

39530.8 In reply to 39530.5

We were talking about a rotating mount with a stepper motor, and put it on the roof timed to follow the sun so that it's always in the same place in the frame.

                                                
                                                
                                                
                           ▪                    
             ┌────┐    ┌────┐                      
          │    │    │    │ ▪                    
          │    └────┘    │                      
          │   ──┐  ┌──   │ ▪                    
   ┌──────┤    ▪    ▪    │                      
  ┌┘      │              │ ▪                    
┌─┤       └──┐  │  │  ┌──┘                      
│ │          │ ││  ││ │   ┌─┐                   
│ │          └─┼┤  └┴─┴───┘ │                   
│ │           ─┘│           │                   
│ │   ┌──────┐  └┬──────────┘                   
  │   │      │   │                              
  │   │      │   │                              
  └───┘      └───┘

0/0

Reply Quote

More

From:	Killamarshian (HAL9001)	1 May 2012 17:56
To:	ALL	9 of 81

39530.9

I have done these 2.

http://youtu.be/Mlc1sTvKKEU

http://youtu.be/Ikqindz1qIY

But they are a bit of a con. I just upped the frame rate of the video taken. The first one was in HD. I then rendered in SD with a pan/zoom added.

0/0

Reply Quote

More

From:	koswix	1 May 2012 18:12
To:	Killamarshian (HAL9001)	10 of 81

39530.10 In reply to 39530.9

That's cool.

this is the best one I've managed so far:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FSUsN6tvMMA

I think the direction the clouds are moving is really important, side to side doesn't look so impressive as towards/away from the camera.

                                                
                                                
                                                
                           ▪                    
             ┌────┐    ┌────┐                      
          │    │    │    │ ▪                    
          │    └────┘    │                      
          │   ──┐  ┌──   │ ▪                    
   ┌──────┤    ▪    ▪    │                      
  ┌┘      │              │ ▪                    
┌─┤       └──┐  │  │  ┌──┘                      
│ │          │ ││  ││ │   ┌─┐                   
│ │          └─┼┤  └┴─┴───┘ │                   
│ │           ─┘│           │                   
│ │   ┌──────┐  └┬──────────┘                   
  │   │      │   │                              
  │   │      │   │                              
  └───┘      └───┘

0/0

Reply Quote

More

From:	Killamarshian (HAL9001)	1 May 2012 18:23
To:	koswix	11 of 81

39530.11 In reply to 39530.10
Excellent, looks like you picked a good day for it. Love the bubbling clouds

0/0

Reply Quote

More

From:	ANT_THOMAS	1 May 2012 18:31
To:	koswix	12 of 81

39530.12 In reply to 39530.10
This one being automated by my phone.... ┌─────┐ │ │ │ ┌─┐ │ │ │ │ │ │ └─┘ │ │ │ │ ┌─┐ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ └─┘ └─┘

0/0

Reply Quote

More

From:	99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD)	2 May 2012 06:56
To:	ANT_THOMAS	13 of 81

39530.13 In reply to 39530.2
Premiere = video Encore = audio bastard by name, bastard by nature

0/0

Reply Quote

More

From:	ANT_THOMAS	2 May 2012 07:45
To:	99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD)	14 of 81

39530.14 In reply to 39530.13
There's another video one then. More for authoring? ┌─────┐ │ │ │ ┌─┐ │ │ │ │ │ │ └─┘ │ │ │ │ ┌─┐ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ └─┘ └─┘

0/0

Reply Quote

More

From:	ANT_THOMAS	2 May 2012 08:37
To:	ANT_THOMAS	15 of 81

39530.15 In reply to 39530.14
After Effects is what I was thinking of. Not exactly authoring. ┌─────┐ │ │ │ ┌─┐ │ │ │ │ │ │ └─┘ │ │ │ │ ┌─┐ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ └─┘ └─┘

0/0

Reply Quote

More

From:	99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD)	2 May 2012 09:00
To:	ANT_THOMAS	16 of 81

39530.16 In reply to 39530.15
Yeah, AE is more for compositing. You could do time-lapse in it, I guess, but it's like using a sledgehammer to crack a nut. And a pretty awkward sledgehammer at that. bastard by name, bastard by nature

0/0

Reply Quote

More

From:	ANT_THOMAS	2 May 2012 09:07
To:	99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD)	17 of 81

39530.17 In reply to 39530.16

Yeah, definitely not the right tool.

I'd like to learn to use it a bit to even just add simple text overlays to things.

0/0

Reply Quote

More

From:	milko	2 May 2012 09:20
To:	ANT_THOMAS	18 of 81

39530.18 In reply to 39530.17
it's very easy to use to do that, although you'd be barely scraping the feature set - most video editors let you do that already built in.

0/0

Reply Quote

More

From:	ANT_THOMAS	2 May 2012 09:29
To:	milko	19 of 81

39530.19 In reply to 39530.18
Yeah, definitely very basic. With a few swooshy in out things of text. Nothing fancy. ┌─────┐ │ │ │ ┌─┐ │ │ │ │ │ │ └─┘ │ │ │ │ ┌─┐ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ └─┘ └─┘

0/0

Reply Quote

More

From:	99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD)	2 May 2012 09:31
To:	ANT_THOMAS	20 of 81

39530.20 In reply to 39530.19
Like Milko says, most video editors can do that with far less pain. bastard by name, bastard by nature

0/0

Reply Quote

More

From:	ANT_THOMAS	2 May 2012 09:33
To:	99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD)	21 of 81

39530.21 In reply to 39530.20

Indeed. Any suggestions?

I always end up going back to whatever I've got installed from Adobe CS because half of the editors out there seem completely shit, or can't handle HD/H264 properly. Or maybe I haven't looked into this enough.

0/0

Reply Quote

More

From:	99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD)	2 May 2012 10:32
To:	ANT_THOMAS	22 of 81

39530.22 In reply to 39530.21
Unfortunately (for you, not me), I use FCP, so that doesn't help. But any of the main Windows competition (Premiere, Vegas etc) should have demo or laddish versions to play with. bastard by name, bastard by nature

0/0

Reply Quote

More

From:	koswix	3 May 2012 15:04
To:	ALL	23 of 81

39530.23

Whitby to Edinburgh, a 4 hour drive in 1 minute 6 seconds.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yi82KaKVbCw

                                                
                                                
                                                
                           ▪                    
             ┌────┐    ┌────┐                      
          │    │    │    │ ▪                    
          │    └────┘    │                      
          │   ──┐  ┌──   │ ▪                    
   ┌──────┤    ▪    ▪    │                      
  ┌┘      │              │ ▪                    
┌─┤       └──┐  │  │  ┌──┘                      
│ │          │ ││  ││ │   ┌─┐                   
│ │          └─┼┤  └┴─┴───┘ │                   
│ │           ─┘│           │                   
│ │   ┌──────┐  └┬──────────┘                   
  │   │      │   │                              
  │   │      │   │                              
  └───┘      └───┘

0/0

Reply Quote

More