Timelapse-me-do - Teh Forum

From:	Drew (X3N0PH0N)	16 May 2012 23:03
To:	ANT_THOMAS	34 of 81

39530.34 In reply to 39530.32
Stick-on lead :\| You disgust me :\| , , , , , , , , , , `' (o,o) (o,o) (o,o) (o,o) (o,o) \ \|)__) \|)__) \|)__) \|)__) \|)__) ''`>-,--”-”---”-”---”-”---”-”---”-”---- ,'.*''`

0/0

Reply Quote

More

From:	ANT_THOMAS	16 May 2012 23:17
To:	Drew (X3N0PH0N)	35 of 81

39530.35 In reply to 39530.34
:(( ┌─────┐ │ │ │ ┌─┐ │ │ │ │ │ │ └─┘ │ │ │ │ ┌─┐ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ └─┘ └─┘

0/0

Reply Quote

More

From:	Drew (X3N0PH0N)	16 May 2012 23:47
To:	ANT_THOMAS	36 of 81

39530.36 In reply to 39530.35
(hugleft) , , , , , , , , , , `' (o,o) (o,o) (o,o) (o,o) (o,o) \ \|)__) \|)__) \|)__) \|)__) \|)__) ''`>-,--”-”---”-”---”-”---”-”---”-”---- ,'.*''`

0/0

Reply Quote

More

From:	af (CAER)	17 May 2012 09:33
To:	Drew (X3N0PH0N)	37 of 81

39530.37 In reply to 39530.34

That shit makes it really god damned hard to clean windows :@

/ex-windowcleaner

0/0

Reply Quote

More

From:	ANT_THOMAS	24 May 2012 17:23
To:	ALL	38 of 81

39530.38
So many funny looks doing time lapse in a city centre during rush hour! ┌─────┐ │ │ │ ┌─┐ │ │ │ │ │ │ └─┘ │ │ │ │ ┌─┐ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ └─┘ └─┘

0/0

Reply Quote

More

From:	ANT_THOMAS	11 Jun 2012 10:50
To:	ALL	39 of 81

39530.39
Some more test. All 1080p. A night/day test with my Canon Ixus 220 HS running CHDK... And some clouds testing my window mount and my Pentax K200D... ┌─────┐ │ │ │ ┌─┐ │ │ │ │ │ │ └─┘ │ │ │ │ ┌─┐ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ └─┘ └─┘

0/0

Reply Quote

More

From:	af (CAER)	11 Jun 2012 11:41
To:	ANT_THOMAS	40 of 81

39530.40 In reply to 39530.39

One thing I read is that for smooth motion you should aim to have a shutter speed of half the time between frames. So, if you're shooting at 24 frames per second you use 1/48th (1/50th is close enough) shutter, and if you're shooting 1 frame per minute, you use a 30 second shutter speed. It results in nice motion blur without things looking too smeared.

Obviously 720 exposures of 30 seconds (for 12 hours of real time) is gonna be pretty hard on the camera battery.

0/0

Reply Quote

More

From:	ANT_THOMAS	11 Jun 2012 11:45
To:	af (CAER)	41 of 81

39530.41 In reply to 39530.40

Yeah, I've been looking into the best way to make things as smooth as possible whilst not over/under exposing.

I've bought an AC adapter for my Ixus. Been looking for one for my K200D that is a reasonable price, not managed to yet.

0/0

Reply Quote

More

From:	af (CAER)	11 Jun 2012 11:47
To:	ANT_THOMAS	42 of 81

39530.42 In reply to 39530.41
Might be worth seeing how many long exposure frames you can get out of the K200D battery. Plus, there's nothing stopping you from splitting the shooting – it doesn't have to be a single 1-minute-long take in the final video, you could shoot at different angles or whatever.

0/0

Reply Quote

More

From:	ANT_THOMAS	11 Jun 2012 11:52
To:	af (CAER)	43 of 81

39530.43 In reply to 39530.42

I can get quite a lot. Bought some Uniross Hybrios a bit back that are bloody great. Fairly certain I managed over 4000 frames on a single set. (Just shooting JPEG)

Having an AC adapter isn't going to be too much use outside the house anyway!

0/0

Reply Quote

More

From:	af (CAER)	11 Jun 2012 11:53
To:	ANT_THOMAS	44 of 81

39530.44 In reply to 39530.43
Well, short exposures don't eat a lot of battery; I'd be surprised if you that many 30-second frames.

0/0

Reply Quote

More

From:	ANT_THOMAS	11 Jun 2012 11:55
To:	af (CAER)	45 of 81

39530.45 In reply to 39530.44
Oh, definitely not for 30 seconds frames, that would be a killer! ┌─────┐ │ │ │ ┌─┐ │ │ │ │ │ │ └─┘ │ │ │ │ ┌─┐ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ └─┘ └─┘

0/0

Reply Quote

More

From:	Ken (SHIELDSIT)	11 Jun 2012 17:09
To:	ANT_THOMAS	46 of 81

39530.46 In reply to 39530.39

Wow!

The first one shows me that it is really dreary there! There was one time there when the sun really came out!

The second is amazing. It looks like the clouds just form from thin air. I'm sure they do I guess, but I never really thought about it.

Good stuff Ant!

0/0

Reply Quote

More

From:	Drew (X3N0PH0N)	11 Jun 2012 17:22
To:	Ken (SHIELDSIT)	47 of 81

39530.47 In reply to 39530.46
The sun? What's that? , , , , , , , , , , `' (o,o) (o,o) (o,o) (o,o) (o,o) \ \|)__) \|)__) \|)__) \|)__) \|)__) ''`>-,--”-”---”-”---”-”---”-”---”-”---- ,'.*''`

0/0

Reply Quote

More

From:	Ken (SHIELDSIT)	11 Jun 2012 17:23
To:	Drew (X3N0PH0N)	48 of 81

39530.48 In reply to 39530.47

:) Isn't he the male type person your wife gives you?

0/0

Reply Quote

More

From:	Drew (X3N0PH0N)	11 Jun 2012 17:24
To:	Ken (SHIELDSIT)	49 of 81

39530.49 In reply to 39530.48
Wife? What is that? , , , , , , , , , , `' (o,o) (o,o) (o,o) (o,o) (o,o) \ \|)__) \|)__) \|)__) \|)__) \|)__) ''`>-,--”-”---”-”---”-”---”-”---”-”---- ,'.*''`

0/0

Reply Quote

More

From:	ANT_THOMAS	11 Jun 2012 18:06
To:	Ken (SHIELDSIT)	50 of 81

39530.50 In reply to 39530.46
Dreary? That was a decent day. Here's a day-light drive. It seems a frame every 2 seconds is reasonable in the motorway. ┌─────┐ │ │ │ ┌─┐ │ │ │ │ │ │ └─┘ │ │ │ │ ┌─┐ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ └─┘ └─┘

0/0

Reply Quote

More

From:	Matt	11 Jun 2012 19:15
To:	ALL	51 of 81

39530.51
I did these a couple of weeks ago, using Android ICS / Cyanogenmod stock camera with 1fps timelapse. Need a longer distance to drive to make these better.

0/0

Reply Quote

More

From:	ANT_THOMAS	11 Jun 2012 19:26
To:	Matt	52 of 81

39530.52 In reply to 39530.51

A few decent roads though!

I want to do something when I go on a roadtrip to Liege, Hockenheim, Amsterdam, Brugge and Lille this summer.

Just need to find a suitable in car charger/power supply and do some maths to make sure my 16GB card is big enough.

1fps looks good, but I fear it'd give me too many photos and be too long for a really long trip. Though I have been using a lower resolution (but bigger than 1920x1080 to allow for enough cropping)

0/0

Reply Quote

More

From:	af (CAER)	11 Jun 2012 19:41
To:	ANT_THOMAS	53 of 81

39530.53 In reply to 39530.52
I was gonna say, you don't need much resolution for video - I think a 4GB card holds like 4000 frames at just-over-full-HD res.

0/0

Reply Quote

More