Timelapse-me-do - Teh Forum

SoftwareTimelapse-me-do

From:	ANT_THOMAS	1 May 2012 16:48
To:	koswix	2 of 81

39530.2 In reply to 39530.1

I've done mine via FFMPEG and the command line. Because I'm hardcore like that. And obviously no processing that way. It outputs a nice H264 encoded video though. But not necessarily great if you want to edit after due to it already being compressed.

What sort of processing would you like? You could make the timelapse then edit the outputted video in whatever you like for videos. I've found proper editors and whatever the Adobe editor is to be quite complex. Is it encore or premiere? Or both. Not initially easy to do simple editing. Certainly is after you've read around, but then it's forgotten easily when you come to play again a few months down the line.

Keep meaning to do some more timelapse videos. Need to get off my arse and actually do them. It's not like they're difficult. Set camera up, wait for x minutes, move on.

0/0

More

From:	koswix	1 May 2012 16:54
To:	ANT_THOMAS	3 of 81

39530.3 In reply to 39530.2

Was thinking of balancing the lighting/making it a smoother change/morphing or whatever.

Also want to do something to bring the clouds out all funny, solarise maybe. Could batch process that in irfanview I guess before building.

I've done a few over the last week or so, and today I drove back from Whitby with the camera on the dashboard. I've just run it into a video and I appear to have a rather lovely view of the windscreen wiper :'(

                                                
                                                
                                                
                           ▪                    
             ┌────┐    ┌────┐                      
          │    │    │    │ ▪                    
          │    └────┘    │                      
          │   ──┐  ┌──   │ ▪                    
   ┌──────┤    ▪    ▪    │                      
  ┌┘      │              │ ▪                    
┌─┤       └──┐  │  │  ┌──┘                      
│ │          │ ││  ││ │   ┌─┐                   
│ │          └─┼┤  └┴─┴───┘ │                   
│ │           ─┘│           │                   
│ │   ┌──────┐  └┬──────────┘                   
  │   │      │   │                              
  │   │      │   │                              
  └───┘      └───┘

0/0

More

From:	koswix	1 May 2012 16:55
To:	koswix	4 of 81

39530.4 In reply to 39530.3

(also I've been doing the interval timer with the custom firmware available for the Canon series. I never thought I'd be running a CF on my camera (fail) )

                                                
                                                
                                                
                           ▪                    
             ┌────┐    ┌────┐                      
          │    │    │    │ ▪                    
          │    └────┘    │                      
          │   ──┐  ┌──   │ ▪                    
   ┌──────┤    ▪    ▪    │                      
  ┌┘      │              │ ▪                    
┌─┤       └──┐  │  │  ┌──┘                      
│ │          │ ││  ││ │   ┌─┐                   
│ │          └─┼┤  └┴─┴───┘ │                   
│ │           ─┘│           │                   
│ │   ┌──────┐  └┬──────────┘                   
  │   │      │   │                              
  │   │      │   │                              
  └───┘      └───┘

0/0

More

From:	ANT_THOMAS	1 May 2012 16:59
To:	koswix	5 of 81

39530.5 In reply to 39530.4
Haha I've actually been tempted to get a second hand canon point and shoot to do exactly that. I've made a rotating tripod mount but it won't support a DSLR. ┌─────┐ │ │ │ ┌─┐ │ │ │ │ │ │ └─┘ │ │ │ │ ┌─┐ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ └─┘ └─┘

0/0

More

From:	ANT_THOMAS	1 May 2012 16:59
To:	koswix	6 of 81

39530.6 In reply to 39530.4
Haha I've actually been tempted to get a second hand canon point and shoot to do exactly that. I've made a rotating tripod mount but it won't support a DSLR. ┌─────┐ │ │ │ ┌─┐ │ │ │ │ │ │ └─┘ │ │ │ │ ┌─┐ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ └─┘ └─┘

0/0

More

From:	ANT_THOMAS	1 May 2012 17:00
To:	Matt	7 of 81

39530.7
That was me and my phones fault. Not Beehive. ┌─────┐ │ │ │ ┌─┐ │ │ │ │ │ │ └─┘ │ │ │ │ ┌─┐ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ └─┘ └─┘

0/0

More

From:	koswix	1 May 2012 17:08
To:	ANT_THOMAS	8 of 81

39530.8 In reply to 39530.5

We were talking about a rotating mount with a stepper motor, and put it on the roof timed to follow the sun so that it's always in the same place in the frame.

                                                
                                                
                                                
                           ▪                    
             ┌────┐    ┌────┐                      
          │    │    │    │ ▪                    
          │    └────┘    │                      
          │   ──┐  ┌──   │ ▪                    
   ┌──────┤    ▪    ▪    │                      
  ┌┘      │              │ ▪                    
┌─┤       └──┐  │  │  ┌──┘                      
│ │          │ ││  ││ │   ┌─┐                   
│ │          └─┼┤  └┴─┴───┘ │                   
│ │           ─┘│           │                   
│ │   ┌──────┐  └┬──────────┘                   
  │   │      │   │                              
  │   │      │   │                              
  └───┘      └───┘

0/0

More

From:	Killamarshian (HAL9001)	1 May 2012 17:56
To:	ALL	9 of 81

I have done these 2.

http://youtu.be/Mlc1sTvKKEU

http://youtu.be/Ikqindz1qIY

But they are a bit of a con. I just upped the frame rate of the video taken. The first one was in HD. I then rendered in SD with a pan/zoom added.

0/0

More

From:	koswix	1 May 2012 18:12
To:	Killamarshian (HAL9001)	10 of 81

39530.10 In reply to 39530.9

That's cool.

this is the best one I've managed so far:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FSUsN6tvMMA

I think the direction the clouds are moving is really important, side to side doesn't look so impressive as towards/away from the camera.

                                                
                                                
                                                
                           ▪                    
             ┌────┐    ┌────┐                      
          │    │    │    │ ▪                    
          │    └────┘    │                      
          │   ──┐  ┌──   │ ▪                    
   ┌──────┤    ▪    ▪    │                      
  ┌┘      │              │ ▪                    
┌─┤       └──┐  │  │  ┌──┘                      
│ │          │ ││  ││ │   ┌─┐                   
│ │          └─┼┤  └┴─┴───┘ │                   
│ │           ─┘│           │                   
│ │   ┌──────┐  └┬──────────┘                   
  │   │      │   │                              
  │   │      │   │                              
  └───┘      └───┘

0/0

More

From:	Killamarshian (HAL9001)	1 May 2012 18:23
To:	koswix	11 of 81

39530.11 In reply to 39530.10
Excellent, looks like you picked a good day for it. Love the bubbling clouds

0/0

More

From:	ANT_THOMAS	1 May 2012 18:31
To:	koswix	12 of 81

39530.12 In reply to 39530.10
This one being automated by my phone.... ┌─────┐ │ │ │ ┌─┐ │ │ │ │ │ │ └─┘ │ │ │ │ ┌─┐ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ └─┘ └─┘

0/0

More

From:	99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD)	2 May 2012 06:56
To:	ANT_THOMAS	13 of 81

39530.13 In reply to 39530.2
Premiere = video Encore = audio bastard by name, bastard by nature

0/0

More

From:	ANT_THOMAS	2 May 2012 07:45
To:	99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD)	14 of 81

39530.14 In reply to 39530.13
There's another video one then. More for authoring? ┌─────┐ │ │ │ ┌─┐ │ │ │ │ │ │ └─┘ │ │ │ │ ┌─┐ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ └─┘ └─┘

0/0

More

From:	ANT_THOMAS	2 May 2012 08:37
To:	ANT_THOMAS	15 of 81

39530.15 In reply to 39530.14
After Effects is what I was thinking of. Not exactly authoring. ┌─────┐ │ │ │ ┌─┐ │ │ │ │ │ │ └─┘ │ │ │ │ ┌─┐ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ └─┘ └─┘

0/0

More

From:	99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD)	2 May 2012 09:00
To:	ANT_THOMAS	16 of 81

39530.16 In reply to 39530.15
Yeah, AE is more for compositing. You could do time-lapse in it, I guess, but it's like using a sledgehammer to crack a nut. And a pretty awkward sledgehammer at that. bastard by name, bastard by nature

0/0

More

From:	ANT_THOMAS	2 May 2012 09:07
To:	99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD)	17 of 81

39530.17 In reply to 39530.16

Yeah, definitely not the right tool.

I'd like to learn to use it a bit to even just add simple text overlays to things.

0/0

More

From:	milko	2 May 2012 09:20
To:	ANT_THOMAS	18 of 81

39530.18 In reply to 39530.17
it's very easy to use to do that, although you'd be barely scraping the feature set - most video editors let you do that already built in.

0/0

More

From:	ANT_THOMAS	2 May 2012 09:29
To:	milko	19 of 81

39530.19 In reply to 39530.18
Yeah, definitely very basic. With a few swooshy in out things of text. Nothing fancy. ┌─────┐ │ │ │ ┌─┐ │ │ │ │ │ │ └─┘ │ │ │ │ ┌─┐ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ └─┘ └─┘

0/0

More

From:	99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD)	2 May 2012 09:31
To:	ANT_THOMAS	20 of 81

39530.20 In reply to 39530.19
Like Milko says, most video editors can do that with far less pain. bastard by name, bastard by nature

0/0

More

From:	ANT_THOMAS	2 May 2012 09:33
To:	99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD)	21 of 81

39530.21 In reply to 39530.20

Indeed. Any suggestions?

I always end up going back to whatever I've got installed from Adobe CS because half of the editors out there seem completely shit, or can't handle HD/H264 properly. Or maybe I haven't looked into this enough.

0/0

More

Reply to All

1–20 21–40 … 81

Adjust text size : Smaller 10 Larger

Beehive Forum 1.5.2 | FAQ | Docs | Support | Donate!

©2002 - 2024 Project Beehive Forum

Forum Stats