Ranter's CornerThis is BS

 

Press Ctrl+Enter to quickly submit your post
Quick Reply  
 
 
  
 From:  Drew (X3N0PH0N)  
 To:  Peter (BOUGHTONP)     
38437.41 In reply to 38437.40 
quote:
Especially not a Land Rover - which was designed to rove land


They should use that in their advertising. "Got land to rove? Buy a landrover!".

0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  Monsoir (PILOTDAN)  
 To:  ANT_THOMAS     
38437.42 In reply to 38437.34 
Not that I've ever heard of. You'd hear it if it needed it for some reason.
0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  ANT_THOMAS  
 To:  Monsoir (PILOTDAN)     
38437.43 In reply to 38437.42 
Fair enough. Using higher RON fuel always resulted in an extra 5 mph on the top speed!
0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  CHYRON (DSMITHHFX)  
 To:  koswix     
38437.44 In reply to 38437.37 
Donald Rumsfeld?

----
"Cellphones have turned people blessed with opposing thumbs and ten digits into monkeys hammering on a 2-inch touchscreen with all the speed and grace of a retarded badger molesting a tennis ball."
0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  Ken (SHIELDSIT)   
 To:  Drew (X3N0PH0N)     
38437.45 In reply to 38437.41 
I was going to use it as my signature. I laughed my ass off when Peter posted that!


0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  fixrman  
 To:  Peter (BOUGHTONP)     
38437.46 In reply to 38437.40 
I don't know about no car. I had a car from 1987, namely a Ford Escort, that was incredible good on fuel. 40MPG on a trip was not uncommon and at least 30 MPG local driving was the norm.

A large SUV is of course quite lousy on fuel, but fully loaded with family, luggage and a rack with 4 bikes is an impossible task for the Escort. Plus if there is a creek to be crossed, the Escort would have to float it.


    Did you ever see such a messed up situation in your whole life, son?

0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  koswix  
 To:  fixrman     
38437.47 In reply to 38437.39 
And?


GIVE ME EYERON OR! :@ msg:38140.1
0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  JonCooper  
 To:  fixrman     
38437.48 In reply to 38437.46 
you get shit mpg, I get 38+ round town in my landrover

Jon
0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  fixrman  
 To:  JonCooper     
38437.49 In reply to 38437.48 
Good for you. A 4-banger, no doubt?


    Did you ever see such a messed up situation in your whole life, son?

0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  PNCOOL  
 To:  koswix     
38437.50 In reply to 38437.24 
Ah, I didn't know that. Not particularly a fast car (although it is quick for what it is), but all EU cars are made to run on 95 RON fuel. Anything lower than that and most cars would run pretty lumpy I would have thought, with them pre-detonating the fuel/air mix.

0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  PNCOOL  
 To:  Monsoir (PILOTDAN)     
38437.51 In reply to 38437.25 
Indeed, but I wouldn't run 91 RON fuel.

0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  PNCOOL  
 To:  ANT_THOMAS     
38437.52 In reply to 38437.32 
Just to confuse the issue, diesel isn't usually graded by RON but by cetane instead.

0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  Monsoir (PILOTDAN)  
 To:  PNCOOL     
38437.53 In reply to 38437.51 
I would if it was 2004 prices.
0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  JonCooper  
 To:  ALL
38437.54 
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-manchester-13326275

Jon
0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  Monsoir (PILOTDAN)  
 To:  JonCooper     
38437.55 In reply to 38437.54 
Let's face it - its like a heroine addict protesting to their dealer...
0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  af (CAER)  
 To:  JonCooper     
38437.56 In reply to 38437.48 
Don't forget American gallons are bigger than the ones we use, so their MPG numbers are lower for the same amount of fuel.
0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  Drew (X3N0PH0N)  
 To:  af (CAER)     
38437.57 In reply to 38437.56 
God I love Imperial.

0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  Manthorp  
 To:  Drew (X3N0PH0N)     
38437.58 In reply to 38437.57 
Imperialist.

"We all have flaws, and mine is being wicked."
James Thurber, The Thirteen Clocks 1951

0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  koswix  
 To:  af (CAER)     
38437.59 In reply to 38437.56 
thought they were smaller?


GIVE ME EYERON OR! :@ msg:38140.1
0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  Ken (SHIELDSIT)   
 To:  Drew (X3N0PH0N)     
38437.60 In reply to 38437.57 
(fail)


0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

Reply to All  
 

1–20  21–40  41–60  61–65

Rate my interest:

Adjust text size : Smaller 10 Larger

Beehive Forum 1.5.2 |  FAQ |  Docs |  Support |  Donate! ©2002 - 2024 Project Beehive Forum

Forum Stats