Teh Mine - Teh Forum

From:	Mouse	1 Mar 2011 11:48
To:	ALL	990 of 3934

38140.990
LET'S MAKE ATLANTIS! Roses are bollocks, Violets are crud, I hate bloody flowers, And much prefer mud.

0/0

Reply Quote

More

From:	JonCooper	1 Mar 2011 11:51
To:	ALL	991 of 3934

38140.991

I think someone (drew) should make a submarine

with a hatch in the bottom, and air inside

Jon

0/0

Reply Quote

More

From:	Drew (X3N0PH0N)	1 Mar 2011 11:56
To:	JonCooper	992 of 3934

38140.992 In reply to 38140.991
I shall do this if Jon says it's ok.

0/0

Reply Quote

More

From:	af (CAER)	1 Mar 2011 12:37
To:	Drew (X3N0PH0N)	993 of 3934

38140.993 In reply to 38140.992
I think we should hollow out some sea, build it in dry dock, then put the sea back when we're done. FORJ Forum

0/0

Reply Quote

More

From:	Drew (X3N0PH0N)	1 Mar 2011 13:07
To:	af (CAER)	994 of 3934

38140.994 In reply to 38140.993
WHERE'S THE CHALLENGE IN THAT?!?!?!?!?!?!!!?!!?

0/0

Reply Quote

More

From:	af (CAER)	1 Mar 2011 13:09
To:	Drew (X3N0PH0N)	995 of 3934

38140.995 In reply to 38140.994
Ok, I challenge you to build a submarine in LAVA :Y FORJ Forum

0/0

Reply Quote

More

From:	Drew (X3N0PH0N)	1 Mar 2011 13:11
To:	af (CAER)	996 of 3934

38140.996 In reply to 38140.995
:D One OUCH block OUCH at OUCH a OUCH time OUCH

0/0

Reply Quote

More

From:	af (CAER)	1 Mar 2011 13:34
To:	Drew (X3N0PH0N)	997 of 3934

38140.997 In reply to 38140.996
Actually, what's the lava equivalent of the word "marine"? lavine? Build a sublavine! FORJ Forum

0/0

Reply Quote

More

From:	Serg (NUKKLEAR)	1 Mar 2011 14:15
To:	af (CAER)	998 of 3934

38140.998 In reply to 38140.989

Thank you Caer, I now feel proud of my idea.

So secret underwater/underlava layer it is then. I reckon we should build stuff first, then flood the place otherwise it'll become a lil' difficult. Why did Notch remove the usefulness of sponges? :-@

[...Insert Brain Here...]

0/0

Reply Quote

More

From:	JonCooper	1 Mar 2011 15:11
To:	Serg (NUKKLEAR)	999 of 3934

38140.999 In reply to 38140.998

I'd like to know why he changed water - it used to be that you could dig into the sea and water would flow untill it all reached sea level - not anymore

I'd also like to to know why I didn't have this information untill after I had dug a big/long aqueduct to flood 'the hole'

Jon

0/0

Reply Quote

More

From:	af (CAER)	1 Mar 2011 15:20
To:	JonCooper	1000 of 3934

38140.1000 In reply to 38140.999
I'd guess he changed it because otherwise underwater springs would fill up caverns to their level, basically flooding most of them completely. It does make filling things with water a bit more awkward now, but on the other hand it also means a leak is much less damaging and annoying to fix. FORJ Forum

0/0

Reply Quote

More

From:	koswix	1 Mar 2011 15:30
To:	JonCooper	1001 of 3934

38140.1001 In reply to 38140.999
It's never acted like that since I've played it :-/ GIVE ME EYERON OR! :@ msg:38140.1

0/0

Reply Quote

More

From:	Serg (NUKKLEAR)	1 Mar 2011 15:33
To:	JonCooper	1002 of 3934

38140.1002 In reply to 38140.999
Actually as they said, that's a good thing, otherwise things would get filled up everywhere, and personally I'd hate that... And sponges ffs, they were a great idea :( [...Insert Brain Here...]

0/0

Reply Quote

More

From:	Peter (BOUGHTONP)	1 Mar 2011 15:58
To:	af (CAER)	1003 of 3934

38140.1003 In reply to 38140.1000
That could be solved by only sea water doing it, by which I specifically mean water connected to a big area of sea - all springs, small lakes, and other water would not be sea water, and using a bucket on sea water would result in non-sea water. So, Jon's aqueduct stuff would still work, but without flooding caverns (except coastal caves, which would be good). Might still cause some issues with leaks, but that just makes the game a bit more exciting - you have to pay attention and fix things quickly to avoid the damage. `3.1415P265E589T932E846R64338`

0/0

Reply Quote

More

From:	JonCooper	1 Mar 2011 16:43
To:	Peter (BOUGHTONP)	1004 of 3934

38140.1004 In reply to 38140.1003
I always thought it /was/ only sea water that could do it Jon

0/0

Reply Quote

More

From:	spinning_plates	1 Mar 2011 16:47
To:	af (CAER)	1005 of 3934

38140.1005 In reply to 38140.987
Thank you also - I made it myself. That encourages me to do more.

0/0

Reply Quote

More

From:	spinning_plates	1 Mar 2011 16:48
To:	Mouse	1006 of 3934

38140.1006 In reply to 38140.990
I like this. And submarie - hell yes... how else would people get to Atlantis?

0/0

Reply Quote

More

From:	Peter (BOUGHTONP)	1 Mar 2011 16:58
To:	JonCooper	1007 of 3934

38140.1007 In reply to 38140.1004
There's two main types of water - "water source" and "flowing water". All water must start from (one or more) water source blocks. If you use a bucket on the top of the waterfall, you remove the water source then the whole waterfalls disappears. On a flat surface, flowing water goes for upto X blocks (10? 15?) from the nearest source. When on a slope, it is falling water, which has no vertical limit - it'll keep falling until it hits the floor - and then acts as a source where it lands (i.e. X block spread), but it is still flowing and can't be collected in a bucket. In a 2x2 hole, if you place a water source in one corner, it produces three flowing water blocks. If you place a second water source, diagonally adjacent/opposite, then it will convert all four blocks to water sources - you can then remove any four blocks with a bucket and they get re-populated. My thought above was for splitting "water source" into "sea water source" and "limited water source". Limited acting as a current water source does now. Sea water source removing (or increasing) the X block limit. Making sense? `3.1415P265E589T932E846R64338`

0/0

Reply Quote

More

From:	Peter (BOUGHTONP)	1 Mar 2011 17:04
To:	spinning_plates	1008 of 3934

38140.1008 In reply to 38140.1005
What do you use for the videos? `3.1415P265E589T932E846R64338`

0/0

Reply Quote

More

From:	ANT_THOMAS	1 Mar 2011 17:07
To:	ALL	1009 of 3934

38140.1009
Timing out?

0/0

Reply Quote

More