CodingRelentless posting of stuff nobody but me cares about

  

Press Ctrl+Enter to quickly submit your post
Quick Reply  
 
 
  
 From:  Peter (BOUGHTONP)   5 Oct 2007 14:36 
 To:  Ben (BENLUMLEY)      7 of 17 
33280.7 In reply to 33280.6 
Railo is a third-party CFML compiler. Same language, different app server. Closest comparison I can think is with SQL implementations:
SQL -> Oracle/MySQL/PostgreSQL/(etc)
CFML -> ColdFusion/Railo/BlueDragon/SmithProject

(Except SQL is defined ANSI, whilst CFML is defined by the big three taking features from each other.)


If you really want to know more I'll go start a new thread, so Rendle doesn't shout at me for sabotaging his .NET happiness. :)

0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  THERE IS NO GOD BUT (RENDLE)    5 Oct 2007 16:05 
 To:  Ben (BENLUMLEY)      8 of 17 
33280.8 In reply to 33280.2 
Time constraints.

There are two types of creationist: morons and liars.
0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  Ally   5 Oct 2007 16:55 
 To:  THERE IS NO GOD BUT (RENDLE)       9 of 17 
33280.9 In reply to 33280.1 
About time. Right now I'm developing .Net 1.1 applications in 2005. It's an utter pain in the arse.
0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  THERE IS NO GOD BUT (RENDLE)    5 Oct 2007 17:09 
 To:  Ally      10 of 17 
33280.10 In reply to 33280.9 
It still won't let you use .NET 1.1. And you really shouldn't, you know. There's absolutely no good reason for it.

There are two types of creationist: morons and liars.
0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  Ally   11 Oct 2007 20:05 
 To:  THERE IS NO GOD BUT (RENDLE)       11 of 17 
33280.11 In reply to 33280.10 

Well it was more the principle than expecting backwards compatibility for two versions.

 

And I'd really, really like to not develop using 1.1, it irritates me intensely. As usual though, it's out of my hands.
0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  Rowan   11 Oct 2007 22:36 
 To:  THERE IS NO GOD BUT (RENDLE)       12 of 17 
33280.12 In reply to 33280.10 
I do .NET 1.1 in VS 2003. Because our client said so.

0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  THERE IS NO GOD BUT (RENDLE)    12 Oct 2007 09:42 
 To:  Rowan      13 of 17 
33280.13 In reply to 33280.12 
Your client is stupid.

There are two types of creationist: morons and liars.
0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  Rowan   13 Oct 2007 14:02 
 To:  THERE IS NO GOD BUT (RENDLE)       14 of 17 
33280.14 In reply to 33280.13 
Our client want it to run on any PC with a XP SP1, and also wants it to be < 3MB. Which is not unreasonable, I suppose.

0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  THERE IS NO GOD BUT (RENDLE)    13 Oct 2007 22:34 
 To:  Rowan      15 of 17 
33280.15 In reply to 33280.14 
.NET 2.0 runs on Windows 98, I think. Definitely Windows 2000. The runtimes are about the same size for 1.1 and 2.0, and the compiled assemblies aren't much different either; in fact, because of stuff like generics, they're probably smaller in 2.0.

There are two types of creationist: morons and liars.
0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  Rowan   14 Oct 2007 02:50 
 To:  THERE IS NO GOD BUT (RENDLE)       16 of 17 
33280.16 In reply to 33280.15 
But generics and all that jazz aren't available in 1.1 - and 2.0 doesn't come as part of the SP1 download. Which is kind of the point.

0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  THERE IS NO GOD BUT (RENDLE)    14 Oct 2007 20:57 
 To:  Rowan      17 of 17 
33280.17 In reply to 33280.16 
Oh, right, I sort of get you. Although corporate systems sans SP2 boggles the mind.

There are two types of creationist: morons and liars.
0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

Reply to All    
 

1–17

Rate my interest:

Adjust text size : Smaller 10 Larger

Beehive Forum 1.5.2 |  FAQ |  Docs |  Support |  Donate! ©2002 - 2024 Project Beehive Forum

Forum Stats