Sanatoriumpath too deep

 

Press Ctrl+Enter to quickly submit your post
Quick Reply  
 
 
  
 From:  ANT_THOMAS  
 To:  Ken (SHIELDSIT)     
27901.13 In reply to 27901.12 
A little better but there's still loads of white space top and bottom of the actual image.
0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  Drew (X3N0PH0N)  
 To:  ANT_THOMAS     
27901.14 In reply to 27901.13 
Not here there isn't.

0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  Peter (BOUGHTONP)  
 To:  Ken (SHIELDSIT)     
27901.15 In reply to 27901.12 
Your sig is too bunched up, can you add some whitespace?
0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  Ken (SHIELDSIT)  
 To:  Peter (BOUGHTONP)     
27901.16 In reply to 27901.15 
It was on sale, fuckin white space police! Give a brother a break!
0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  Peter (BOUGHTONP)  
 To:  Ken (SHIELDSIT)     
27901.17 In reply to 27901.16 
:?
0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  Ken (SHIELDSIT)  
 To:  Peter (BOUGHTONP)     
27901.18 In reply to 27901.17 
I thought you were being mean like Ant. I don't know who to believe now. Too much white space, not enough. I'll just take the damn thing off!
0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  Peter (BOUGHTONP)  
 To:  Ken (SHIELDSIT)     
27901.19 In reply to 27901.18 
Nooo! Leave it on.

Just add a gap above his head, so it doesn't look hunched over in a cave when there's text above.

Or right align it would work too.
0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  ANT_THOMAS  
 To:  Drew (X3N0PH0N)     
27901.20 In reply to 27901.14 
There bloody well is, just because you have a massive sig :C



0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  Ken (SHIELDSIT)  
 To:  ANT_THOMAS     
27901.21 In reply to 27901.20 
wow, he's only half that tall on my screen. I'll cut him down instead of relying on doing it in the html.

0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  Drew (X3N0PH0N)  
 To:  ANT_THOMAS     
27901.22 In reply to 27901.20 
Just to check we're seeing the same thing...

0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  Peter (BOUGHTONP)  
 To:  ANT_THOMAS     
27901.23 In reply to 27901.20 

Attachments:

0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  ANT_THOMAS  
 To:  Drew (X3N0PH0N)     
27901.24 In reply to 27901.22 
We are not seeing the same thing. I was actually going to recommend looking at Matts sig to see how to do a stickman at the right size, but he's got it right already, just not for me.

Attachments:

0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  Peter (BOUGHTONP)  
 To:  ANT_THOMAS     
27901.25 In reply to 27901.20 
( I was late 'cus I got carried away working out how to bypass the "no embedding attachment" thing. )
0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  Drew (X3N0PH0N)  
 To:  ANT_THOMAS     
27901.26 In reply to 27901.24 
What the hell are you still using FF for? That's like using IE these days. Madman.

0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  ANT_THOMAS  
 To:  ALL
27901.27 
Sig code....

HTML code:
<img src="http://www.techhideaway.com/pics/stickman2.jpg" border="0" height="40%" />


Does FF not like height="40%" or something?
0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  ANT_THOMAS  
 To:  Drew (X3N0PH0N)     
27901.28 In reply to 27901.26 

Shut up. I tried Chrome ages ago and it was shit.

 

Though I did have to hunt out which addon had a memory leak recently. Managed to max out my memory, at one point FF was using about 1.2GB with not many tabs open. Fixed that though.

0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  Peter (BOUGHTONP)  
 To:  ANT_THOMAS     
27901.29 In reply to 27901.27 

Hmm. Think Firefox might be correct actually.

 

Height is supposed to only work on block level elements, and image default to being inline, so it shouldn't be changing it.

 

Also, percentage heights are calculated based on the parent container - height 40% means 4/10th of the height of the parent object - which in the case of a signature box is not specifically set - it's a question of "40% of what?".

 

Seems Chrome is taking the sig box height pre-resize, calculating 40%, then setting the height of the image based on that, and then reducing the sig box to still only wrap the image.

 

Maybe.

 

So yeah: Ken, just use pixels instead. Or resize the image file.

 

And save it as a PNG, not JPG, and it'll not have the ugly artefacts.

0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  Drew (X3N0PH0N)  
 To:  ANT_THOMAS     
27901.30 In reply to 27901.28 
Chrome was shit ages ago, aye. I hated it on first try. It's awesome now though.

Install it, install adthwart and there's no looking back. It's just better.

0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  ANT_THOMAS  
 To:  Drew (X3N0PH0N)     
27901.31 In reply to 27901.30 
Is there a flashblock thingy?
0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  ANT_THOMAS  
 To:  Drew (X3N0PH0N)     
27901.32 In reply to 27901.30 

Oh, and an exif viewer? and all the other stuff I use?

 

Also, does flash work better? It's been crashing fuckloads lately.

0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

Reply to All  
 

1–20  21–40  41–58

Rate my interest:

Adjust text size : Smaller 10 Larger

Beehive Forum 1.5.2 |  FAQ |  Docs |  Support |  Donate! ©2002 - 2024 Project Beehive Forum

Forum Stats