Thanks for the kind comments, Dazza. Yes, I've come to terms with submitting TCB to the Jersey Heritage Trust as it is (indeed, I have now done so). But it still grates with me.

It's a phenomenon which I'm sure most of the posters on Teh will recognise. Whatever your sphere of creative endeavour, be it whittling, or interweb-knitting, or guitar thrashing, you can never look at your own creations without seeing its imperfections and mistakes. It gets better over time: on occasion I've caught up with one of my carvings years after I completed it, and I can actually derive some pleasure from looking at it; but when I look at a new piece, all I can see is a bunch of mistakes held together with wood.

Oh, but who hasn't been...

I think all this talk about wood and balls is affecting you.

If we still had shillings and pence, then people would be better adders. And dividers. And multipliers. And taker awayers.

Everything divides by 10 these days, it doesn't make for an active mathematical mind. IMO.

Been dead for a week.
Now this post can finally die.

ohhhh...

nice grades

The grade boundries are Generally

A* 90%
A 80%
B 70%
C 60%
D 50%
E 40%
F 30%
G 20%

But at his level (GCSE) I'm guessing he took all the Higher tier exams which means the Lowest actual grade you can get is usually a C and after that it is a Fail.

I see. We usually have D = around 65%. Anything lower than that is considered a fail. On the college level they sometimes distinguish a fail because of incomplete course work differently.

I had a professor that went to Princeton when they only gave pass or fail for grades. When he tried to do graduate work, the school he was applying for wanted actual grade letters. Not knowing what to do, he told his advisor this and he said, "well, what do you want?" He said, "A's would be nice." And that's how the transcript went out.

It was a conversation about how grades are over rated because every teacher will grade differently for the same work.