Internet Explorer - him gone

From: JonCooper18 Mar 2015 19:02
To: ALL1 of 19
http://www.itv.com/news/2015-03-18/internet-explorer-to-be-replaced-after-20-years/

it was the people's browser that people don't use much anymore
From: 99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD)18 Mar 2015 19:12
To: JonCooper 2 of 19
I use it on my Win7 machine.
From: CHYRON (DSMITHHFX)18 Mar 2015 19:26
To: JonCooper 3 of 19
Still in heavy use by corporations AFAICT.
From: JonCooper18 Mar 2015 19:33
To: CHYRON (DSMITHHFX) 4 of 19
well yes, but so is XP
From: CHYRON (DSMITHHFX)18 Mar 2015 20:02
To: JonCooper 5 of 19
I just hope they stop using Word to render HTML in Outlook. Ugh.
From: graphitone18 Mar 2015 22:38
To: CHYRON (DSMITHHFX) 6 of 19
(nod)

You ever looked at the code that it spews out? It's horrible.
From: cynicoid19 Mar 2015 20:49
To: ALL7 of 19
What I hate about IE is there are dozens of security/configuration options, 90% of which I have no idea what they mean or do.

Open up firefox and what are there, 20 ? Just about all are understandable and simple.
From: 99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD)19 Mar 2015 22:50
To: cynicoid 8 of 19
The biggest problems with IE are ActiveX and the intimate connection between the browser and the OS.

I read somewhere, long ago, that the difference between Java(?, may have been something else) and ActiveX is that while both of them open the door of your computer to strangers, Java/whatever follows them around the house making sure they don't get up to no good, while ActiveX just stands at the door waiting for them to leave.

Having said that Java hasn't been faring too well recently in terms of security.
From: koswix20 Mar 2015 01:24
To: 99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD) 9 of 19
Yeah but at least it's free, unlike safari.
EDITED: 20 Mar 2015 01:25 by KOSWIX
From: Dave!!21 Mar 2015 14:44
To: 99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD) 10 of 19
If I had to say one positive thing about ActiveX over Java, it is that at least you don't end up with all the compatibility issues with ActiveX.

At our place we have some applets that require a version of Java 6, they'll work with Java 7 but only if the security settings are changed. Then a different site comes along and requires Java 7 or early Java 8, then Java says "I need updating" and people do that and it breaks both sites as the later Java 8s require signed apps. And if they uninstall it then it goes back to Java 6 which breaks the second site.

I detest Java :(
From: Lucy (X3N0PH0N)21 Mar 2015 15:00
To: Dave!! 11 of 19
>you don't end up with all the compatibility issues with ActiveX

Well it only works in IE and on Windows so...

At least Java fails to work on every platform in the universe.
From: Peter (BOUGHTONP)21 Mar 2015 19:09
To: Dave!! 12 of 19
> we have some applets

There's your problem.

EDITED: 21 Mar 2015 19:10 by BOUGHTONP
Message 41440.13 was deleted
From: Peter (BOUGHTONP)21 Mar 2015 22:43
To: Al JunioR (53NORTH) 14 of 19
I'm out of nothing, though I could do with some more.
From: 99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD)21 Mar 2015 23:01
To: Dave!! 15 of 19
Don't in any way get the idea that I like Java. I don't. And, as I think I've mentioned here before, I have to use an International regulatory database using Java that suffers from exactly the version incompatibilities that you mention.

Java is a right royal PITA.

But, also what Xen sed.
From: Manthorp22 Mar 2015 18:31
To: JonCooper 16 of 19
It was the people's bag of shite.
From: 99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD)22 Mar 2015 21:49
To: Manthorp 17 of 19
I thought that was Diana, Princess of Hearts Wales.
From: Manthorp22 Mar 2015 23:03
To: 99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD) 18 of 19
She was the people's slaaaaaaag...
From: 99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD)22 Mar 2015 23:35
To: Manthorp 19 of 19
Of course, silly me.