1–1011–12

clamav

From: 99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD)22 Dec 2014 08:56
To: CHYRON (DSMITHHFX) 7 of 12
41317.7 In reply to 41317.6
Oh, I dunno, the usual I guess. Scanned for viruses, updated itself to current virus definitions. Should I expect anything else?
Reply
0/0
From: CHYRON (DSMITHHFX)22 Dec 2014 11:41
To: 99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD) 8 of 12
41317.8 In reply to 41317.7
Found any viruses?
Reply
0/0
From: Peter (BOUGHTONP)22 Dec 2014 13:05
To: CHYRON (DSMITHHFX) 9 of 12
41317.9 In reply to 41317.1
Put working AV products on the Windows boxes and don't waste the resources, time and effort on ClamAV.
Reply
0/0
From: 99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD)22 Dec 2014 13:12
To: CHYRON (DSMITHHFX) 10 of 12
41317.10 In reply to 41317.8
No. Which means either it's not working or my QNAP has none. Does that help?
Reply
0/0
From: CHYRON (DSMITHHFX)22 Dec 2014 13:44
To: Peter (BOUGHTONP) 11 of 12
41317.11 In reply to 41317.9
Yeah I think so. From what I've read, cav has more value on a mail server.
Reply
0/0
From: Peter (BOUGHTONP)22 Dec 2014 14:24
To: CHYRON (DSMITHHFX) 12 of 12
41317.12 In reply to 41317.11
From what I've read, it has almost zero value.

I mean, it might protect you from as much as 50-60% of viruses, but simply not downloading from dodgy sites and not opening unsolicited attachments has a higher protection rate than that.

Reply
0/0