1–1011–2021–3031–4041–50…61–67

Saturday 20th December

From: graphitone18 Dec 2014 10:30
To: 99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD) 33 of 67
41295.33 In reply to 41295.31
Oh, to be a fly on the wall in that conversation.

I wonder who was mad enough to keep the mold that Peter emanated from and promulgated that madness by putting forth a duplicate?

 
Reply
0/0
From: 99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD)18 Dec 2014 10:43
To: graphitone 34 of 67
41295.34 In reply to 41295.33
It's 'mould'. :|
Reply
0/0
From: graphitone18 Dec 2014 12:16
To: 99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD) 35 of 67
41295.35 In reply to 41295.34
Sweaty knickers, I knew I'd get that wrong.

Mold is more Americanised, but the 'U' in our version seems to hark back to some old French influence. So I can't win.

However:
 
Quote: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_and_British_English_spelling_differences
Both spellings have been used since the 16th century. In Canada, both spellings are used. In New Zealand, "mold" refers to a form for casting a shape while "mould" refers to the fungus
Reply
0/0
From: 99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD)18 Dec 2014 13:10
To: graphitone 36 of 67
41295.36 In reply to 41295.35
American is more wrong than French. That's the way it is.
Reply
0/0
From: graphitone18 Dec 2014 13:19
To: 99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD) 37 of 67
41295.37 In reply to 41295.36
And English has to be more right than French. (nod)

As long as we have teh betterers over the Americans, that's ok.
Reply
0/0
From: 99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD)18 Dec 2014 14:02
To: graphitone 38 of 67
41295.38 In reply to 41295.37
(nod)
Reply
0/0
From: Ken (SHIELDSIT)18 Dec 2014 15:02
To: 99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD) 39 of 67
41295.39 In reply to 41295.36
I don't know how one person can be so wrong all the time!
Reply
0/0
From: milko19 Dec 2014 14:49
To: Peter (BOUGHTONP) 40 of 67
41295.40 In reply to 41295.24
I am looking decreasingly likely to make it to central London at all tomorrow :(
Reply
0/0
From: Voltane19 Dec 2014 15:52
To: milko 41 of 67
41295.41 In reply to 41295.40
Ok, i completely misread that.

Uhm..does this mean I'll be sitting on my own again?
EDITED: 19 Dec 2014 15:54 by VOLTANE
Reply
0/0
From: milko19 Dec 2014 15:58
To: Voltane 42 of 67
41295.42 In reply to 41295.41
Where's Peter at? 

There's still a remote chance things change for me and I can pop by in the afternoon. But I would be surprised.
Reply
0/0
From: Peter (BOUGHTONP)19 Dec 2014 22:47
To: Voltane 43 of 67
41295.43 In reply to 41295.41
Get us a table with candles. :)
Reply
0/0
From: Peter (BOUGHTONP)19 Dec 2014 22:53
To: milko 44 of 67
41295.44 In reply to 41295.42
I'll aim to arrive for 14:00, unless everyone drops out in which case I'll probably just go somewhere to take photos for a few hours instead.
Reply
0/0
From: Peter (BOUGHTONP)20 Dec 2014 01:30
To: Voltane 45 of 67
41295.45 In reply to 41295.43
p.s. I'll confirm I'm coming by around midday tomorrow.

If I don't post by then I've either overslept or have a crappy headache or something - hopefully wont happen, but just in case...

Reply
0/0
From: Voltane20 Dec 2014 12:20
To: Peter (BOUGHTONP) 46 of 67
41295.46 In reply to 41295.45
On my way into London. Got some Christmas shopping to do anyway.

Hopefully see you at 2!
Reply
0/0
From: Peter (BOUGHTONP)20 Dec 2014 13:02
To: Voltane 47 of 67
41295.47 In reply to 41295.46
Yep, got a bit of a headache but it'll go soon.

See you in a couple of hours.

Reply
0/0
From: Voltane20 Dec 2014 14:56
To: Peter (BOUGHTONP) 48 of 67
41295.48 In reply to 41295.47
There doesn't appear to be any candles.

We'll just have to make do.
Reply
0/0
From: koswix20 Dec 2014 16:56
To: ALL49 of 67
41295.49
Pics or it didn't happen.
Reply
0/0
From: Voltane20 Dec 2014 17:48
To: koswix 50 of 67
41295.50 In reply to 41295.49
Nachos down!
EDITED: 20 Dec 2014 17:52 by VOLTANE
Reply
0/0
From: Voltane20 Dec 2014 17:53
To: Voltane 51 of 67
41295.51 In reply to 41295.50
Hmm, well hopefully that attached. Can't tell from here. :/
Reply
0/0
From: koswix20 Dec 2014 18:13
To: Voltane 52 of 67
41295.52 In reply to 41295.51
A likely story.
Reply
0/0