liteweight text editor: x2

From: CHYRON (DSMITHHFX)19 Jan 2014 14:21
To: ALL6 of 12
..
Attachments:
From: ANT_THOMAS19 Jan 2014 14:30
To: ALL7 of 12
Do people not like nano?
From: CHYRON (DSMITHHFX)19 Jan 2014 14:31
To: ANT_THOMAS 8 of 12
Nein. No.
From: af (CAER)20 Jan 2014 13:26
To: CHYRON (DSMITHHFX) 9 of 12
Well I guess the point was what's the advantage of 'extremely lightweight', but VM with < 1GB tbh is probably a use case. Though still, running a GUI on a VM? Remote or local?

I'm a Vim man myself, anyway.
From: sinkywinky20 Jan 2014 15:08
To: ANT_THOMAS 10 of 12
Far too easy to use.  Vim 4 iife

:wq
From: af (CAER)20 Jan 2014 17:08
To: sinkywinky 11 of 12
iVim isn't that hard once you get used to its weirdness<esc>bcwunique modal ways<esc>:w
From: CHYRON (DSMITHHFX)20 Jan 2014 17:13
To: af (CAER) 12 of 12
local. far easier to read and edit config files than (ugh) vim over ssh. This is on a local development server instance. I wouldn't run a gui on a remote, though I would use nano rather than vim or, if doing extensive edits, edit locally and scp up.