liteweight text editor: x2

From: CHYRON (DSMITHHFX)14 Jan 2014 15:44
To: ALL1 of 12
New to me: http://gtk-apps.org/content/show.php?content=145463

- 110k lite

- syntax highlighting (not sure how many languages supported, but deffo does html)

- tabs

- didn't need any dependencies on ubuntu server + xfce (I may have already installed other stuff though)

- I dislike mousepad, for various reasons but mainly it only does one open document at a time.

- I do like gedit, but too many dependencies !== liteweight

- ditto geany (which I install anyway)

- bonus: it's not java!
EDITED: 14 Jan 2014 15:45 by DSMITHHFX
From: Lucy (X3N0PH0N)14 Jan 2014 18:51
To: CHYRON (DSMITHHFX) 2 of 12
I dislike mousepad too and generally use Geany. But I'll check this out, thanks!
From: Ken (SHIELDSIT)15 Jan 2014 07:19
To: Lucy (X3N0PH0N) 3 of 12
Poor mousepad!  I suspect the feds have put you two up to this!
From: af (CAER)18 Jan 2014 22:30
To: CHYRON (DSMITHHFX) 4 of 12
Why would you use this instead of Gedit?
From: CHYRON (DSMITHHFX)19 Jan 2014 13:36
To: af (CAER) 5 of 12
http://www.tehforum.co.uk/forum/index.php?webtag=DEFAULT&msg=40879.1

Glad you axed though, I took another look at the web site and noticed the application does not seem to be in active development since a year. I pulled it into latest ubuntu from a repo, so I assumed it was more recent. I still think it's a neat and extremely lightweight editor. Gedit now relies on gtk3.x, so that would be a lot of dependencies & resources to pull down for a server install + xfc desktop running in a VM with <1g ram.
EDITED: 19 Jan 2014 14:20 by DSMITHHFX
From: CHYRON (DSMITHHFX)19 Jan 2014 14:21
To: ALL6 of 12
..
Attachments:
From: ANT_THOMAS19 Jan 2014 14:30
To: ALL7 of 12
Do people not like nano?
From: CHYRON (DSMITHHFX)19 Jan 2014 14:31
To: ANT_THOMAS 8 of 12
Nein. No.
From: af (CAER)20 Jan 2014 13:26
To: CHYRON (DSMITHHFX) 9 of 12
Well I guess the point was what's the advantage of 'extremely lightweight', but VM with < 1GB tbh is probably a use case. Though still, running a GUI on a VM? Remote or local?

I'm a Vim man myself, anyway.
From: sinkywinky20 Jan 2014 15:08
To: ANT_THOMAS 10 of 12
Far too easy to use.  Vim 4 iife

:wq
From: af (CAER)20 Jan 2014 17:08
To: sinkywinky 11 of 12
iVim isn't that hard once you get used to its weirdness<esc>bcwunique modal ways<esc>:w
From: CHYRON (DSMITHHFX)20 Jan 2014 17:13
To: af (CAER) 12 of 12
local. far easier to read and edit config files than (ugh) vim over ssh. This is on a local development server instance. I wouldn't run a gui on a remote, though I would use nano rather than vim or, if doing extensive edits, edit locally and scp up.