'Like' button

From: koswix18 Apr 2013 21:01
To: Manthorp 5 of 40
This chap has a massive cock. Quite impressive. A lesser man might be intimidated, but I respect him for it.
From: Manthorp18 Apr 2013 21:03
To: ANT_THOMAS 6 of 40
Teh has always seemed busy enough to me; just at a more discursive pace than social media.  That's an essential of its charm and its value.

But it does add another option for courtesy to be able to express that you value or agree with a post, without adding a new post.  But it's no biggie.
From: Manthorp18 Apr 2013 21:04
To: koswix 7 of 40
<disappointed>
From: ANT_THOMAS18 Apr 2013 21:05
To: Manthorp 8 of 40
For what it's worth, I agree.
From: Manthorp18 Apr 2013 21:07
To: ANT_THOMAS 9 of 40
It's worth £58.60
From: Manthorp18 Apr 2013 21:07
To: Manthorp 10 of 40
= 5 brick
From: Manthorp18 Apr 2013 21:07
To: Manthorp 11 of 40
at current rates of exchange
From: ANT_THOMAS18 Apr 2013 21:09
To: Manthorp 12 of 40
Not as much as it used to be :(
From: JonCooper18 Apr 2013 21:14
To: Manthorp 13 of 40
I'd like a "don't like" button - though more for FB than here
From: koswix18 Apr 2013 21:15
To: Manthorp 14 of 40
The trouble with 'Like' is that it doesn't add anything to the discussion, really. When someone goes to the bother of actually posting "I agree" or ":D" or whatever, it may not add anything directly but it does then give an opportunity for the discussion to begin, or views to be challenged. Not sure that a Like button promotes discussion in the same way.


quote:
But it's no biggie.

Don't be so hard on yourself, it was big enough to stop Greg sitting down for a week.

From: Manthorp18 Apr 2013 21:29
To: koswix 15 of 40
<like>
From: Lucy (X3N0PH0N)18 Apr 2013 22:34
To: Manthorp 16 of 40
I think this makes sense if there's a semi-nested structure to the discussion and the 'like'ing promotes popular posts to a more prominent position (like slashdot's system, which is really pretty similar to the facebook system though the organisation is different) but I don't see what sense it makes when applied to an essentially flat structure as we have here. I'd rather see a reply with :D or (nod) or "I agree.".

But yeah, wouldn't do any harm either other than possibly reducing the number of posts, as Ant says.

But yeah, if there's 'like' I'd really want 'dislike' too.
From: Lucy (X3N0PH0N)18 Apr 2013 22:35
To: Lucy (X3N0PH0N) 17 of 40
Emoticons broken or just me?
From: ANT_THOMAS18 Apr 2013 22:38
To: Lucy (X3N0PH0N) 18 of 40
Just you, I can see them!
From: Manthorp18 Apr 2013 22:45
To: Lucy (X3N0PH0N) 19 of 40
Perhaps if Matt was minded, he could pilot it & see whether & how it affected our intercourse.
From: Oscarvarium (OZGUR)18 Apr 2013 22:45
To: Lucy (X3N0PH0N) 20 of 40
I actually really dislike that about Reddit's format, to the extent that for the subreddit(s) I care about I always view them by recent posts first.
From: Manthorp18 Apr 2013 22:52
To: Oscarvarium (OZGUR) 21 of 40
I'm sure there's a middle way.  Leave the order as it is, but indicate with a scaled icon the posts that are highly regarded.
From: ANT_THOMAS18 Apr 2013 23:01
To: Manthorp 22 of 40
Or just simply a number of likes and a mouse over with the users who liked? Exactly like Facebook I guess.

Or a scale to rate a post? Rather than like/up dislike/down. I don't think promoting posts would work at all with beehive.
From: Manthorp18 Apr 2013 23:09
To: ANT_THOMAS 23 of 40
Or, as Kos said and I quote, "a dragon with a cock proportionate to the popularity of the post."
From: koswix18 Apr 2013 23:12
To: Manthorp 24 of 40
Perhaps have a user setting for the likes of Ken who are squeamish about dragon cocks, for them the font size of the post in question could be increased or decreased by 1 for each like/dislike the post receives.