These...
quote:
One of the big reasons we used them at my previous job was because they were used in a very dirty environment. The lack of moving parts and hard drives let them last a lot longer than a normal computer would have.
You can also lock them down nicely. And when they would get a virus all you had to do was reboot and it would be back to a new state.
are reasonable reasons.
And...
quote:
It's definitely more elegant for a company with a lot of people doing undemanding stuff (office, email, web). Rather than upgrading several thousand PCs every few years you upgrade a few servers. Also makes sense for a company which has server CPU cycles going spare (since many server applications in business are disk heavy but CPU light).
I totally get this and being energy efficient whilst cutting costs is a great idea. But are thin clients actually a good user experience?
I guess my only experience was a very limited one that was very bad. The cheap low-spec PCs I've used in various libraries/IT centres were still a million times better than the thin-clients I used.