1–1011–16

The Lights Are On!

From: ANT_THOMAS14 Aug 2012 16:46
To: Peter (BOUGHTONP) 14 of 16
39806.14 In reply to 39806.13
Would that really be a sackable offence? As opposed to just a warning?

So long as he's not actively avoiding work (i.e. only using it during breaks/downtime), which I presume is the case anyway, it's not really doing any harm?


Ahahahahahahaha
Reply
0/0
From: patch14 Aug 2012 17:40
To: Peter (BOUGHTONP) 15 of 16
39806.15 In reply to 39806.13
There'd be wording along the lines of " actively circumventing the prescribed security procedures" involved.
Reply
0/0
From: 99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD)14 Aug 2012 18:31
To: Peter (BOUGHTONP) 16 of 16
39806.16 In reply to 39806.12
Exactly. Like patch says, actively circumventing security.
Reply
0/0