Alan's Psychadelic Earthquake Breakfast

From: Drew (X3N0PH0N)24 Sep 2012 16:21
To: graphitone 371 of 392
I have several responses to this:

1. It's not like people who claim to be fervently religious (especially where the religion prohibits idolatry) destroying the iconography of another religion/sect is novel. It's been going on since at least ancient Egypt, and we did our share of it too.

2. Buddhism values an acceptance of transience and lack of attachment.

3. Dropping bombs on their houses is worse.

But yes, I'm not being contentious or owt. The Taliban are vile.
From: Manthorp24 Sep 2012 16:30
To: Drew (X3N0PH0N) 372 of 392
Worth saying that tourist traffic visiting the Buddhas was a major source of income to the whole valley. That's arguably the greatest crime of the Taliban; depriving local people of their living.
From: Drew (X3N0PH0N)24 Sep 2012 16:34
To: Manthorp 373 of 392

Aye, though I'm sure that's in their interests too.

 

(edit: the Taliban's I mean)

EDITED: 24 Sep 2012 16:34 by X3N0PH0N
From: 99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD)24 Sep 2012 17:07
To: Manthorp 374 of 392
But who needs to make a living when you have religious fundamentalism to put food on the table? Oh...
From: graphitone24 Sep 2012 17:20
To: Drew (X3N0PH0N) 375 of 392
I agree. (nod)

However, what we need to do is get a 3d render of the statues pre destruction, then using the current crop of 3d printers, we should be able to replicate them. Admittedly, it might only be along the scale of a nice garden ornament at first, but let the technology mature and soon we'll be printing 200ft sky scraping Buddhas like they were going out of fashion.
From: patch24 Sep 2012 17:31
To: Manthorp 376 of 392
My parents took this photo sometime in the late 60s. Maybe early 70s. And this one.

I've got nothing really to add to this conversation. I just felt like sharing the pictures.
EDITED: 24 Sep 2012 17:32 by PATCH
From: Manthorp24 Sep 2012 17:39
To: ALL377 of 392
Thanks Patch, they're lovely. And sad.

Graphitone: D-Shape are already 3d printing small buildings. It's only a matter of time...

Mr. B Indeed. Let them eat Manna. or more likely, unleavened bread and bitter herbs.
From: JonCooper24 Sep 2012 22:11
To: Manthorp 378 of 392
cant get the embed to work :( http://www.youtube.com/embed/SYkbqzWVHZI
EDITED: 24 Sep 2012 22:14 by JONCOOPER
From: Manthorp24 Sep 2012 22:43
To: JonCooper 379 of 392
Stone me!
From: Manthorp27 Sep 2012 06:22
To: Al JunioR (53NORTH) 380 of 392
Extraordinary, Snort, that with your superhuman insight you seem to have missed the creation of a new tectonic plate boundary. Perhaps you were watching Iceland too closely?
From: 99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD)27 Sep 2012 11:29
To: Manthorp 381 of 392

That was back in April. Iceland is NOW!

 

Snort.

Message 39777.382 was deleted
From: Drew (X3N0PH0N)28 Sep 2012 21:59
To: Al JunioR (53NORTH) 383 of 392
Sounds legit.
From: koswix28 Sep 2012 22:03
To: Al JunioR (53NORTH) 384 of 392
I have some lovey anake oil for sale that would stop that happening. yours for only £9.95!
From: Manthorp29 Sep 2012 08:33
To: Drew (X3N0PH0N) 385 of 392
He has convinced me with his well-reasoned arguments.
From: JonCooper29 Sep 2012 09:19
To: Al JunioR (53NORTH) 386 of 392
if the poles flipped (which they may well do, they have before) why would that cause the sea to get out of it's bed and go mountaineering?
Message 39777.387 was deleted
From: Manthorp30 Sep 2012 08:44
To: Al JunioR (53NORTH) 388 of 392
a) why would it 'hug' more than it already does, just because it has reversed and b) if they did attract each other, the world would not contact, but become more oblate: it's a balloon full of fluid.
Message 39777.389 was deleted
Message 39777.390 was deleted