1–1011–17

And take /that/ HTC!

From: Mouse20 Dec 2011 10:57
To: 99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD) 5 of 17
39191.5 In reply to 39191.1
It was only one patent of ten that was upheld, which HTC are saying is easily fixable, so I doubt it's the Apple camp celebrating, it's good for HTC if anything.
Reply
0/0
From: Mouse20 Dec 2011 11:13
To: 99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD) 6 of 17
39191.6 In reply to 39191.1
quote: FT
HTC calls ITC ruling a ‘victory’ over Apple


It's all silliness though.
Reply
0/0
From: koswix20 Dec 2011 11:30
To: Mouse 7 of 17
39191.7 In reply to 39191.5
The patent seems to be "clicking on numbers and treating them as phone numbers", which every phone I've had since a Nokia 3330 has been able to do :|
Reply
0/0
From: Mouse20 Dec 2011 11:36
To: koswix 8 of 17
39191.8 In reply to 39191.7

(fail)

 

Don't you get that in Gmail too?

Reply
0/0
From: Ken (SHIELDSIT)20 Dec 2011 14:34
To: ALL9 of 17
39191.9 In reply to 39191.8
I think it will fall into 'prior art'.
Reply
0/0
From: koswix20 Dec 2011 16:30
To: Ken (SHIELDSIT) 10 of 17
39191.10 In reply to 39191.9
But clearly it hasn't, as Apple won that one.
Reply
0/0
From: af (CAER)20 Dec 2011 16:33
To: Drew (X3N0PH0N) 11 of 17
39191.11 In reply to 39191.2

Patentgeddon (cheer)

 

Patentocalypse (dance)

 

Patentrök :?

EDITED: 20 Dec 2011 16:33 by CAER
Reply
0/0
From: 99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD)20 Dec 2011 19:23
To: Drew (X3N0PH0N) 12 of 17
39191.12 In reply to 39191.4
How else do you think they feed at the bottom?
Reply
0/0
From: Drew (X3N0PH0N)20 Dec 2011 19:29
To: 99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD) 13 of 17
39191.13 In reply to 39191.12
:'D
Reply
0/0
From: Serg (NUKKLEAR)22 Dec 2011 10:11
To: Drew (X3N0PH0N) 14 of 17
39191.14 In reply to 39191.2

*patents complete / utter / partial / indiscriminate destruction*

 

Now you can't have a war, m'f'ers :Y

Reply
0/0
From: Drew (X3N0PH0N)22 Dec 2011 10:15
To: Serg (NUKKLEAR) 15 of 17
39191.15 In reply to 39191.14
[prior art]
Reply
0/0
From: Serg (NUKKLEAR)22 Dec 2011 10:20
To: Drew (X3N0PH0N) 16 of 17
39191.16 In reply to 39191.15
I meant in a patent-related war.
Reply
0/0
From: Drew (X3N0PH0N)22 Dec 2011 10:28
To: Serg (NUKKLEAR) 17 of 17
39191.17 In reply to 39191.16
Ass :C
Reply
0/0