http://twitter.com/#!/wikileaks/status/13227924597514240

 

odd!

Bear in mind that the 'Insurance' file documents may not be taken primarily or at all from the cable leaks. They've had stuff from scores of different sources which might include highly classified forms of communication.

And you have a point about the 'news magnet'. There is inevitably a trade-off between personality & publicity. Hopefully, if Assange is taken out of the equation, Wikileaks can ride on its notoriety for a good while, without fuelling it by any means other than supplying important content.

Of course, the other option is for unhappy ex-wikileakers to break away and start OpenLeaks.

The cynic in me wonders if the new group is trustable, but then again, the more independant organisations of this type, the better... maybe?

Trustworthy, perhaps?

That's also a word one could use.

It is indeed Sagepay. To be fair, only one order failed and my beautiful bespoke checkout system can capture Sagepay errors and alert me (and the customer via email).

Today has been fine, which is surprising as most of my orders are via Visa.

And I am sad that there is a war against me. I didn't even get to blow anything up :'S

I'm guessing most stuff is Visa Debit these days since I think a lot of banks have gone to Visa from Maestro.

You could blow up a balloon.

Your 'also' implies that trustable was used correctly.

 

If something is trustable it is capable of being placed in trust - like when an historic building is gifted to the National Trust for safekeeping.

 

You actually asked if the new/other organisations were capable of being put in trust [in a rather awkward and Americanised/Business Speak way], rather than what I suspect you thought you were saying, that you wondered if it was wise to place ones trust in them.

I can't blow up balloons :(

Unless previous filled with nitrous oxide :$

Poor effort, The "FAIL" isn't even in the middle.

;-)