Windows 7 (fail)

From: THERE IS NO GOD BUT (RENDLE) 4 Jan 2009 20:26
To: ALL26 of 55

And now I'm posting this from the 6.1.7000 build that's doing the rounds, which is probably the proper beta. Initially installed as an upgrade over Vista, which didn't go so well: the performance was appalling and Outlook wouldn't connect to the remote Exchange server. Format and fresh install and it's all looking a lot better.

 

The new taskbar is ace, big improvement over the Windows 95 one. Performance seems good but obviously it's a clean install so that's an ongoing thing. Other than that there's a lot of tweaks and refinements to the Vista UX, which are very welcome.

 

Office 2007 and Visual Studio Team System 2008 both seem to work fine.

 

It's installed on my work laptop (I also have a desktop which is still on XP SP3 for legacy support reasons) so I'm using it for real unless something goes horribly, horribly wrong. Woo.

From: ANT_THOMAS 4 Jan 2009 20:30
To: THERE IS NO GOD BUT (RENDLE) 27 of 55

Read a few bits where it is actually faster than XP and Vista in supposed "Real World" tasks which is nice to know.

 

I'm very tempted to give it a go. I've always gone straight into using Beta versions of Windows full time. Probably quite a stupid thing to do but ah well!

 

Could do with a fresh install in this laptop anyway.

From: Dave!! 4 Jan 2009 21:08
To: THERE IS NO GOD BUT (RENDLE) 28 of 55
I'll have to give that a try on my spare PC here. Sounds good though!
From: Wattsy (SLAYERPUNX) 4 Jan 2009 21:13
To: THERE IS NO GOD BUT (RENDLE) 29 of 55

I have just installed that on Sun xVM virtualbox to test the new direct
3D function but alas it did not work as Windows 7 still see's the GC as a stanarad VGA card. Still it was the fasted installed of a new OS that I have ever seen. Fully installed in around 12 minutes which is pretty good. I gave it 1.5Gb of ram and it runs a rather well. I have not installed any applications yet but thats the next test.

From: ANT_THOMAS 4 Jan 2009 23:57
To: THERE IS NO GOD BUT (RENDLE) 30 of 55
Oh, does it play well with Vista drivers?
From: Dave!! 5 Jan 2009 01:02
To: ANT_THOMAS 31 of 55
Should do. The two are supposed to be almost 100% compatible with each other regarding drivers and software.
From: THERE IS NO GOD BUT (RENDLE) 5 Jan 2009 08:49
To: ANT_THOMAS 32 of 55

Yeah, it's absolutely fine. It got driver updates from Windows Update and everything.

 

There seems to be a slight blip with anti-virus, but it links you to preview releases from Kaspersky or AVG. I got the Kaspersky and it works fine.

 

Oh, and UAC has got much better; there are "don't ask again for this application" checkboxes and suchlike.

From: ANT_THOMAS 5 Jan 2009 14:18
To: THERE IS NO GOD BUT (RENDLE) 33 of 55

Good good. Once I've tidied up my laptop I'll give it a go.

 

(This usually entails dumping my desktop in a folder on my server that will never be looked at again and screenshotting my Programs list, printing it and highlighting the stuff I want to install again)

From: Antiks 6 Jan 2009 00:27
To: ALL34 of 55

I might just replace XP with 7 when it's matured a bit. That's all contingent on whether I have a new PC or not.

 

2.4 ghz Intel
Intel mobo
Nvidia 7600 GS agp
1 gig RAM tbh

 

36/m/Scotland

From: THERE IS NO GOD BUT (RENDLE) 6 Jan 2009 10:33
To: Antiks 35 of 55
quote: Antiks
36/m/Scotland


No no no no no. (fail)
From: Dave!! 6 Jan 2009 11:00
To: THERE IS NO GOD BUT (RENDLE) 36 of 55
Quite right. Scotland should always be spelt with a lower case 'S' in this situation. (fail)
From: Antiks 6 Jan 2009 22:20
To: Dave!! 37 of 55
From: Wattsy (SLAYERPUNX) 6 Jan 2009 22:38
To: Antiks 38 of 55
Pourquoi?
From: Antiks 6 Jan 2009 23:19
To: Wattsy (SLAYERPUNX) 39 of 55
Car
From: Dave!! 7 Jan 2009 00:50
To: Antiks 40 of 55
:|
From: Antiks 7 Jan 2009 03:09
To: Dave!! 41 of 55
:B
From: koswix 7 Jan 2009 10:21
To: Antiks 42 of 55
From: Antiks 7 Jan 2009 12:25
To: koswix 43 of 55
From: koswix 7 Jan 2009 12:34
To: Antiks 44 of 55
From: Antiks 8 Jan 2009 01:07
To: koswix 45 of 55
wut?.