Spyware/Adware Removal?

From: JonCooper 8 Apr 2004 17:34
To: PNCOOL 6 of 44
I see Quig has something that's dealt with it, but the attached will look at every change that's ever been made to IE, by you and by crapware - then you get to fix it.
EDITED: 3 May 2004 09:32 by JONCOOPER
From: PNCOOL 8 Apr 2004 22:42
To: JonCooper 7 of 44

Cheers. I got that off of the web site mentioned earlier, just in case I had to save the log file to put on their forum. It had a few entries that it fixed, but then they came straight back again. That proggie Mike put up here fixed it all though (at least I hope it did).

 

Does the built-in XP firewall protect you from spyway/adware attacks like this, or not?

From: Mike (QUIGABYTE) 9 Apr 2004 04:41
To: JonCooper 8 of 44
That's a damn good proggie too, I think the same guy made both actually.
From: Menace! (DENNIS) 9 Apr 2004 21:21
To: PNCOOL 9 of 44
Now that you've got rid, you can set Spybot so it won't permit owt to do it again. Works for me.
From: PNCOOL10 Apr 2004 00:42
To: Menace! (DENNIS) 10 of 44
But Spybot never found it, so Spybot can't immunise against it. I've got something called Spy Guard and another called Spyware Blaster to hopefully stop any further problems.
From: Golden Axe11 Apr 2004 12:41
To: PNCOOL 11 of 44
You have to watch out for some of these rogue spyware removal applications, that claim to remove but actually install spyware!

From: PNCOOL11 Apr 2004 13:39
To: Golden Axe 12 of 44
I will do, thanks. Although, I think all of the ones on spywareinfo.com would be safe.
From: Richy (GAJIT)12 Apr 2004 01:49
To: Golden Axe 13 of 44

And some of them do a bad job of it. A good example being Ad-aware trying to remove the sponsor that is optionally installed with Messenger Plus! 2.

 

Ad-aware doesn't actually get rid of it all, and so some shit is still left over and popups still occur. However, it removes enough to fuck-over the uninstall program, so even if you uninstall Messenger Plus! 2 (which genuinely removes the sponsor when you uninstall) the nasty stuff will still be there.

From: Golden Axe12 Apr 2004 13:29
To: Richy (GAJIT) 14 of 44

Yeah, Ad-Aware screwed up the removal of new.net scum, forcing a OS reinstall.
I find Spybot to be a lot safer in removal, but I find that I need to run run both so that nothing is missed.

 

 

From: Digby14 Apr 2004 04:51
To: PNCOOL 15 of 44

That's weird, I swear by Spybot. I've got everyone at work using it now, too. Can't believe it missed something so obvious.

 

You got the *real* Spybot, right? The one with the thumbprint icon? There's a faker commercial-y venture out there that manages to make itself come up first on Google when you search "spybot"

 

 

 

Edit: If I was ALLOWED to go to work, which I'm not...

EDITED: 14 Apr 2004 05:56 by DIGBY
From: Mike (QUIGABYTE)14 Apr 2004 05:06
To: Digby 16 of 44
The icon on my version is two windows with a spyglass, the thumbprint is used on the internal logo though. Its the genuine one though as its from a coverdisk ;)

Anyway it lists coolwwwsearch but not coolwebsearch. Perhaps they are the same...

From: PNCOOL14 Apr 2004 15:48
To: Digby 17 of 44
It found coolwebsearch and coolwwwsearch. It just didn't get rid of them properly. And yes, it is the version with the thumbprint, but like Mike's it's on the program rather than the icon itself.
From: JonCooper14 Apr 2004 16:01
To: ALL18 of 44

AARRGGHH!!!!!

 

on leaving the house last night I said to the babysitter 'fell free to use the internet'

 

today I have had to run adaware, spybot, hijack, system mechanic & delete 3 folders manually - it's taken over 30 mins to remove all the crap (including a 'helpfull' toolbar).

 

babysitter will NOT be invited to 'use the internet' next time.

From: PNCOOL15 Apr 2004 03:10
To: JonCooper 19 of 44
Welcome to my world.
From: Richy (GAJIT)15 Apr 2004 14:16
To: JonCooper 20 of 44

PC Licence.

 

I say no more.

 

(And no, the European Computer Driving Licence is NOT what I'm talking about)

EDITED: 15 Apr 2004 15:17 by GAJIT
From: JonCooper15 Apr 2004 16:20
To: Richy (GAJIT) 21 of 44

babysitter is here now - she says 'it said I have to click yes to access the site'

 

aarrgghh

 

in other news: she did something similar on her own PC and agreed to a 09 style premium rate dial up number - luckily her son binned that after just £19 of browsing.

From: milko15 Apr 2004 16:26
To: JonCooper 22 of 44
These people need to be forced to use Mozilla or something. It's for the best.
From: JonCooper15 Apr 2004 16:32
To: milko 23 of 44
some people really shouldn't be allowed to play with PCs
From: PNCOOL15 Apr 2004 23:18
To: JonCooper 24 of 44
I second that comment. Although not letting idiots use PCs would do a lot of us out of jobs.
From: JonCooper16 Apr 2004 09:54
To: PNCOOL 25 of 44

I heard today that the local PC guy in town wanted £55 to 'equip a PC with sound' so this girl could chat online - he had the PC in the shop, so had no real excuse for not knowing she only needed a microphone

 

so you're right, some are making a good living from numptys