Topaz AI stuff

From: william (WILLIAMA) 8 Mar 2021 13:47
To: Peter (BOUGHTONP) 18 of 22
You're 100% right. That's probably why there are lively active threads on "why the forum is so bad" (so long as the particular mod I mentioned allows them to continue) and so few on the software itself.



 
From: CHYRON (DSMITHHFX)11 Mar 2021 15:44
To: Peter (BOUGHTONP) 19 of 22
I suspect a lot of the activity is down to performative busywork by really bored, underemployed it hacks.
From: william (WILLIAMA)12 Mar 2021 15:48
To: CHYRON (DSMITHHFX) 20 of 22
I suspect you're right. It's not exactly a bustling hub of enthusiasm anyway. It should be, considering that Topaz products have created quite a stir in photographic and video circles in the last year, but I think the forum software is really stifling discussion. Plus, any time things kick off, the arsehole mod steps in, declares the discussion "off topic" or "not relevant" and either edits posts or cancels the thread altogether.

The video categories, in particular, are dire. It's a product that is clearly designed for high-end NVIDIA GPUs. It will run (just) on a very high-end CPU but may take multiple times longer. Yet the discussion has far too many posts along the lines of "it takes 60 hours to do 10 minutes of vid on my Matrox Mystique, what's wrong?" and "will this work on my Atom-powered notepad?"
Message 42684.21 was deleted
Message 42684.22 was deleted