Typescript

From: CHYRON (DSMITHHFX)23 Sep 2016 14:12
To: ALL1 of 12
Anyone got an opinion?
From: Peter (BOUGHTONP)23 Sep 2016 21:09
To: CHYRON (DSMITHHFX) 2 of 12
Pointless.
From: CHYRON (DSMITHHFX)24 Sep 2016 00:36
To: Peter (BOUGHTONP) 3 of 12
Yeah it does kind of seem like it. Only axing cause I'm looking at angular 2, which uses it by default. Angular 2 is stupid overkill for 99% of any projects I might get involved with anytime soon, but shiny! Anyhoo you can allegedly also use bog-standard js, so mebbe it is pointless.
From: Peter (BOUGHTONP)24 Sep 2016 13:22
To: CHYRON (DSMITHHFX) 4 of 12
Never liked Angular - it doesn't smell right.

We're going with React, though I've yet to do anything meaningful enough (and free from bad implementation choices of others) to know if I'd recommend it yet.

From: CHYRON (DSMITHHFX)24 Sep 2016 21:43
To: Peter (BOUGHTONP) 5 of 12
Read this the other day
 
From: CHYRON (DSMITHHFX)24 Sep 2016 22:15
To: Peter (BOUGHTONP) 6 of 12
I used angular 1x for several projects. It's not too hard once you get your head wrapped around it. But I realized I could do most of what I needed with jquery, and the angular build environment is too complicated for what I need (e.g., you need node, npm, and a bunch of other libraries), so I dropped it.
EDITED: 24 Sep 2016 22:19 by DSMITHHFX
From: Peter (BOUGHTONP) 8 Oct 2016 16:09
To: CHYRON (DSMITHHFX) 7 of 12
From: CHYRON (DSMITHHFX) 8 Oct 2016 18:02
To: Peter (BOUGHTONP) 8 of 12
 LMAO  :-((
From: af (CAER)14 Oct 2016 10:41
To: Peter (BOUGHTONP) 9 of 12
That's partly why we're sticking with good old Backbone/jQuery/Underscore at my job. Keepin it simple, plus the kind of stuff we make doesn't really need the real-time kind of things React is good at.
From: Peter (BOUGHTONP)15 Oct 2016 16:01
To: af (CAER) 10 of 12
I'm growing less convinced that React is good at those kind of real-time things. Not when combined with all the crap it brings.

I don't recall if I've looked at Backbone before, but I'm guessing not - I just scanned the getting started stuff and it looks like the right kind of simple. I mean, the tinytext single page 800px website design is shite, but the explanations/philosophy/etc of Backbone suggest someone that knows what they're doing. I'm definitely going to have a play with it later.

From: af (CAER)16 Oct 2016 18:41
To: Peter (BOUGHTONP) 11 of 12
It's kind of minimal, and very unopinionated, which is why we like it – it can fit in nicely with existing projects, and you can use just the parts you like (we mostly just use the Models and Views).
Message 41809.12 was deleted