1–1011–2021–3031–36

Baltimore, MD

From: 99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD) 5 May 2015 08:37
To: Al JunioR (53NORTH) 21 of 36
41465.21 In reply to 41465.19
It makes sense that the only sensible part of your post should've come from AI not YI :/
Reply
0/0
From: graphitone 5 May 2015 09:17
To: 99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD) 22 of 36
41465.22 In reply to 41465.21
YI?

Youthful intelligence?
Yak intelligence?
Yacht intelligence?
Your intelligence?

Or were you doing your bestest Geordie accent?
Reply
0/0
From: fixrman 5 May 2015 10:21
To: 99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD) 23 of 36
41465.23 In reply to 41465.20
Hello.
Reply
0/0
From: 99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD) 6 May 2015 05:46
To: graphitone 24 of 36
41465.24 In reply to 41465.22
The fourth option
Reply
0/0
From: graphitone 6 May 2015 07:13
To: 99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD) 25 of 36
41465.25 In reply to 41465.24
Aye. I only reached that conclusion after going through the other options I listed. I sometimes fear the way my brain works.
Reply
0/0
From: fixrman 6 May 2015 10:32
To: graphitone 26 of 36
41465.26 In reply to 41465.25
Rather, fear when it doesn't.  ;-)
Reply
0/0
From: graphitone 6 May 2015 11:29
To: fixrman 27 of 36
41465.27 In reply to 41465.26
If that does happen I'll be in a state of blissful ignorance, so will have no idea what's going on anyway.

Then I'll get a job as a disc jockey.
Reply
+1/1
From: 99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD) 6 May 2015 12:20
To: graphitone 28 of 36
41465.28 In reply to 41465.25
I assumed that the juxtaposition with AI made it obvious :/
Reply
0/0
From: graphitone 6 May 2015 12:26
To: 99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD) 29 of 36
41465.29 In reply to 41465.28
I was trying to think what the opposite of artificial was. A natural occurring yak was the closest I got to something non-artificial beginning with Y.
Reply
0/0
From: fixrman 6 May 2015 13:19
To: graphitone 30 of 36
41465.30 In reply to 41465.27
Good plan.
Reply
0/0
From: CHYRON (DSMITHHFX) 6 May 2015 14:00
To: graphitone 31 of 36
41465.31 In reply to 41465.27
That job's being taken by a computer.
Reply
0/0
From: graphitone 6 May 2015 15:25
To: CHYRON (DSMITHHFX) 32 of 36
41465.32 In reply to 41465.31
Are you saying Terry Wogan is nothing nut a binary algorithm?
Reply
0/0
From: CHYRON (DSMITHHFX) 6 May 2015 16:18
To: graphitone 33 of 36
41465.33 In reply to 41465.32
A hostage of meatspace, evidently.
Reply
0/0
From: graphitone 6 May 2015 17:42
To: CHYRON (DSMITHHFX) 34 of 36
41465.34 In reply to 41465.33
:|
Reply
0/0
From: CHYRON (DSMITHHFX) 6 May 2015 18:19
To: graphitone 35 of 36
41465.35 In reply to 41465.34
He will soon be released to fulfill his destiny as an energy source for our digital overlords.
Reply
0/0
From: graphitone 6 May 2015 19:59
To: CHYRON (DSMITHHFX) 36 of 36
41465.36 In reply to 41465.35
I imagine all that will be left will be his steaming hairpiece.
Reply
0/0