Those sexy rodents
From: fixrman21 Apr 2015 23:02
To: Al JunioR (53NORTH)
61 of 89
I call bullshite! You are learning those languages to send Emails Advising Wise and Confident Persons of Means on the Recept of Local Funds, in the Amount of 10 (ten) Million U.S. that you will Pay a Commission of 10% of the Full Balance if they will just allow the Funds to be deposited in their account for a few days, just until the Funds clear.
0/0
From: fixrman22 Apr 2015 01:19
To: 99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD)
62 of 89
Funny, there was no issue with poking fun of katsung; another downtrodden soul, poorly understood and discriminated against.
0/0
From: 99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD)22 Apr 2015 07:04
To: fixrman
63 of 89
What you have to realise is that there are a few politically-correct, hand-wringing, bleedin' hearts here who're ashamed of the fact that they aren't negroid lesbians.
But these are the outer limits of the interwebz, and we can say what we like from the safety and anonymity of our PCs.
Can't we, cunt?
But these are the outer limits of the interwebz, and we can say what we like from the safety and anonymity of our PCs.
Can't we, cunt?
0/0
From: fixrman22 Apr 2015 11:02
To: 99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD)
64 of 89
Quote:
But these are the outer limits of the interwebz, and we can say what we like from the safety and anonymity of our PCs.
Quite true.
Quote:
Can't we, cunt?
Absolutely, ballbag - but where does the championing begin, and where does it end? By the way, the above sentence is incomplete and should have been added to the earlier statement utilising a semicolon at least. I'd think you'd use semicolons much more frequently than I do, albeit for a different reason.
Cheers!
0/0
From: 99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD)22 Apr 2015 11:47
To: fixrman
65 of 89
You're probably right about the sentence structure. I shall hang my head in shame. But not enough shame that I would regret not being a black lesbian.
EDITED: 22 Apr 2015 11:48 by MR_BASTARD
0/0
From: CHYRON (DSMITHHFX)22 Apr 2015 13:24
To: 99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD)
66 of 89
It was an uncouth comment (fail)
0/0
From: fixrman22 Apr 2015 14:30
To: 99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD)
67 of 89
If you are a hot black lipstick lesbian, I will have a sex change (?) so that I can have sex with you. I am attracted to lesbians, being like one myself - trapped in a man's body.
There is the perfect beer for you over here, Stone Arrogant Bastard. Right up your street, I think, plus quite good.
It isn't too expensive, you're too cheap.
There is the perfect beer for you over here, Stone Arrogant Bastard. Right up your street, I think, plus quite good.
It isn't too expensive, you're too cheap.
0/0
From: 99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD)22 Apr 2015 16:16
To: fixrman
68 of 89
Looks a bit dark for me. Don't get me wrong, I'm not racist or anything, in fact some of my best friends are crackers, but I just prefer my beer paler.
0/0
From: 99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD)22 Apr 2015 16:17
To: CHYRON (DSMITHHFX)
69 of 89
Sorry, you lost me there.
0/0
From: fixrman22 Apr 2015 20:13
To: 99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD)
70 of 89
Uhhh... Crackers are white. As in, whipcrackers. Can't get any paler than that.
It is not for the faint of heart, bold and big. 7.2 ABV.
It is not for the faint of heart, bold and big. 7.2 ABV.
0/0
From: 99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD)23 Apr 2015 06:32
To: fixrman
71 of 89
I know. But, speaking as a nigger myself, having friends that are crackers is proof that I ain't no racialist.
And I don't do strong beers no more. I used to drink Chimay blue an' awl that shit. But now I jus' like to hang wit me homies an' drink Miller lite. An' shit.
And I don't do strong beers no more. I used to drink Chimay blue an' awl that shit. But now I jus' like to hang wit me homies an' drink Miller lite. An' shit.
EDITED: 23 Apr 2015 06:35 by MR_BASTARD
0/0
From: CHYRON (DSMITHHFX)23 Apr 2015 08:48
To: 99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD)
72 of 89
I doubt it.
0/0
From: 99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD)23 Apr 2015 13:24
To: CHYRON (DSMITHHFX)
73 of 89
You do realise that I don't read most of this crap, don't you?
EDITED: 23 Apr 2015 13:25 by MR_BASTARD
0/0
From: CHYRON (DSMITHHFX)23 Apr 2015 14:49
To: 99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD)
74 of 89
You and I were referring to this crap.
0/0
From: fixrman23 Apr 2015 15:00
To: 99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD)
75 of 89
Just be mindful of the Born On/Expiration dates.
0/0
From: fixrman23 Apr 2015 15:03
To: CHYRON (DSMITHHFX)
76 of 89
LOL
0/0
From: CHYRON (DSMITHHFX)23 Apr 2015 15:15
To: fixrman
77 of 89
I love you, man, but you are guilty of uncouth posting. And your views on gender are fucked up. :C
All I'm gonna say about it.
All I'm gonna say about it.
+2/2
From: fixrman23 Apr 2015 18:10
To: CHYRON (DSMITHHFX)
78 of 89
Obviously we disagree. I see nothing wrong with looking at a woman who is dressed nicely. Ogling is definitely out, as I said before. If a woman is dressed like streetwalker, she will likely get the leers. It does not of course give anyone the right to push unwelcome advances. Racy attire will, however, engender undue attention and probably unwelcome advances. The man must, attire aside, back off if rejected.
If you see something wrong with that, I don't know what to tell you.
I recall being in Stratford-upon-Avon in 2000 and saw three young ladies walking across a small bridge. I was talking with the rest of the group when all three whipped their tops up and bared their breasts. So, is anyone who looked at them a pig for having done so? What would a reasonable person expect? If I the guys I was with are fucked up for looking (I actually missed it), then the girls are fucked up for flashing.
So if a woman is wearing attire that leaves little to the imagination, why is she wearing it? For attention, to be admired and noticed? If someone notices, they are fucked up? That's pretty fucked up.
I don't know what you think my views of gender are, but I'd say your subjective handling of what you think they are would be quite fucked up, with all due consideration.
Right. One other thing: If you are extrapolating from what Ant said and applying it to me - that is fucked up. I never indicated in any way that a woman provacatively dressed deserves to be raped, touched, harrassed; nor did I say that leering at a woman so dressed is appropriate either. Billboards are designed so as to grab attention. Actually, my mother would even take you to task on inappropriate dress by a female.
It isn't anything goes by either side, mate. That is equality.
If you see something wrong with that, I don't know what to tell you.
I recall being in Stratford-upon-Avon in 2000 and saw three young ladies walking across a small bridge. I was talking with the rest of the group when all three whipped their tops up and bared their breasts. So, is anyone who looked at them a pig for having done so? What would a reasonable person expect? If I the guys I was with are fucked up for looking (I actually missed it), then the girls are fucked up for flashing.
So if a woman is wearing attire that leaves little to the imagination, why is she wearing it? For attention, to be admired and noticed? If someone notices, they are fucked up? That's pretty fucked up.
I don't know what you think my views of gender are, but I'd say your subjective handling of what you think they are would be quite fucked up, with all due consideration.
Right. One other thing: If you are extrapolating from what Ant said and applying it to me - that is fucked up. I never indicated in any way that a woman provacatively dressed deserves to be raped, touched, harrassed; nor did I say that leering at a woman so dressed is appropriate either. Billboards are designed so as to grab attention. Actually, my mother would even take you to task on inappropriate dress by a female.
It isn't anything goes by either side, mate. That is equality.
EDITED: 23 Apr 2015 18:15 by FIXRMAN
0/0
From: 99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD)23 Apr 2015 18:41
To: fixrman
79 of 89
FWIW, I agree with you.
0/0