1–1011–12

QNAP NAS

From: CHYRON (DSMITHHFX)27 Nov 2014 01:52
To: Peter (BOUGHTONP) 4 of 12
41286.4 In reply to 41286.2
Allegedly, except it's got a remote admin app Qfinder that you use to initialize it. That's where the documentation is patchy, if you don't go with the default RAID 5 (I want to do 10). I did post a query on their forum earlier.

Ooh, already got a good answer too

http://forum.qnap.com/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=100132&p=447163#p447163
EDITED: 27 Nov 2014 02:08 by DSMITHHFX
Reply
0/0
From: 99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD)27 Nov 2014 07:58
To: CHYRON (DSMITHHFX) 5 of 12
41286.5 In reply to 41286.1
Yes, I have one (TS-470 Pro)

That Patrick Wilson is an arrogant tosser.
Reply
0/0
From: CHYRON (DSMITHHFX)27 Nov 2014 11:41
To: 99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD) 6 of 12
41286.6 In reply to 41286.5
Mild autism at a guess.
Reply
0/0
From: CHYRON (DSMITHHFX)27 Nov 2014 11:45
To: ALL7 of 12
41286.7
http://www.zdnet.com/blog/storage/raidfail-dont-use-raid-5-on-small-arrays/483
Reply
0/0
From: Dan (HERMAND)27 Nov 2014 13:19
To: CHYRON (DSMITHHFX) 8 of 12
41286.8 In reply to 41286.7
Don't use RAID5 anywhere!
Reply
+1/1
From: 99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD)27 Nov 2014 13:59
To: CHYRON (DSMITHHFX) 9 of 12
41286.9 In reply to 41286.6
Not that mild. He's managed to piss off quite a few QNAP customers.

Plus what Dan said.
Reply
0/0
From: CHYRON (DSMITHHFX)27 Nov 2014 18:34
To: Dan (HERMAND) 10 of 12
41286.10 In reply to 41286.8
Not planning to!
Reply
0/0
From: CHYRON (DSMITHHFX) 2 Dec 2014 22:42
To: ALL11 of 12
41286.11
Happy to report setup was a breeze (thus far), apart from a port trunking snafu where I had to hit reset to be able to find it on the lan again (didn't realize our new managed switch supports static trunking until I read the datasheet; it wasn't mentioned in the manual).

Heavy lifting to come.
Reply
0/0
From: CHYRON (DSMITHHFX) 2 Dec 2014 22:44
To: 99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD) 12 of 12
41286.12 In reply to 41286.9
Yeah after rummaging around a bit I can see where he would.
Reply
0/0