1–1011–2021–3031–34

Another liar exposed!

From: 99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD)15 Nov 2014 18:51
To: CHYRON (DSMITHHFX) 15 of 34
41270.15 In reply to 41270.14
Windows 8 FTW
Reply
0/0
From: CHYRON (DSMITHHFX)15 Nov 2014 22:33
To: 99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD) 16 of 34
41270.16 In reply to 41270.15
If I used Windows more often, the version might matter to me.
EDITED: 15 Nov 2014 22:36 by DSMITHHFX
Reply
0/0
From: 99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD)15 Nov 2014 22:52
To: CHYRON (DSMITHHFX) 17 of 34
41270.17 In reply to 41270.16
That version would blow your fucking mind. Or what passes for it.
Reply
0/0
From: CHYRON (DSMITHHFX)16 Nov 2014 00:15
To: 99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD) 18 of 34
41270.18 In reply to 41270.17
From what little I've seen of it, it is certainly baffling.
Reply
0/0
From: fixrman16 Nov 2014 03:11
To: 99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD) 19 of 34
41270.19 In reply to 41270.15
Windows Ain't Sucks.
Reply
0/0
From: Ken (SHIELDSIT)18 Nov 2014 14:46
To: Drew (X3N0PH0N) 20 of 34
41270.20 In reply to 41270.14
Plus it hasn't reached end of life.  I'm interested to see what MS will do when someone releases a show stopping virus.  I wonder if they will refuse to patch it or if the pressure to do so will be to great.  They may actually be wishing for that to happen to speed up the adoption of newer OS's.

I'm running the 10 Technical Review and it's no different than 8 with a hybrid start menu.  Of course it's still early so lots could change before it's released I guess.
Reply
0/0
From: CHYRON (DSMITHHFX)18 Nov 2014 15:32
To: Ken (SHIELDSIT) 21 of 34
41270.21 In reply to 41270.20
https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/security/ms14-nov.aspx
Reply
0/0
From: Ken (SHIELDSIT)18 Nov 2014 15:58
To: CHYRON (DSMITHHFX) 22 of 34
41270.22 In reply to 41270.21
What are you showing me here?  That XP is already in trouble?
Reply
0/0
From: CHYRON (DSMITHHFX)18 Nov 2014 16:22
To: Ken (SHIELDSIT) 23 of 34
41270.23 In reply to 41270.22
xp's not on that shit list.
Reply
0/0
From: Ken (SHIELDSIT)18 Nov 2014 17:29
To: CHYRON (DSMITHHFX) 24 of 34
41270.24 In reply to 41270.23
That's because the OS's on that list are getting patched, XP isn't on that list because it's not and will be vulnerable.
Reply
0/0
From: 99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD)18 Nov 2014 17:40
To: CHYRON (DSMITHHFX) 25 of 34
41270.25 In reply to 41270.23
What Ken said, XP is EOL:
http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/enterprise/end-of-support.aspx
EDITED: 18 Nov 2014 17:41 by MR_BASTARD
Reply
0/0
From: CHYRON (DSMITHHFX)18 Nov 2014 18:15
To: Ken (SHIELDSIT) 26 of 34
41270.26 In reply to 41270.24
Maybe. Maybe not.
 
Quote: 
Other versions or editions are either past their support life cycle or are not affected.
Reply
0/0
From: Ken (SHIELDSIT)18 Nov 2014 18:19
To: CHYRON (DSMITHHFX) 27 of 34
41270.27 In reply to 41270.26
XP shares the same kernel as Server 2003.  I checked a few older patches and it's the same.  IE 6 critical patch from October isn't available for XP, we both know IE 6 is in XP.

*I'm not trying to convince you to upgrade.  I just want you to be aware that XP will soon be pretty risky to use if it isn't already.
EDITED: 18 Nov 2014 18:20 by SHIELDSIT
Reply
0/0
From: CHYRON (DSMITHHFX)18 Nov 2014 18:22
To: Ken (SHIELDSIT) 28 of 34
41270.28 In reply to 41270.27
"we both know IE 6 is in XP"

Not for me it isn't.
Reply
0/0
From: Ken (SHIELDSIT)18 Nov 2014 18:23
To: CHYRON (DSMITHHFX) 29 of 34
41270.29 In reply to 41270.28
You've somehow uncoupled IE from Windows?
Reply
0/0
From: CHYRON (DSMITHHFX)18 Nov 2014 18:27
To: Ken (SHIELDSIT) 30 of 34
41270.30 In reply to 41270.27
Oh I'm sure it is risky, but they're also finding vulnerabilities in all newer releases, apparently. So there's that.
Reply
0/0
From: CHYRON (DSMITHHFX)18 Nov 2014 18:28
To: Ken (SHIELDSIT) 31 of 34
41270.31 In reply to 41270.29
Nope, I installed ie8.
Reply
0/0
From: Ken (SHIELDSIT)18 Nov 2014 18:30
To: CHYRON (DSMITHHFX) 32 of 34
41270.32 In reply to 41270.30
True, but they are being patched.  That's all I'm saying.
Reply
0/0
From: CHYRON (DSMITHHFX)18 Nov 2014 18:34
To: Ken (SHIELDSIT) 33 of 34
41270.33 In reply to 41270.32
True enuf.  I don't use it for web surfing for sure, and it's only on for 2-3 hours a week for 99% offline stuff. Otherwise I'm on a very recent linux that I keep up to date.
EDITED: 18 Nov 2014 18:36 by DSMITHHFX
Reply
0/0
From: CHYRON (DSMITHHFX)19 Nov 2014 01:40
To: ALL34 of 34
41270.34
STOP XP SLUT SHAMING!

 :-((  :-((
EDITED: 19 Nov 2014 01:43 by DSMITHHFX
Reply
0/0